Rizatriptan vs Placebo for Attacks of Vestibular Migraine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jeffrey P Staab,Scott D Z Eggers,Joanna C Jen,Allison M LeMahieu,Jennifer R Geske,Honghu Liu,Deanna R Hofschulte,G Roxana Gonzalez,Brian A Neff,Neil T Shepard,Devin L McCaslin,Robert W Baloh
{"title":"Rizatriptan vs Placebo for Attacks of Vestibular Migraine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Jeffrey P Staab,Scott D Z Eggers,Joanna C Jen,Allison M LeMahieu,Jennifer R Geske,Honghu Liu,Deanna R Hofschulte,G Roxana Gonzalez,Brian A Neff,Neil T Shepard,Devin L McCaslin,Robert W Baloh","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nVestibular migraine has no established treatments.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo test the efficacy of rizatriptan for treating vestibular migraine attacks.\r\n\r\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\r\nThis double-blind, randomized clinical trial of rizatriptan vs placebo was conducted from December 2014 through July 2020 (data analyses in 2021 and sensitivity analyses in 2022 and 2024) at 2 tertiary neurotologic centers. Adults with vestibular migraine were included.\r\n\r\nIntervention\r\nAll participants underwent prospective observation to confirm diagnosis and illness activity and were then randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive rizatriptan 10 mg or placebo to treat up to 3 vestibular migraine attacks per participant.\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nParticipants rated symptoms as absent, mild, moderate, or severe at scheduled intervals. Primary outcomes were the percentage of attacks with reductions in vertigo and unsteadiness/dizziness from moderate or severe to absent or mild at 1 hour. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of attacks with complete resolution of vestibular symptoms at 1 hour; reductions in headache and associated symptoms at 1 hour; use of rescue medications after 1 hour; reductions in vestibular, headache, and associated symptoms at 24 hours without rescue medications; treatment satisfaction and quality of life at 48 hours; and rates of serious adverse effects and discontinuation due to adverse effects.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nOf 222 total participants (mean [SD] age, 42.3 [11.7] years; 70.7% were women), 134 (60.4%) with active illness treated 307 attacks. Efficacy was tested using 240 attacks with vestibular symptoms rated as moderate or severe when participants took study drug. At 1 hour, rizatriptan did not differ from placebo for reducing vertigo (73/151 [48.3%] vs 50/88 [56.8%] attacks; odds ratio [OR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.42-1.21]), unsteadiness/dizziness (29/151 [19.2%] vs 11/89 [12.4%] attacks; OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.80-3.57]), or any secondary outcomes. Similar percentages of participants in rizatriptan and placebo groups (26.4% for both groups) added rescue remedies after 1 hour. At 24 hours, rizatriptan had medium effects over placebo for unsteadiness/dizziness (OR, 2.65) and motion sensitivity (OR, 3.58). Post hoc analyses of all treated attacks found a medium effect favoring rizatriptan for headache and photophobia or phonophobia at 24 hours. Treatment satisfaction was equivocal. Quality of life was mixed. No participants experienced serious adverse effects or discontinued treatment for adverse effects.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nIn this study, rizatriptan was ineffective at 1 hour for treating vestibular migraine attacks and had limited benefit on symptoms at 24 hours. Findings do not support using rizatriptan for vestibular migraine attacks.