Hedging Multiple Price Uncertainty in Soybean Export

IF 2.3 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Siun Lee, Dmitry Vedenov
{"title":"Hedging Multiple Price Uncertainty in Soybean Export","authors":"Siun Lee,&nbsp;Dmitry Vedenov","doi":"10.1002/fut.22581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Exporting companies encounter various sources of price uncertainty and can choose between hedging each risk separately or jointly. This study analyzes the differences between these strategies in terms of their performance. For practical analysis, we assume a representative exporter in the US that ships soybeans to Europe and faces input price risk (domestic soybean price) and output price risk (Euro/US dollar exchange rate). Our study reveals that joint hedging typically enhances hedging effectiveness (<i>HE</i>) the most, although the benefits may be limited in specific circumstances. We also find that the baseline level of risk stemming from the soybean price movement plays a crucial role in determining the performance of the hedging strategy. Higher market risks, such as a high soybean price and increased price volatility, contribute to better <i>HE</i>. Conversely, when the initial risk is low, such as in cases of depreciated domestic currency value, significant improvement in <i>HE</i> is less likely. Joint hedging allows simultaneous response to multiple risks, but single-commodity hedging is faster in responding to individual price risks, especially when this risk originates from the commodity that is being hedged. However, if a firm opts for single hedging and faces a price risk from an unhedged source, a significant loss in <i>HE</i> occurs compared with joint hedging. The study also confirms that price dependence affects <i>HE</i>, with higher dependence between spot and futures prices resulting in more effective hedging. In cases of high dependence between the two commodities' prices, joint hedging performs relatively better than single-commodity hedging due to the presence of offsetting risks. Our findings suggest that the choice between joint and single hedging should be tailored to the specific risk exposures faced by firms in the soybean and foreign exchange (FX) markets. This decision should take into account factors, such as shock means, shock volatilities, and dependencies between commodity and FX rates.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Futures Markets","volume":"45 6","pages":"600-611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Futures Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fut.22581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exporting companies encounter various sources of price uncertainty and can choose between hedging each risk separately or jointly. This study analyzes the differences between these strategies in terms of their performance. For practical analysis, we assume a representative exporter in the US that ships soybeans to Europe and faces input price risk (domestic soybean price) and output price risk (Euro/US dollar exchange rate). Our study reveals that joint hedging typically enhances hedging effectiveness (HE) the most, although the benefits may be limited in specific circumstances. We also find that the baseline level of risk stemming from the soybean price movement plays a crucial role in determining the performance of the hedging strategy. Higher market risks, such as a high soybean price and increased price volatility, contribute to better HE. Conversely, when the initial risk is low, such as in cases of depreciated domestic currency value, significant improvement in HE is less likely. Joint hedging allows simultaneous response to multiple risks, but single-commodity hedging is faster in responding to individual price risks, especially when this risk originates from the commodity that is being hedged. However, if a firm opts for single hedging and faces a price risk from an unhedged source, a significant loss in HE occurs compared with joint hedging. The study also confirms that price dependence affects HE, with higher dependence between spot and futures prices resulting in more effective hedging. In cases of high dependence between the two commodities' prices, joint hedging performs relatively better than single-commodity hedging due to the presence of offsetting risks. Our findings suggest that the choice between joint and single hedging should be tailored to the specific risk exposures faced by firms in the soybean and foreign exchange (FX) markets. This decision should take into account factors, such as shock means, shock volatilities, and dependencies between commodity and FX rates.

大豆出口多重价格不确定性的对冲
出口公司会遇到各种各样的价格不确定性来源,可以选择单独或联合对冲每种风险。本研究分析了这些策略在绩效方面的差异。为了进行实际分析,我们假设美国的一家代表性出口商将大豆运往欧洲,并面临投入价格风险(国内大豆价格)和产出价格风险(欧元/美元汇率)。我们的研究表明,联合套期保值通常最能提高套期保值有效性(HE),尽管在特定情况下收益可能有限。我们还发现,源于大豆价格变动的基线风险水平在决定对冲策略的绩效方面起着至关重要的作用。较高的市场风险,如大豆价格高企和价格波动加剧,有助于提高HE。相反,当初始风险较低时,例如在本币贬值的情况下,HE显着改善的可能性较小。联合套期保值可以同时应对多种风险,但单一商品套期保值对单个价格风险的反应更快,尤其是当这种风险来自被套期保值的商品时。然而,如果公司选择单一套期保值并面临来自未套期保值来源的价格风险,则与联合套期保值相比,HE会发生重大损失。研究还证实,价格依赖影响HE,现货和期货价格之间的依赖程度越高,对冲效果越好。在两种商品价格高度依赖的情况下,由于存在抵消风险,联合对冲的效果相对优于单一商品对冲。我们的研究结果表明,在联合对冲和单一对冲之间的选择应该根据企业在大豆和外汇市场上面临的具体风险敞口进行调整。这一决定应考虑各种因素,如冲击手段、冲击波动性以及大宗商品和外汇汇率之间的依赖关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Futures Markets
Journal of Futures Markets BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.80%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Futures Markets chronicles the latest developments in financial futures and derivatives. It publishes timely, innovative articles written by leading finance academics and professionals. Coverage ranges from the highly practical to theoretical topics that include futures, derivatives, risk management and control, financial engineering, new financial instruments, hedging strategies, analysis of trading systems, legal, accounting, and regulatory issues, and portfolio optimization. This publication contains the very latest research from the top experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信