{"title":"Efficacy and safety of upfront radiotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors for brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer","authors":"Yu Tanaka , Hiroki Izumi , Eri Sugiyama , Tetsuya Sakai , Yuji Shibata , Kaname Nosaki , Hibiki Udagawa , Shigeki Umemura , Yoshitaka Zenke , Shingo Matsumoto , Kiyotaka Yoh , Tetsuo Akimoto , Koichi Goto","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The optimal timing of radiotherapy (RT) for asymptomatic brain metastasis (aBM) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable oncogenic drivers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront (U)-RT combined with ICIs for aBM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with aBM from NSCLC who received ICI-containing chemotherapy at National Cancer Center Hospital East between 2016 and 2021. The U-RT group was defined patients who received RT for aBM before or during the first ICI cycle, and the non-U-RT group otherwise.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 324 patients with NSCLC and aBM screened, 54 were enrolled, with 34 and 20 patients in the U-RT and non-U-RT groups, respectively. The median overall survival was 27.5 and 13.8 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.40, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.87), respectively, and median cranial progression-free survival was 9.2 and 6.0 months (HR = 0.50, 95 % CI 0.25–0.98), respectively, in the U-RT and non-U-RT groups. The U-RT group showed a significantly lower aBM progression rate than the non-U-RT group (<em>P</em> = 0.04). U-RT was an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis using propensity score adjustment (HR = 0.42, 95 % CI 0.18–0.96). Although severe adverse events were observed in 47 % and 35 % of patients in the U-RT and non-U-RT groups, respectively, no treatment-related deaths occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ICIs with U-RT demonstrated higher efficacy with acceptable tolerability for aBM than ICIs without U-RT. Our findings should be confirmed in future prospective trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100937"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294225000735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The optimal timing of radiotherapy (RT) for asymptomatic brain metastasis (aBM) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable oncogenic drivers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront (U)-RT combined with ICIs for aBM.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with aBM from NSCLC who received ICI-containing chemotherapy at National Cancer Center Hospital East between 2016 and 2021. The U-RT group was defined patients who received RT for aBM before or during the first ICI cycle, and the non-U-RT group otherwise.
Results
Of the 324 patients with NSCLC and aBM screened, 54 were enrolled, with 34 and 20 patients in the U-RT and non-U-RT groups, respectively. The median overall survival was 27.5 and 13.8 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.40, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.87), respectively, and median cranial progression-free survival was 9.2 and 6.0 months (HR = 0.50, 95 % CI 0.25–0.98), respectively, in the U-RT and non-U-RT groups. The U-RT group showed a significantly lower aBM progression rate than the non-U-RT group (P = 0.04). U-RT was an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis using propensity score adjustment (HR = 0.42, 95 % CI 0.18–0.96). Although severe adverse events were observed in 47 % and 35 % of patients in the U-RT and non-U-RT groups, respectively, no treatment-related deaths occurred.
Conclusions
ICIs with U-RT demonstrated higher efficacy with acceptable tolerability for aBM than ICIs without U-RT. Our findings should be confirmed in future prospective trials.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.