Luiz Fernando Puttow Southier, Gustavo Alexandre Tuchlinowicz Nunes, João Henrique Pereira Machado, Matheus Buratti, Pedro Henrique de Viveiros Trentin, Wesley Augusto Catuzzo de Bona, Barbara de Oliveira Koop, Elioenai Diniz, João Victor Costa Mazzochin, João Leonardo Harres Dall Agnol, Lucas Caldeira de Oliveira, Marcelo Filipak, Luiz Antonio Zanlorensi, Marcos Belançon, Jefferson Oliva, Marcelo Teixeira, Dalcimar Casanova
{"title":"A Systematic Literature Review on Neonatal Fingerprint Recognition","authors":"Luiz Fernando Puttow Southier, Gustavo Alexandre Tuchlinowicz Nunes, João Henrique Pereira Machado, Matheus Buratti, Pedro Henrique de Viveiros Trentin, Wesley Augusto Catuzzo de Bona, Barbara de Oliveira Koop, Elioenai Diniz, João Victor Costa Mazzochin, João Leonardo Harres Dall Agnol, Lucas Caldeira de Oliveira, Marcelo Filipak, Luiz Antonio Zanlorensi, Marcos Belançon, Jefferson Oliva, Marcelo Teixeira, Dalcimar Casanova","doi":"10.1145/3735551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neonatal biometrics, especially those based on fingerprint traits, can potentially improve early childhood identification with decisive applications in healthcare, identity management, and other critical social domains. Although many biometric approaches to human recognition exist, most of them can not be directly applied to neonates. The main barrier is the reduced size of children’s biometric traits, which affects image quality as these traits are still developing. Another issue is the lack of child biometric databases, as a periodic recollection of images is a fundamental part of neonatal identification regarding the feasibility evaluation of temporal recognition. Several works can be found in the literature addressing some of these issues. However, there is still no systematic review allowing a general understanding of these solutions, discussing their links, gaps, comparisons, and open challenges. In this sense, this paper presents a systematic literature review on neonatal biometrics. In total, 1,878 papers were screened and classified, resulting in 45 being selected to be analyzed in this study. We detail and compare the results of datasets, scanners, methods, and techniques to achieve and improve neonatal recognition. Finally, research trends are identified and discussed based on the main gaps in the literature.","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3735551","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Neonatal biometrics, especially those based on fingerprint traits, can potentially improve early childhood identification with decisive applications in healthcare, identity management, and other critical social domains. Although many biometric approaches to human recognition exist, most of them can not be directly applied to neonates. The main barrier is the reduced size of children’s biometric traits, which affects image quality as these traits are still developing. Another issue is the lack of child biometric databases, as a periodic recollection of images is a fundamental part of neonatal identification regarding the feasibility evaluation of temporal recognition. Several works can be found in the literature addressing some of these issues. However, there is still no systematic review allowing a general understanding of these solutions, discussing their links, gaps, comparisons, and open challenges. In this sense, this paper presents a systematic literature review on neonatal biometrics. In total, 1,878 papers were screened and classified, resulting in 45 being selected to be analyzed in this study. We detail and compare the results of datasets, scanners, methods, and techniques to achieve and improve neonatal recognition. Finally, research trends are identified and discussed based on the main gaps in the literature.
期刊介绍:
ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods.
ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.