{"title":"The Evolution of Sequence Specificity in a DNA Binding Protein Family","authors":"Meghna Nandy , Madhumitha Krishnaswamy , Mohak Sharda , Aswin Sai Narain Seshasayee","doi":"10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transcriptional regulation enables bacteria to adjust to its environment. This is driven by transcription factors (TFs), which display DNA site recognition specificity with some flexibility built in. TFs, however, are not considered essential to a minimal cellular life. How did they evolve? It has been hypothesized that TFs evolve by gaining specificity (and other functions) on a background of non-specific chromosome structuring proteins. We used the IHF/HU family of DNA binding proteins, in which IHF binds DNA in a sequence-specific manner, whereas HU binds more indiscriminately, to test this hypothesis. We show that HUβ has been present from the bacterial root, while both IHF subunits emerged much later and diversified in <em>Proteobacteria</em>, with HUα having possibly arisen from transfer events in <em>Gammaproteobacteria</em>. By reconstructing ancestral sequences <em>in-silico</em> on a rooted phylogeny of IHF/HU we show that the common ancestor of this family was probably HU-like and therefore non-specific in binding DNA. IHF evolved from a branch of HU after HU had substantially diverged. Various residues characteristic of IHFα and shown to be involved in specific sequence recognition (at least in <em>E. coli</em>) have likely been co-opted from preexisting residues in HU, while those residues of IHFβ have likely evolved independently, suggesting that each of the IHF subunits has undergone different trajectories to acquire their DNA binding properties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Biology","volume":"437 14","pages":"Article 169177"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283625002438","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Transcriptional regulation enables bacteria to adjust to its environment. This is driven by transcription factors (TFs), which display DNA site recognition specificity with some flexibility built in. TFs, however, are not considered essential to a minimal cellular life. How did they evolve? It has been hypothesized that TFs evolve by gaining specificity (and other functions) on a background of non-specific chromosome structuring proteins. We used the IHF/HU family of DNA binding proteins, in which IHF binds DNA in a sequence-specific manner, whereas HU binds more indiscriminately, to test this hypothesis. We show that HUβ has been present from the bacterial root, while both IHF subunits emerged much later and diversified in Proteobacteria, with HUα having possibly arisen from transfer events in Gammaproteobacteria. By reconstructing ancestral sequences in-silico on a rooted phylogeny of IHF/HU we show that the common ancestor of this family was probably HU-like and therefore non-specific in binding DNA. IHF evolved from a branch of HU after HU had substantially diverged. Various residues characteristic of IHFα and shown to be involved in specific sequence recognition (at least in E. coli) have likely been co-opted from preexisting residues in HU, while those residues of IHFβ have likely evolved independently, suggesting that each of the IHF subunits has undergone different trajectories to acquire their DNA binding properties.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Molecular Biology (JMB) provides high quality, comprehensive and broad coverage in all areas of molecular biology. The journal publishes original scientific research papers that provide mechanistic and functional insights and report a significant advance to the field. The journal encourages the submission of multidisciplinary studies that use complementary experimental and computational approaches to address challenging biological questions.
Research areas include but are not limited to: Biomolecular interactions, signaling networks, systems biology; Cell cycle, cell growth, cell differentiation; Cell death, autophagy; Cell signaling and regulation; Chemical biology; Computational biology, in combination with experimental studies; DNA replication, repair, and recombination; Development, regenerative biology, mechanistic and functional studies of stem cells; Epigenetics, chromatin structure and function; Gene expression; Membrane processes, cell surface proteins and cell-cell interactions; Methodological advances, both experimental and theoretical, including databases; Microbiology, virology, and interactions with the host or environment; Microbiota mechanistic and functional studies; Nuclear organization; Post-translational modifications, proteomics; Processing and function of biologically important macromolecules and complexes; Molecular basis of disease; RNA processing, structure and functions of non-coding RNAs, transcription; Sorting, spatiotemporal organization, trafficking; Structural biology; Synthetic biology; Translation, protein folding, chaperones, protein degradation and quality control.