The phenomenographic outcome space of nurse educators' conception of nursing students collaboration in clinical skills lab

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Marie Stenberg, Mariette Bengtsson, Elisabeth Mangrio, Elisabeth Carlson
{"title":"The phenomenographic outcome space of nurse educators' conception of nursing students collaboration in clinical skills lab","authors":"Marie Stenberg,&nbsp;Mariette Bengtsson,&nbsp;Elisabeth Mangrio,&nbsp;Elisabeth Carlson","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to understand the variety of nurse educators' conceptions of nursing students' collaboration in clinical skills lab activities.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Collaborative learning has gained attention in nurse education as an educational approach that supports learning and professional development. However, research is deficient concerning nurse educators in faculty-based education and their conceptions of student collaboration.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The study adopted a phenomenographic approach. A purposeful sampling of nurse educators teaching in a skills lab setting was conducted at five universities in Sweden. Individual interviews with sixteen nurse educators were performed between November 2023 and February 2024. The interviews were analysed following phenomenographic procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four different description categories were identified: the purpose of collaboration, the didactic activities for collaboration, the student's intrapersonal skills, and the group activity skills. The outcome space presents the purpose of collaboration as the most complex descriptive category.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The educational purpose of collaboration should be settled by the faculty of nurse education and aligned to the collaborative requirements in the nursing profession. Introducing didactic activities specifically contextualized to the nursing profession and including peer observations and feedback in a formative manner may facilitate the development of collaboration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 106775"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725002114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to understand the variety of nurse educators' conceptions of nursing students' collaboration in clinical skills lab activities.

Background

Collaborative learning has gained attention in nurse education as an educational approach that supports learning and professional development. However, research is deficient concerning nurse educators in faculty-based education and their conceptions of student collaboration.

Method

The study adopted a phenomenographic approach. A purposeful sampling of nurse educators teaching in a skills lab setting was conducted at five universities in Sweden. Individual interviews with sixteen nurse educators were performed between November 2023 and February 2024. The interviews were analysed following phenomenographic procedures.

Results

Four different description categories were identified: the purpose of collaboration, the didactic activities for collaboration, the student's intrapersonal skills, and the group activity skills. The outcome space presents the purpose of collaboration as the most complex descriptive category.

Conclusion

The educational purpose of collaboration should be settled by the faculty of nurse education and aligned to the collaborative requirements in the nursing profession. Introducing didactic activities specifically contextualized to the nursing profession and including peer observations and feedback in a formative manner may facilitate the development of collaboration.
临床技能实验室护生合作理念的现象学结果空间
目的了解护理教育者对护生在临床技能实验室活动中合作的不同看法。协作学习作为一种支持学习和专业发展的教育方法,在护士教育中受到关注。然而,关于护士教育工作者在教师本位教育和他们的学生合作的概念的研究是缺乏的。方法采用现象学方法。在瑞典的五所大学进行了有目的的护士教育工作者在技能实验室教学的抽样调查。在2023年11月至2024年2月期间对16名护士教育者进行了个人访谈。访谈按照现象学程序进行分析。结果确定了四个不同的描述类别:合作的目的、合作的教学活动、学生的人际关系技能和小组活动技能。结果空间将协作的目的作为最复杂的描述类别呈现。结论协作教学的目的应由护理教育教师确定,并与护理专业的协作要求相一致。引入专门针对护理专业的教学活动,并以形成性的方式包括同伴观察和反馈,可以促进合作的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信