Jaganmoy Jodder , Axel Hofmann , Marlina A. Elburg , Rebeun Ngobeli , Trond H. Torsvik
{"title":"Debunking the myth of a single Iron Ore Group in the Singhbhum Craton, India","authors":"Jaganmoy Jodder , Axel Hofmann , Marlina A. Elburg , Rebeun Ngobeli , Trond H. Torsvik","doi":"10.1016/j.precamres.2025.107800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Archaean cratonic cover successions with well-preserved banded iron-formations (BIF) and shales provide a crucial window into early Earth surface processes. Here, we report on the intra-cratonic volcano-sedimentary sequences of the Koira and Simlipal groups of the Singhbhum Craton of India, regarded by some to be equivalent of Palaeoarchaean BIF-bearing greenstone successions collectively referred to as Iron Ore Group. However, field relationships and precise LA-Q-ICP-MS U-Pb detrital zircon ages from basal siliciclastic units of the Koira Group, non-conformably overlying Palaeo- to Mesoarchaean granitoid-greenstone basement, record a maximum depositional age of ca. 2.86 Ga. Sandstone intercalated with shale and banded iron formation of the Koira Group yields a maximum depositional age of ca. 2.68 Ga, placing the deposition of the iron formation and correlative units firmly into the Neoarchaean. The data therefore call for separate BIF–bearing sequences of Palaeoarchaean and Neoarchaean age, thus debunking the persistent myth of a single Iron Ore Group in the Singhbhum Craton of India. It further underscores similarities in the evolution of the Kaapvaal, Pilbara and Singhbhum cratons, which emerged in Mesoarchaean times to accommodate shallow-marine strata and sub-aerial flood basalts in an intra-continental setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49674,"journal":{"name":"Precambrian Research","volume":"423 ","pages":"Article 107800"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precambrian Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926825001263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Archaean cratonic cover successions with well-preserved banded iron-formations (BIF) and shales provide a crucial window into early Earth surface processes. Here, we report on the intra-cratonic volcano-sedimentary sequences of the Koira and Simlipal groups of the Singhbhum Craton of India, regarded by some to be equivalent of Palaeoarchaean BIF-bearing greenstone successions collectively referred to as Iron Ore Group. However, field relationships and precise LA-Q-ICP-MS U-Pb detrital zircon ages from basal siliciclastic units of the Koira Group, non-conformably overlying Palaeo- to Mesoarchaean granitoid-greenstone basement, record a maximum depositional age of ca. 2.86 Ga. Sandstone intercalated with shale and banded iron formation of the Koira Group yields a maximum depositional age of ca. 2.68 Ga, placing the deposition of the iron formation and correlative units firmly into the Neoarchaean. The data therefore call for separate BIF–bearing sequences of Palaeoarchaean and Neoarchaean age, thus debunking the persistent myth of a single Iron Ore Group in the Singhbhum Craton of India. It further underscores similarities in the evolution of the Kaapvaal, Pilbara and Singhbhum cratons, which emerged in Mesoarchaean times to accommodate shallow-marine strata and sub-aerial flood basalts in an intra-continental setting.
期刊介绍:
Precambrian Research publishes studies on all aspects of the early stages of the composition, structure and evolution of the Earth and its planetary neighbours. With a focus on process-oriented and comparative studies, it covers, but is not restricted to, subjects such as:
(1) Chemical, biological, biochemical and cosmochemical evolution; the origin of life; the evolution of the oceans and atmosphere; the early fossil record; palaeobiology;
(2) Geochronology and isotope and elemental geochemistry;
(3) Precambrian mineral deposits;
(4) Geophysical aspects of the early Earth and Precambrian terrains;
(5) Nature, formation and evolution of the Precambrian lithosphere and mantle including magmatic, depositional, metamorphic and tectonic processes.
In addition, the editors particularly welcome integrated process-oriented studies that involve a combination of the above fields and comparative studies that demonstrate the effect of Precambrian evolution on Phanerozoic earth system processes.
Regional and localised studies of Precambrian phenomena are considered appropriate only when the detail and quality allow illustration of a wider process, or when significant gaps in basic knowledge of a particular area can be filled.