D. Bodansky , V. Gandbhir , N. Modi , J. Brookes , M. Rathinam , M. Pullagura
{"title":"Single-incision anatomic technique yields good outcomes in acute and chronic distal biceps avulsions alike","authors":"D. Bodansky , V. Gandbhir , N. Modi , J. Brookes , M. Rathinam , M. Pullagura","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Distal biceps tendon ruptures can be treated with a single incision intervention, fixed with a combination of devices. Shorter time to surgery is expected to yield better results. Our hypothesis was that the timing of surgery whether within 4 weeks or beyond does not affect return to full work, post-operative range of motion or outcome scores.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The retrospective cohort consisted of consecutive adult patients referred to a U.K. hospital from 2012 to 2019 and received single incision anatomic repair for distal biceps rupture. Patients were stratified into two groups: an acute group, that received operation within 4 weeks and chronic group, beyond 4 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>52 patients were included, with 37 acute and 15 chronic. All participants were male, with a mean age of 43.5 (±8.01 SD). Patients underwent surgery at median of 6 days (Range 0–26) in acute group compared to median of 47 days (Range 29–147) in chronic group (p < 0.00001). No significant differences were found as regards post-operative range of motion, QuickDASH scores and return to full work.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The timing of surgery whether within 4 weeks or beyond does not affect return to full work, functional outcome or post-operative range of motion.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Level II.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 103042"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225001407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Distal biceps tendon ruptures can be treated with a single incision intervention, fixed with a combination of devices. Shorter time to surgery is expected to yield better results. Our hypothesis was that the timing of surgery whether within 4 weeks or beyond does not affect return to full work, post-operative range of motion or outcome scores.
Methods
The retrospective cohort consisted of consecutive adult patients referred to a U.K. hospital from 2012 to 2019 and received single incision anatomic repair for distal biceps rupture. Patients were stratified into two groups: an acute group, that received operation within 4 weeks and chronic group, beyond 4 weeks.
Results
52 patients were included, with 37 acute and 15 chronic. All participants were male, with a mean age of 43.5 (±8.01 SD). Patients underwent surgery at median of 6 days (Range 0–26) in acute group compared to median of 47 days (Range 29–147) in chronic group (p < 0.00001). No significant differences were found as regards post-operative range of motion, QuickDASH scores and return to full work.
Conclusion
The timing of surgery whether within 4 weeks or beyond does not affect return to full work, functional outcome or post-operative range of motion.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.