Reduced treatment response to inhaled corticosteroids in current smokers with COPD, regardless of blood eosinophil count: insights from the FLAME trial.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Thorax Pub Date : 2025-05-11 DOI:10.1136/thorax-2024-222547
Alexander G Mathioudakis,Andrew Higham,Sebastian Bate,Victoria Chatzimavridou-Grigoriadou,Pradeesh Sivapalan,Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen,Tim Felton,Jørgen Vestbo,Dave Singh
{"title":"Reduced treatment response to inhaled corticosteroids in current smokers with COPD, regardless of blood eosinophil count: insights from the FLAME trial.","authors":"Alexander G Mathioudakis,Andrew Higham,Sebastian Bate,Victoria Chatzimavridou-Grigoriadou,Pradeesh Sivapalan,Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen,Tim Felton,Jørgen Vestbo,Dave Singh","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) benefit patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at high risk of exacerbations with raised blood eosinophil count (BEC). Emerging evidence suggests current smokers show a reduced response to ICS. This post-hoc analysis of the FLAME trial explored the impact of smoking status on the efficacy of long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA)+ICS versus LABA+long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) for preventing exacerbations. Our findings indicate that LABA+LAMA is superior to LABA+ICS in preventing moderate to severe exacerbations in current smokers and inferior in ex-smokers with BEC ≥200 cells/µL. Smoking status significantly modifies ICS treatment effects on exacerbation outcomes, suggesting reduced ICS efficacy in current smokers, regardless of BEC.","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222547","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) benefit patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at high risk of exacerbations with raised blood eosinophil count (BEC). Emerging evidence suggests current smokers show a reduced response to ICS. This post-hoc analysis of the FLAME trial explored the impact of smoking status on the efficacy of long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA)+ICS versus LABA+long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) for preventing exacerbations. Our findings indicate that LABA+LAMA is superior to LABA+ICS in preventing moderate to severe exacerbations in current smokers and inferior in ex-smokers with BEC ≥200 cells/µL. Smoking status significantly modifies ICS treatment effects on exacerbation outcomes, suggesting reduced ICS efficacy in current smokers, regardless of BEC.
当前吸烟者COPD患者吸入皮质类固醇治疗反应降低,无论血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数如何:来自FLAME试验的见解
吸入糖皮质激素(ICSs)有利于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,这些患者有较高的急性加重风险,并伴有血嗜酸性粒细胞计数(BEC)升高。新出现的证据表明,当前吸烟者对ICS的反应减弱。这项FLAME试验的事后分析探讨了吸烟状况对长效β -2激动剂(LABA)+ICS与LABA+长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)预防急性加重疗效的影响。我们的研究结果表明,在当前吸烟者中,LABA+LAMA在预防中度至重度恶化方面优于LABA+ICS,而在BEC≥200细胞/µL的戒烟者中,LABA+LAMA的效果较差。吸烟状况显著改变了ICS治疗对加重结局的影响,提示当前吸烟者的ICS疗效降低,与BEC无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thorax
Thorax 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
197
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信