Integrating Generative AI in Chemistry Education: Enhancing Career-Ready Writing Skills in Pharmaceutical Science

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Elizabeth Yuriev*, Matthew G. Burton, Drew Knott, Alice E. Terrill, Neale R. C. Jackson and Shuqi Chen, 
{"title":"Integrating Generative AI in Chemistry Education: Enhancing Career-Ready Writing Skills in Pharmaceutical Science","authors":"Elizabeth Yuriev*,&nbsp;Matthew G. Burton,&nbsp;Drew Knott,&nbsp;Alice E. Terrill,&nbsp;Neale R. C. Jackson and Shuqi Chen,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0149910.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Integrating generative AI (GenAI) into chemistry education offers opportunities to enhance student engagement and skill development, but its use raises questions about ensuring knowledge accuracy and fostering critical thinking. This study explored a context-based assignment in which undergraduate chemistry students analyzed a pharmaceutical formulation while collaborating with a GenAI tool to draft their reports. Students produced an initial GenAI-generated report, critically evaluated its content, and revised it extensively using authoritative sources. The assignment emphasized professional skills by encouraging students to co-create work that emulates tasks they might encounter in a pharmaceutical career. Analysis of student submissions revealed diverse engagement with GenAI tools. While a fraction of students overrelied on GenAI-generated content, resulting in factual inaccuracies, the majority demonstrated critical engagement by correcting errors, adding physicochemical justifications, and transforming GenAI-generated bullet points into professional, coherent paragraphs. Reflective evaluations further highlighted students’ awareness of GenAI’s strengths, such as efficiency and structure, as well as its limitations, including factual errors and lack of contextual depth. The findings suggest that GenAI can be a powerful tool for enhancing technical chemical writing and critical thinking when paired with structured guidance and iterative feedback. This study highlights the importance of teaching students to critically evaluate and refine GenAI outputs, preparing them for professional scenarios in which collaboration with GenAI will be increasingly common. The assignment provides a framework for integrating GenAI into chemistry and STEM education, balancing technological innovation with the need for scientific rigor and ethical awareness.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 5","pages":"1991–2001 1991–2001"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01499","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating generative AI (GenAI) into chemistry education offers opportunities to enhance student engagement and skill development, but its use raises questions about ensuring knowledge accuracy and fostering critical thinking. This study explored a context-based assignment in which undergraduate chemistry students analyzed a pharmaceutical formulation while collaborating with a GenAI tool to draft their reports. Students produced an initial GenAI-generated report, critically evaluated its content, and revised it extensively using authoritative sources. The assignment emphasized professional skills by encouraging students to co-create work that emulates tasks they might encounter in a pharmaceutical career. Analysis of student submissions revealed diverse engagement with GenAI tools. While a fraction of students overrelied on GenAI-generated content, resulting in factual inaccuracies, the majority demonstrated critical engagement by correcting errors, adding physicochemical justifications, and transforming GenAI-generated bullet points into professional, coherent paragraphs. Reflective evaluations further highlighted students’ awareness of GenAI’s strengths, such as efficiency and structure, as well as its limitations, including factual errors and lack of contextual depth. The findings suggest that GenAI can be a powerful tool for enhancing technical chemical writing and critical thinking when paired with structured guidance and iterative feedback. This study highlights the importance of teaching students to critically evaluate and refine GenAI outputs, preparing them for professional scenarios in which collaboration with GenAI will be increasingly common. The assignment provides a framework for integrating GenAI into chemistry and STEM education, balancing technological innovation with the need for scientific rigor and ethical awareness.

Abstract Image

将生成式人工智能整合到化学教育中:提高药学专业的职业写作技能
将生成式人工智能(GenAI)整合到化学教育中,为提高学生的参与度和技能发展提供了机会,但它的使用引发了有关确保知识准确性和培养批判性思维的问题。本研究探索了一项基于上下文的作业,在该作业中,本科化学专业的学生分析了一种药物配方,同时与GenAI工具合作起草了他们的报告。学生们制作了一份由genai生成的初步报告,对其内容进行了批判性评估,并使用权威来源对其进行了广泛修订。该作业强调专业技能,鼓励学生共同创造工作,模拟他们在制药职业生涯中可能遇到的任务。对学生提交的分析显示,他们对GenAI工具的参与程度不同。虽然一小部分学生过度依赖genai生成的内容,导致事实不准确,但大多数学生通过纠正错误,添加物理化学理由,并将genai生成的要点转换为专业,连贯的段落,表现出批判性的参与。反思性评价进一步强调了学生们对GenAI的优势的认识,例如效率和结构,以及它的局限性,包括事实错误和缺乏上下文深度。研究结果表明,如果与结构化指导和迭代反馈相结合,GenAI可以成为增强技术化学写作和批判性思维的强大工具。这项研究强调了教导学生批判性地评估和改进GenAI输出的重要性,使他们为与GenAI合作将日益普遍的专业场景做好准备。该任务为将GenAI整合到化学和STEM教育中提供了一个框架,平衡了技术创新与科学严谨性和伦理意识的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信