Information sharing in supply chains from the market game perspective

IF 4.4 3区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Yinbo Feng, Jiamin Li
{"title":"Information sharing in supply chains from the market game perspective","authors":"Yinbo Feng,&nbsp;Jiamin Li","doi":"10.1007/s10479-025-06470-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the incentives for firms to vertically share information in a two-tier supply chain comprising a single supplier selling products to multiple retailers. We employ a wholesale market model based on the market-game mechanism, where the wholesale price is determined by both the supplier’s and retailers’ decisions. Our analysis considers two cases of private information: demand information held by the retailers and demand information held by the supplier. In the case where retailers have private demand information, we demonstrate that all retailers are willing to commit to sharing information when their information is homogeneous. When their information is heterogeneous, there may be only a portion of retailers willing to commit to sharing information. The equilibrium number of retailers who commit to sharing information is influenced by the degree of demand uncertainty, the consumer market size, and the unit cost for production. In particular, when demand uncertainty is sufficiently high and the unit cost is sufficiently large relative to the market size, all retailers are willing to share information. These findings are validated through numerical experiments conducted in general settings. Furthermore, our analysis illustrates that suppliers can incentivize retailers to share information by employing either a price-discrimination strategy or a revenue-sharing strategy. We also highlight the distinct impacts of these two strategies. In the case where the supplier holds private demand information, we show that information sharing benefits all supply chain members as well as the society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8215,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Operations Research","volume":"347 3","pages":"1311 - 1338"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10479-025-06470-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-025-06470-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the incentives for firms to vertically share information in a two-tier supply chain comprising a single supplier selling products to multiple retailers. We employ a wholesale market model based on the market-game mechanism, where the wholesale price is determined by both the supplier’s and retailers’ decisions. Our analysis considers two cases of private information: demand information held by the retailers and demand information held by the supplier. In the case where retailers have private demand information, we demonstrate that all retailers are willing to commit to sharing information when their information is homogeneous. When their information is heterogeneous, there may be only a portion of retailers willing to commit to sharing information. The equilibrium number of retailers who commit to sharing information is influenced by the degree of demand uncertainty, the consumer market size, and the unit cost for production. In particular, when demand uncertainty is sufficiently high and the unit cost is sufficiently large relative to the market size, all retailers are willing to share information. These findings are validated through numerical experiments conducted in general settings. Furthermore, our analysis illustrates that suppliers can incentivize retailers to share information by employing either a price-discrimination strategy or a revenue-sharing strategy. We also highlight the distinct impacts of these two strategies. In the case where the supplier holds private demand information, we show that information sharing benefits all supply chain members as well as the society.

市场博弈视角下的供应链信息共享
本文研究了由单一供应商向多个零售商销售产品组成的两层供应链中企业垂直共享信息的激励机制。我们采用基于市场博弈机制的批发市场模型,其中批发价格由供应商和零售商共同决定。我们的分析考虑了两种私人信息的情况:零售商持有的需求信息和供应商持有的需求信息。在零售商拥有私人需求信息的情况下,我们证明了当他们的信息是同质的时,所有的零售商都愿意承诺共享信息。当他们的信息是异构的,可能只有一部分零售商愿意承诺共享信息。承诺共享信息的零售商的均衡数量受需求不确定性程度、消费者市场规模和单位生产成本的影响。特别是当需求不确定性足够高,单位成本相对于市场规模足够大时,所有零售商都愿意共享信息。这些发现通过在一般环境下进行的数值实验得到了验证。此外,我们的分析表明,供应商可以通过采用价格歧视策略或收入共享策略来激励零售商共享信息。我们还强调了这两种战略的不同影响。在供应商拥有私人需求信息的情况下,我们证明了信息共享对所有供应链成员和社会都有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Operations Research
Annals of Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
596
审稿时长
8.4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Operations Research publishes peer-reviewed original articles dealing with key aspects of operations research, including theory, practice, and computation. The journal publishes full-length research articles, short notes, expositions and surveys, reports on computational studies, and case studies that present new and innovative practical applications. In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes periodic special volumes that focus on defined fields of operations research, ranging from the highly theoretical to the algorithmic and the applied. These volumes have one or more Guest Editors who are responsible for collecting the papers and overseeing the refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信