\r\n\r\nTrial Registration\r\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02447991.","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance Vestibular migraine has no established treatments. Objective To test the efficacy of rizatriptan for treating vestibular migraine attacks. Design, Setting, and Participants This double-blind, randomized clinical trial of rizatriptan vs placebo was conducted from December 2014 through July 2020 (data analyses in 2021 and sensitivity analyses in 2022 and 2024) at 2 tertiary neurotologic centers. Adults with vestibular migraine were included. Intervention All participants underwent prospective observation to confirm diagnosis and illness activity and were then randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive rizatriptan 10 mg or placebo to treat up to 3 vestibular migraine attacks per participant. Main Outcomes and Measures Participants rated symptoms as absent, mild, moderate, or severe at scheduled intervals. Primary outcomes were the percentage of attacks with reductions in vertigo and unsteadiness/dizziness from moderate or severe to absent or mild at 1 hour. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of attacks with complete resolution of vestibular symptoms at 1 hour; reductions in headache and associated symptoms at 1 hour; use of rescue medications after 1 hour; reductions in vestibular, headache, and associated symptoms at 24 hours without rescue medications; treatment satisfaction and quality of life at 48 hours; and rates of serious adverse effects and discontinuation due to adverse effects. Results Of 222 total participants (mean [SD] age, 42.3 [11.7] years; 70.7% were women), 134 (60.4%) with active illness treated 307 attacks. Efficacy was tested using 240 attacks with vestibular symptoms rated as moderate or severe when participants took study drug. At 1 hour, rizatriptan did not differ from placebo for reducing vertigo (73/151 [48.3%] vs 50/88 [56.8%] attacks; odds ratio [OR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.42-1.21]), unsteadiness/dizziness (29/151 [19.2%] vs 11/89 [12.4%] attacks; OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.80-3.57]), or any secondary outcomes. Similar percentages of participants in rizatriptan and placebo groups (26.4% for both groups) added rescue remedies after 1 hour. At 24 hours, rizatriptan had medium effects over placebo for unsteadiness/dizziness (OR, 2.65) and motion sensitivity (OR, 3.58). Post hoc analyses of all treated attacks found a medium effect favoring rizatriptan for headache and photophobia or phonophobia at 24 hours. Treatment satisfaction was equivocal. Quality of life was mixed. No participants experienced serious adverse effects or discontinued treatment for adverse effects. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, rizatriptan was ineffective at 1 hour for treating vestibular migraine attacks and had limited benefit on symptoms at 24 hours. Findings do not support using rizatriptan for vestibular migraine attacks. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02447991.
利扎曲坦vs安慰剂治疗前庭偏头痛:一项随机临床试验
前庭偏头痛没有确定的治疗方法。目的观察利扎曲坦治疗前庭偏头痛发作的疗效。设计、环境和参与者这项利扎曲坦与安慰剂的双盲随机临床试验于2014年12月至2020年7月在2个三级神经学中心进行(2021年的数据分析和2022年和2024年的敏感性分析)。包括患有前庭偏头痛的成年人。所有参与者都进行了前瞻性观察,以确认诊断和疾病活动,然后以2:1的比例随机分配,接受10mg利扎曲坦或安慰剂治疗,每名参与者最多3次前庭偏头痛发作。主要结局和测量:参与者在预定的时间间隔内将症状分为无症状、轻度、中度或重度。主要结局是眩晕和不稳定/头晕从中度或重度减少到1小时无或轻度的发作百分比。次要结局是在1小时内前庭症状完全缓解的发作百分比;1小时内头痛和相关症状减轻;1小时后使用抢救药物;在不使用急救药物的24小时内前庭、头痛和相关症状减轻;48小时治疗满意度及生活质量;严重不良反应和因不良反应而停药的比率。结果222名参与者(平均[SD]年龄42.3[11.7]岁;70.7%为女性),134例(60.4%)活动性疾病治疗307次发作。当参与者服用研究药物时,对240次前庭症状分为中度或重度的发作进行了疗效测试。1小时时,利扎曲坦与安慰剂在减少眩晕发作方面没有差异(73/151 [48.3%]vs 50/88 [56.8%]);优势比[OR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.42-1.21]),不稳定/头晕发作(29/151 [19.2%]vs 11/89 [12.4%];OR为1.69 [95% CI, 0.80-3.57]),或任何次要结局。利扎曲坦组和安慰剂组的参与者在1小时后加入救援药物的比例相似(两组均为26.4%)。24小时时,利扎曲坦在不稳定/头晕(OR, 2.65)和运动敏感(OR, 3.58)方面的效果比安慰剂中等。对所有治疗发作的事后分析发现,在24小时内,利扎曲坦对头痛、畏光或恐音有中等效果。治疗的满意度是模棱两可的。生活质量参差不齐。没有参与者出现严重的不良反应或因不良反应而停止治疗。结论和相关性在这项研究中,利扎曲坦在1小时内对前庭偏头痛发作无效,在24小时内对症状的改善有限。研究结果不支持使用利扎曲坦治疗前庭偏头痛。试验注册:clinicaltrials .gov标识符:NCT02447991。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信