Trajectories of Weekly Interest, Competence Beliefs, and Belonging in a General Chemistry Course

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Patrick N. Beymer*, Heather Putman, Kitley A. Kern, Daniel C. Waddell and Megan E. Bucks, 
{"title":"Trajectories of Weekly Interest, Competence Beliefs, and Belonging in a General Chemistry Course","authors":"Patrick N. Beymer*,&nbsp;Heather Putman,&nbsp;Kitley A. Kern,&nbsp;Daniel C. Waddell and Megan E. Bucks,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0135910.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Using an intensive longitudinal design, we examined the development of students’ weekly interest, competence beliefs, and belonging across a single semester of general chemistry 1 (N = 694). We also examined race, gender, first-generation status, and the modality of viewing lectures as predictors and final chemistry interest, final exam scores, and persistence to general chemistry 2 as outcomes. Latent growth curve models indicated declines in all three weekly motivational beliefs. Next, we found that students who always viewed the lectures in-person, compared to those who sometimes viewed the lecture online and sometimes in-person, had higher initial levels of weekly interest and had slower declines in competence beliefs. Women had lower initial levels of weekly belonging, but slower declines throughout the semester compared to men. Students who reported higher initial weekly interest, competence beliefs, and belonging, and who had slower declines in those beliefs reported higher final chemistry interest. Those with higher initial levels of weekly interest and belonging and those with slower declines in competence beliefs and belonging had higher final exam scores. Finally, those with slower declines in weekly interest, competence beliefs, and belonging were more likely to persist to general chemistry 2. Results suggest that individual factors like gender and lecture modality significantly predicted motivational beliefs. Additionally, these motivational beliefs are strong predictors of academic outcomes, including final exam scores and persistence in the course sequence.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 5","pages":"1776–1787 1776–1787"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using an intensive longitudinal design, we examined the development of students’ weekly interest, competence beliefs, and belonging across a single semester of general chemistry 1 (N = 694). We also examined race, gender, first-generation status, and the modality of viewing lectures as predictors and final chemistry interest, final exam scores, and persistence to general chemistry 2 as outcomes. Latent growth curve models indicated declines in all three weekly motivational beliefs. Next, we found that students who always viewed the lectures in-person, compared to those who sometimes viewed the lecture online and sometimes in-person, had higher initial levels of weekly interest and had slower declines in competence beliefs. Women had lower initial levels of weekly belonging, but slower declines throughout the semester compared to men. Students who reported higher initial weekly interest, competence beliefs, and belonging, and who had slower declines in those beliefs reported higher final chemistry interest. Those with higher initial levels of weekly interest and belonging and those with slower declines in competence beliefs and belonging had higher final exam scores. Finally, those with slower declines in weekly interest, competence beliefs, and belonging were more likely to persist to general chemistry 2. Results suggest that individual factors like gender and lecture modality significantly predicted motivational beliefs. Additionally, these motivational beliefs are strong predictors of academic outcomes, including final exam scores and persistence in the course sequence.

Abstract Image

普通化学课程每周兴趣、能力信念与归属感的轨迹
使用密集的纵向设计,我们检查了学生每周兴趣的发展,能力信念,和归属在一个学期的普通化学1 (N = 694)。我们还研究了种族、性别、第一代身份,以及将讲座视为预测因素的方式,以及将最终化学兴趣、期末考试成绩和对普通化学2的坚持作为结果。潜在增长曲线模型表明,所有三个每周的动机信念都有所下降。接下来,我们发现,与那些有时在网上观看讲座,有时在现场观看讲座的学生相比,总是亲自观看讲座的学生每周的兴趣水平更高,能力信念的下降速度也更慢。与男性相比,女性最初的每周归属感水平较低,但在整个学期中下降的速度较慢。报告最初每周兴趣、能力信念和归属感较高的学生,以及这些信念下降较慢的学生,报告最终对化学的兴趣较高。那些最初每周兴趣和归属感水平较高的人,以及那些能力信念和归属感下降较慢的人,在期末考试中得分较高。最后,那些每周兴趣、能力信念和归属感下降较慢的人更有可能坚持普通化学。结果表明,性别和授课方式等个体因素对动机信念有显著的预测作用。此外,这些动机信念是学习成绩的有力预测因素,包括期末考试成绩和对课程顺序的坚持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信