Effects of Fear of Crime on Social Acceptance Under Social Conflict Perceptions Toward Ex-Prisoners: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Chun Xia, Jia Xu, Lu Ma
{"title":"Effects of Fear of Crime on Social Acceptance Under Social Conflict Perceptions Toward Ex-Prisoners: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Chun Xia,&nbsp;Jia Xu,&nbsp;Lu Ma","doi":"10.1155/hsc/7964639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Fear of crime (FOC) decreases a person’s social acceptance of ex-prisoners (SAX). However, the extent to which FOC impacts SAX is unclear. Using a national sample, this study aimed to explore the extent to which (1) FOC impacts SAX by elevating social conflict perception and (2) social equality moderates the association between FOC and social conflict perception. Using bootstrapping, a moderated mediation effect model was constructed to analyze the extent to which FOC impacts SAX and the potential mediating and possible moderating effects of social conflict perception and social equality, respectively. The findings reveal that FOC significantly and negatively impacts SAX after controlling for sex, age, educational level, marital and subjective socioeconomic statuses, Internet utilization, and victimization experience factors. The results indicate that people with high FOC are less willing to accept ex-prisoners, an effect partly explained by the mediation of social conflict perception, and that social equality plays a moderating role between FOC and social conflict perception. This study contributes to the literature by extending research on the social effects of FOC, as to date, most research has focused on the FOC attitude that favors the punishment of offenders, and there is hardly any research on whether a hostile FOC attitude could spill over toward ex-prisoners in society. In addition, this study explains the association between FOC and the social acceptance of targeted social groups and provides an innovative explanation for a precondition based on the inner relationship between FOC and SAX, supported by empirical evidence.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/7964639","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/7964639","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fear of crime (FOC) decreases a person’s social acceptance of ex-prisoners (SAX). However, the extent to which FOC impacts SAX is unclear. Using a national sample, this study aimed to explore the extent to which (1) FOC impacts SAX by elevating social conflict perception and (2) social equality moderates the association between FOC and social conflict perception. Using bootstrapping, a moderated mediation effect model was constructed to analyze the extent to which FOC impacts SAX and the potential mediating and possible moderating effects of social conflict perception and social equality, respectively. The findings reveal that FOC significantly and negatively impacts SAX after controlling for sex, age, educational level, marital and subjective socioeconomic statuses, Internet utilization, and victimization experience factors. The results indicate that people with high FOC are less willing to accept ex-prisoners, an effect partly explained by the mediation of social conflict perception, and that social equality plays a moderating role between FOC and social conflict perception. This study contributes to the literature by extending research on the social effects of FOC, as to date, most research has focused on the FOC attitude that favors the punishment of offenders, and there is hardly any research on whether a hostile FOC attitude could spill over toward ex-prisoners in society. In addition, this study explains the association between FOC and the social acceptance of targeted social groups and provides an innovative explanation for a precondition based on the inner relationship between FOC and SAX, supported by empirical evidence.

Abstract Image

刑满释放人员社会冲突知觉下犯罪恐惧对社会接受的影响:一项横断面研究
对犯罪的恐惧(FOC)降低了一个人对前囚犯(SAX)的社会接受度。然而,FOC对SAX的影响程度尚不清楚。本研究以全国为样本,旨在探讨(1)FOC通过提升社会冲突感知来影响SAX的程度,以及(2)社会平等调节FOC与社会冲突感知之间的关系。运用自举法构建了有调节的中介效应模型,分析了FOC对SAX的影响程度以及社会冲突感知和社会平等的潜在中介作用和可能的调节作用。结果发现,在控制了性别、年龄、受教育程度、婚姻和主观社会经济状况、互联网使用和受害经历等因素后,FOC对SAX有显著的负向影响。结果表明,FOC高的人对刑事犯的接纳意愿较低,社会冲突知觉的中介作用可以部分解释这一效应,社会平等在FOC与社会冲突知觉之间起调节作用。本研究扩充了对FOC社会效应的研究,迄今为止,大多数研究都集中在有利于惩罚罪犯的FOC态度上,很少有关于敌意的FOC态度是否会在社会上蔓延到出狱人员的研究。此外,本研究解释了FOC与目标社会群体的社会接受度之间的关系,并基于FOC与SAX之间的内在关系,为一个前提条件提供了创新的解释,并有实证支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信