Stefan Wolter , Jessica Rebecca Rausch , Maximilian Julius Engelke , Nikica Hennes , Abhinav Dhake , Hendrik Groß , Pia Immoor
{"title":"Evaluation of carsickness countermeasures in a test track study","authors":"Stefan Wolter , Jessica Rebecca Rausch , Maximilian Julius Engelke , Nikica Hennes , Abhinav Dhake , Hendrik Groß , Pia Immoor","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.04.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carsickness is an inconvenience to many people traveling in a car and might become even more problematic with increasing vehicle automation. As part of a user study, several countermeasures were developed and evaluated. A modified test car with participants seated as passengers was driven around a standardized, enclosed test track. A reading task was employed to elicit carsickness. The countermeasures included (1) visual cues about upcoming vehicle motions, (2) so-called non-read zones on demanding parts of the test track during which participants were supposed not to read and finally (3) listening to an audiobook. Several measures were employed to quantify participants’ state of distress. The continuously asked Misery Scale ratings revealed a steady rise of carsickness levels in the baseline condition without any countermeasure (<em>p</em> < 0.001). The countermeasure condition (1) revealed to systematically lower the carsickness level (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Though with a moderate effect size (<em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.074). The countermeasures (2) and (3) both decreased the Misery Scale ratings much more distinctively (<em>η<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.369). The obtained results show that visual cues are helpful in decreasing carsickness. However, switching to the audio channel or simply stopping the reading task during demanding road stretches is much more helpful.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"113 ","pages":"Pages 250-262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825001548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Carsickness is an inconvenience to many people traveling in a car and might become even more problematic with increasing vehicle automation. As part of a user study, several countermeasures were developed and evaluated. A modified test car with participants seated as passengers was driven around a standardized, enclosed test track. A reading task was employed to elicit carsickness. The countermeasures included (1) visual cues about upcoming vehicle motions, (2) so-called non-read zones on demanding parts of the test track during which participants were supposed not to read and finally (3) listening to an audiobook. Several measures were employed to quantify participants’ state of distress. The continuously asked Misery Scale ratings revealed a steady rise of carsickness levels in the baseline condition without any countermeasure (p < 0.001). The countermeasure condition (1) revealed to systematically lower the carsickness level (p < 0.001). Though with a moderate effect size (η2 = 0.074). The countermeasures (2) and (3) both decreased the Misery Scale ratings much more distinctively (η2 = 0.369). The obtained results show that visual cues are helpful in decreasing carsickness. However, switching to the audio channel or simply stopping the reading task during demanding road stretches is much more helpful.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.