Surfacing the urban underground: Knowledge production, modes of envisioning, and politics of visibility

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Alexander Craig-Thompson, Magdalena Kuchler
{"title":"Surfacing the urban underground: Knowledge production, modes of envisioning, and politics of visibility","authors":"Alexander Craig-Thompson,&nbsp;Magdalena Kuchler","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The subsurface is increasingly considered the final frontier of urban development, with marked potential to improve urban spatial problems, resilience and sustainability. At the same time, the literature recognises Urban Underground Space (UUS) as a finite and multi-functional resource that requires holistic and strategic management. However, knowledge of the invisible urban subsurface is obscured by secrecy, fragmented across disciplines, and built on extractive knowledge practices. A lack of long-term planning of UUS perpetuates a first-come-first-served development approach that risks jeopardising future infrastructures and urban sustainability. To address this, there is an effort to gather ever more subsurface data, rendering the invisible visible to urban decision-makers. We analyse and reflect on the limits of current underground planning knowledge, responding to the socio-political gap in UUS literature. We focus on the ontological challenges facing sustainable planning of UUS and present the need to critique how practices of power and politics in UUS knowledge production envision subsurface futures. We present four <em>modes of envisioning</em> the urban subsurface, which negotiate its characteristics of invisibility and complexity to shape volumetric potential and possibility. We argue that governance of this invisible urban frontier requires deeper reflection on how the subsurface is rendered visible and in anticipation of which futures. We suggest that a more nuanced lens is required to account for the interplay between power, depth, and volume through the intersections of plural urban subsurface imaginaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 104301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subsurface is increasingly considered the final frontier of urban development, with marked potential to improve urban spatial problems, resilience and sustainability. At the same time, the literature recognises Urban Underground Space (UUS) as a finite and multi-functional resource that requires holistic and strategic management. However, knowledge of the invisible urban subsurface is obscured by secrecy, fragmented across disciplines, and built on extractive knowledge practices. A lack of long-term planning of UUS perpetuates a first-come-first-served development approach that risks jeopardising future infrastructures and urban sustainability. To address this, there is an effort to gather ever more subsurface data, rendering the invisible visible to urban decision-makers. We analyse and reflect on the limits of current underground planning knowledge, responding to the socio-political gap in UUS literature. We focus on the ontological challenges facing sustainable planning of UUS and present the need to critique how practices of power and politics in UUS knowledge production envision subsurface futures. We present four modes of envisioning the urban subsurface, which negotiate its characteristics of invisibility and complexity to shape volumetric potential and possibility. We argue that governance of this invisible urban frontier requires deeper reflection on how the subsurface is rendered visible and in anticipation of which futures. We suggest that a more nuanced lens is required to account for the interplay between power, depth, and volume through the intersections of plural urban subsurface imaginaries.
地表城市地下:知识生产、设想模式和可见性政治
地下空间越来越被认为是城市发展的最后前沿,在改善城市空间问题、弹性和可持续性方面具有显著的潜力。同时,文献认识到城市地下空间(UUS)是一种有限的多功能资源,需要整体和战略管理。然而,关于无形的城市地下的知识被秘密所掩盖,跨学科的碎片化,并建立在提取知识实践的基础上。美国缺乏长期规划,使先到先得的发展方式永久化,这可能危及未来的基础设施和城市的可持续性。为了解决这个问题,人们正在努力收集更多的地下数据,使城市决策者能够看到不可见的数据。我们分析和反思当前地下规划知识的局限性,以回应美国文献中的社会政治差距。我们专注于UUS可持续规划面临的本体论挑战,并提出了批判UUS知识生产中的权力和政治实践如何展望地下未来的必要性。我们提出了四种设想城市地下的模式,这些模式协商了其不可见性和复杂性的特征,以塑造体积的潜力和可能性。我们认为,对这一看不见的城市边界的治理需要更深入地思考地下如何变得可见,以及对未来的预期。我们建议需要一个更细致入微的视角,通过多个城市地下想象的交叉点来解释力量、深度和体积之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信