Does the Lost Jim lava flow (Alaska) really preserve evidence of interaction with permafrost?

Abstract

The basaltic Lost Jim lava flow, the youngest member of the Imuruk Lake volcanic field, Alaska, is reported to have interacted with underlying permafrost by thawing it and forming cavities into which the lava flow collapsed, forming pits and other depressions on the lava flow's surface. Our field observations contradict this hypothesis. The Lost Jim lava flow exhibits surface features typical of an inflated pāhoehoe flow, and we propose instead that most of the pits are unambiguously the result of flow inflation (i.e., lava-rise pits). These pits are found on elevated, relatively level surfaces, and their inner walls preserve features like rotated surface slabs and fine-scale flow banding on exposed crack surfaces, both of which are hallmarks of lava flow inflation. While collapse pits do exist on the Lost Jim lava flow, they are morphologically distinct and formed by crustal failure into drained lava tubes.

Satellite images of the Lost Jim lava flow show similarities in the size and distribution of pits within other young pāhoehoe lava flows scattered across the globe. The small diameter of many of the pits (<10 m), compared to flow thickness (≥10 m), also argues against collapse—numerical modeling shows that the relatively high tensile strength of a coherent lava flow would have prevented its collapse into cavities similar in diameter to the lava flow's thickness. Finally, the pits are found scattered across the Lost Jim lava flow, including in locations where the lava flow rests directly on bedrock, which consists of older lava flows. Segregated ice lenses and soil expansion—necessary components for thermokarst formation when thawed—do not exist in such locations. Altogether, these factors show that the Lost Jim lava flow is an inflated lava flow, and permafrost played no significant role during or after its emplacement.