A Systematic Literature Review on Neonatal Fingerprint Recognition

IF 23.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Luiz Fernando Puttow Southier, Gustavo Alexandre Tuchlinowicz Nunes, João Henrique Pereira Machado, Matheus Buratti, Pedro Henrique de Viveiros Trentin, Wesley Augusto Catuzzo de Bona, Barbara de Oliveira Koop, Elioenai Diniz, João Victor Costa Mazzochin, João Leonardo Harres Dall Agnol, Lucas Caldeira de Oliveira, Marcelo Filipak, Luiz Antonio Zanlorensi, Marcos Belançon, Jefferson Oliva, Marcelo Teixeira, Dalcimar Casanova
{"title":"A Systematic Literature Review on Neonatal Fingerprint Recognition","authors":"Luiz Fernando Puttow Southier, Gustavo Alexandre Tuchlinowicz Nunes, João Henrique Pereira Machado, Matheus Buratti, Pedro Henrique de Viveiros Trentin, Wesley Augusto Catuzzo de Bona, Barbara de Oliveira Koop, Elioenai Diniz, João Victor Costa Mazzochin, João Leonardo Harres Dall Agnol, Lucas Caldeira de Oliveira, Marcelo Filipak, Luiz Antonio Zanlorensi, Marcos Belançon, Jefferson Oliva, Marcelo Teixeira, Dalcimar Casanova","doi":"10.1145/3735551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neonatal biometrics, especially those based on fingerprint traits, can potentially improve early childhood identification with decisive applications in healthcare, identity management, and other critical social domains. Although many biometric approaches to human recognition exist, most of them can not be directly applied to neonates. The main barrier is the reduced size of children’s biometric traits, which affects image quality as these traits are still developing. Another issue is the lack of child biometric databases, as a periodic recollection of images is a fundamental part of neonatal identification regarding the feasibility evaluation of temporal recognition. Several works can be found in the literature addressing some of these issues. However, there is still no systematic review allowing a general understanding of these solutions, discussing their links, gaps, comparisons, and open challenges. In this sense, this paper presents a systematic literature review on neonatal biometrics. In total, 1,878 papers were screened and classified, resulting in 45 being selected to be analyzed in this study. We detail and compare the results of datasets, scanners, methods, and techniques to achieve and improve neonatal recognition. Finally, research trends are identified and discussed based on the main gaps in the literature.","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3735551","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neonatal biometrics, especially those based on fingerprint traits, can potentially improve early childhood identification with decisive applications in healthcare, identity management, and other critical social domains. Although many biometric approaches to human recognition exist, most of them can not be directly applied to neonates. The main barrier is the reduced size of children’s biometric traits, which affects image quality as these traits are still developing. Another issue is the lack of child biometric databases, as a periodic recollection of images is a fundamental part of neonatal identification regarding the feasibility evaluation of temporal recognition. Several works can be found in the literature addressing some of these issues. However, there is still no systematic review allowing a general understanding of these solutions, discussing their links, gaps, comparisons, and open challenges. In this sense, this paper presents a systematic literature review on neonatal biometrics. In total, 1,878 papers were screened and classified, resulting in 45 being selected to be analyzed in this study. We detail and compare the results of datasets, scanners, methods, and techniques to achieve and improve neonatal recognition. Finally, research trends are identified and discussed based on the main gaps in the literature.
新生儿指纹识别的系统文献综述
新生儿生物识别技术,特别是基于指纹特征的生物识别技术,在医疗保健、身份管理和其他关键的社会领域具有决定性的应用,有可能改善儿童早期识别。尽管存在许多生物特征识别方法,但大多数方法都不能直接应用于新生儿。主要的障碍是儿童生物特征的缩小,这影响了图像质量,因为这些特征仍在发育中。另一个问题是缺乏儿童生物特征数据库,因为定期回忆图像是新生儿识别的基本组成部分,涉及时间识别的可行性评估。在文献中可以找到一些解决这些问题的作品。然而,目前仍然没有系统的综述,无法对这些解决方案进行总体理解,讨论它们之间的联系、差距、比较和开放的挑战。在这个意义上,本文提出了一个系统的文献综述新生儿生物识别。总共筛选和分类了1878篇论文,最终选出45篇论文作为本研究的分析对象。我们详细比较了数据集、扫描仪、方法和技术的结果,以实现和提高新生儿识别。最后,根据文献中的主要空白,对研究趋势进行了识别和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Computing Surveys
ACM Computing Surveys 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
33.20
自引率
0.60%
发文量
372
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods. ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信