The effectiveness of Nurture Groups at supporting social and emotional outcomes: a systematic review

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Bethan Jones , Henry Wood-Downie , Dennis Golm
{"title":"The effectiveness of Nurture Groups at supporting social and emotional outcomes: a systematic review","authors":"Bethan Jones ,&nbsp;Henry Wood-Downie ,&nbsp;Dennis Golm","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nurture Groups are a school-based attachment-focused intervention for young people with social and emotional, or mental health needs who may have experienced adversity. The aim of the current review was to systematically evaluate the evidence for Nurture group provision to improve social and emotional outcomes in children and young people across primary and secondary school settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Studies were included if they had been published in a peer-reviewed journal, participants were children and young people of school age, the study design was quantitative, evaluating the effectiveness of a Nurture Group intervention and had at least one outcome measure related to social and emotional outcomes. Screening was conducted by the first author and a voluntary research assistant. Conflicts were resolved via discussion. A systematic search across six databases identified 14 studies for inclusion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings suggest that Nurture Group provision is, overall, effective at improving pupils’ social and emotional outcomes. However, improvements were not found consistently across both sections of the Boxall Profile, the primary tool used to measure progress within Nurture Groups. Differential effects were also found in relation to some pupil-level characteristics, namely age, baseline score, and gender.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The findings highlighted the need to conduct further research to examine such factors, as well as to explore the possible mechanisms for change underlying Nurture Group provision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 108278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925001616","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nurture Groups are a school-based attachment-focused intervention for young people with social and emotional, or mental health needs who may have experienced adversity. The aim of the current review was to systematically evaluate the evidence for Nurture group provision to improve social and emotional outcomes in children and young people across primary and secondary school settings.

Methods

Studies were included if they had been published in a peer-reviewed journal, participants were children and young people of school age, the study design was quantitative, evaluating the effectiveness of a Nurture Group intervention and had at least one outcome measure related to social and emotional outcomes. Screening was conducted by the first author and a voluntary research assistant. Conflicts were resolved via discussion. A systematic search across six databases identified 14 studies for inclusion.

Results

Findings suggest that Nurture Group provision is, overall, effective at improving pupils’ social and emotional outcomes. However, improvements were not found consistently across both sections of the Boxall Profile, the primary tool used to measure progress within Nurture Groups. Differential effects were also found in relation to some pupil-level characteristics, namely age, baseline score, and gender.

Discussion

The findings highlighted the need to conduct further research to examine such factors, as well as to explore the possible mechanisms for change underlying Nurture Group provision.
培育小组在支持社会和情感结果方面的有效性:系统回顾
背景培育小组是一种以学校为基础的以依恋为中心的干预措施,针对可能经历过逆境的有社会和情感或心理健康需求的年轻人。当前回顾的目的是系统地评估培育小组提供的证据,以改善中小学环境中儿童和青少年的社会和情感结果。方法研究纳入了在同行评审期刊上发表的研究,参与者是儿童和学龄青少年,研究设计是定量的,评估培育小组干预的有效性,至少有一个与社会和情感结果相关的结果测量。筛选由第一作者和一名志愿研究助理进行。冲突通过讨论得到解决。在6个数据库中进行了系统搜索,确定了14项研究。研究结果表明,总体而言,培育小组的提供在改善学生的社交和情感结果方面是有效的。然而,在Boxall Profile的两个部分中并没有发现一致的改进,Boxall Profile是用来衡量培育小组进展的主要工具。差异效应也被发现与一些学生水平特征有关,即年龄、基线得分和性别。讨论研究结果强调有必要进行进一步的研究,以检查这些因素,并探讨教养组提供的潜在变化机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信