The Evolution of Sequence Specificity in a DNA Binding Protein Family

IF 4.7 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Meghna Nandy , Madhumitha Krishnaswamy , Mohak Sharda , Aswin Sai Narain Seshasayee
{"title":"The Evolution of Sequence Specificity in a DNA Binding Protein Family","authors":"Meghna Nandy ,&nbsp;Madhumitha Krishnaswamy ,&nbsp;Mohak Sharda ,&nbsp;Aswin Sai Narain Seshasayee","doi":"10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transcriptional regulation enables bacteria to adjust to its environment. This is driven by transcription factors (TFs), which display DNA site recognition specificity with some flexibility built in. TFs, however, are not considered essential to a minimal cellular life. How did they evolve? It has been hypothesized that TFs evolve by gaining specificity (and other functions) on a background of non-specific chromosome structuring proteins. We used the IHF/HU family of DNA binding proteins, in which IHF binds DNA in a sequence-specific manner, whereas HU binds more indiscriminately, to test this hypothesis. We show that HUβ has been present from the bacterial root, while both IHF subunits emerged much later and diversified in <em>Proteobacteria</em>, with HUα having possibly arisen from transfer events in <em>Gammaproteobacteria</em>. By reconstructing ancestral sequences <em>in-silico</em> on a rooted phylogeny of IHF/HU we show that the common ancestor of this family was probably HU-like and therefore non-specific in binding DNA. IHF evolved from a branch of HU after HU had substantially diverged. Various residues characteristic of IHFα and shown to be involved in specific sequence recognition (at least in <em>E. coli</em>) have likely been co-opted from preexisting residues in HU, while those residues of IHFβ have likely evolved independently, suggesting that each of the IHF subunits has undergone different trajectories to acquire their DNA binding properties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Biology","volume":"437 14","pages":"Article 169177"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283625002438","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcriptional regulation enables bacteria to adjust to its environment. This is driven by transcription factors (TFs), which display DNA site recognition specificity with some flexibility built in. TFs, however, are not considered essential to a minimal cellular life. How did they evolve? It has been hypothesized that TFs evolve by gaining specificity (and other functions) on a background of non-specific chromosome structuring proteins. We used the IHF/HU family of DNA binding proteins, in which IHF binds DNA in a sequence-specific manner, whereas HU binds more indiscriminately, to test this hypothesis. We show that HUβ has been present from the bacterial root, while both IHF subunits emerged much later and diversified in Proteobacteria, with HUα having possibly arisen from transfer events in Gammaproteobacteria. By reconstructing ancestral sequences in-silico on a rooted phylogeny of IHF/HU we show that the common ancestor of this family was probably HU-like and therefore non-specific in binding DNA. IHF evolved from a branch of HU after HU had substantially diverged. Various residues characteristic of IHFα and shown to be involved in specific sequence recognition (at least in E. coli) have likely been co-opted from preexisting residues in HU, while those residues of IHFβ have likely evolved independently, suggesting that each of the IHF subunits has undergone different trajectories to acquire their DNA binding properties.

Abstract Image

DNA结合蛋白家族序列特异性的进化
转录调节使细菌能够适应环境。这是由转录因子(TFs)驱动的,转录因子显示DNA位点识别的特异性,并具有一定的灵活性。然而,tf并不被认为是最小细胞生命所必需的。它们是如何进化的?据推测,tf是通过在非特异性染色体结构蛋白的背景下获得特异性(和其他功能)而进化的。我们使用IHF/HU家族的DNA结合蛋白来验证这一假设,其中IHF以序列特异性的方式结合DNA,而HU以不加区分的方式结合DNA。我们发现,HUβ从细菌根部开始就存在,而这两个IHF亚基在变形菌门中出现得更晚,并且多样化,而HUα可能来自γ变形菌门的转移事件。通过在IHF/HU的根系统发育上重建祖先序列,我们表明该家族的共同祖先可能与HU相似,因此在结合DNA上是非特异性的。IHF是在HU发生实质性分化后由HU的一个分支演变而来的。各种具有IHFα特征并参与特定序列识别的残基(至少在大肠杆菌中)可能是从HU中预先存在的残基中被选择出来的,而IHFβ的这些残基可能是独立进化的,这表明每个IHF亚基都经历了不同的轨迹来获得它们的DNA结合特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Molecular Biology
Journal of Molecular Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
412
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Molecular Biology (JMB) provides high quality, comprehensive and broad coverage in all areas of molecular biology. The journal publishes original scientific research papers that provide mechanistic and functional insights and report a significant advance to the field. The journal encourages the submission of multidisciplinary studies that use complementary experimental and computational approaches to address challenging biological questions. Research areas include but are not limited to: Biomolecular interactions, signaling networks, systems biology; Cell cycle, cell growth, cell differentiation; Cell death, autophagy; Cell signaling and regulation; Chemical biology; Computational biology, in combination with experimental studies; DNA replication, repair, and recombination; Development, regenerative biology, mechanistic and functional studies of stem cells; Epigenetics, chromatin structure and function; Gene expression; Membrane processes, cell surface proteins and cell-cell interactions; Methodological advances, both experimental and theoretical, including databases; Microbiology, virology, and interactions with the host or environment; Microbiota mechanistic and functional studies; Nuclear organization; Post-translational modifications, proteomics; Processing and function of biologically important macromolecules and complexes; Molecular basis of disease; RNA processing, structure and functions of non-coding RNAs, transcription; Sorting, spatiotemporal organization, trafficking; Structural biology; Synthetic biology; Translation, protein folding, chaperones, protein degradation and quality control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信