Lucas Kissling, Amina Mollaysa, Sharan Janjuha, Nicolas Mathis, Kim F. Marquart, Yanik Weber, Woohyun J. Moon, Paulo J. C. Lin, Steven H. Y. Fan, Hiromi Muramatsu, Máté Vadovics, Ahmed Allam, Norbert Pardi, Ying K. Tam, Michael Krauthammer, Gerald Schwank
{"title":"Predicting adenine base editing efficiencies in different cellular contexts by deep learning","authors":"Lucas Kissling, Amina Mollaysa, Sharan Janjuha, Nicolas Mathis, Kim F. Marquart, Yanik Weber, Woohyun J. Moon, Paulo J. C. Lin, Steven H. Y. Fan, Hiromi Muramatsu, Máté Vadovics, Ahmed Allam, Norbert Pardi, Ying K. Tam, Michael Krauthammer, Gerald Schwank","doi":"10.1186/s13059-025-03586-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adenine base editors (ABEs) enable the conversion of A•T to G•C base pairs. Since the sequence of the target locus influences base editing efficiency, efforts have been made to develop computational models that can predict base editing outcomes based on the targeted sequence. However, these models were trained on base editing datasets generated in cell lines and their predictive power for base editing in primary cells in vivo remains uncertain. In this study, we conduct base editing screens using SpRY-ABEmax and SpRY-ABE8e to target 2,195 pathogenic mutations with a total of 12,000 guide RNAs in cell lines and in the murine liver. We observe strong correlations between in vitro datasets generated by ABE-mRNA electroporation into HEK293T cells and in vivo datasets generated by adeno-associated virus (AAV)- or lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-mediated nucleoside-modified mRNA delivery (Spearman R = 0.83–0.92). We subsequently develop BEDICT2.0, a deep learning model that predicts adenine base editing efficiencies with high accuracy in cell lines (R = 0.60–0.94) and in the liver (R = 0.62–0.81). In conclusion, our work confirms that adenine base editing holds considerable potential for correcting a large fraction of pathogenic mutations. We also provide BEDICT2.0 – a robust computational model that helps identify sgRNA-ABE combinations capable of achieving high on-target editing with minimal bystander effects in both in vitro and in vivo settings.","PeriodicalId":12611,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-025-03586-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Adenine base editors (ABEs) enable the conversion of A•T to G•C base pairs. Since the sequence of the target locus influences base editing efficiency, efforts have been made to develop computational models that can predict base editing outcomes based on the targeted sequence. However, these models were trained on base editing datasets generated in cell lines and their predictive power for base editing in primary cells in vivo remains uncertain. In this study, we conduct base editing screens using SpRY-ABEmax and SpRY-ABE8e to target 2,195 pathogenic mutations with a total of 12,000 guide RNAs in cell lines and in the murine liver. We observe strong correlations between in vitro datasets generated by ABE-mRNA electroporation into HEK293T cells and in vivo datasets generated by adeno-associated virus (AAV)- or lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-mediated nucleoside-modified mRNA delivery (Spearman R = 0.83–0.92). We subsequently develop BEDICT2.0, a deep learning model that predicts adenine base editing efficiencies with high accuracy in cell lines (R = 0.60–0.94) and in the liver (R = 0.62–0.81). In conclusion, our work confirms that adenine base editing holds considerable potential for correcting a large fraction of pathogenic mutations. We also provide BEDICT2.0 – a robust computational model that helps identify sgRNA-ABE combinations capable of achieving high on-target editing with minimal bystander effects in both in vitro and in vivo settings.
Genome BiologyBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
241
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍:
Genome Biology stands as a premier platform for exceptional research across all domains of biology and biomedicine, explored through a genomic and post-genomic lens.
With an impressive impact factor of 12.3 (2022),* the journal secures its position as the 3rd-ranked research journal in the Genetics and Heredity category and the 2nd-ranked research journal in the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology category by Thomson Reuters. Notably, Genome Biology holds the distinction of being the highest-ranked open-access journal in this category.
Our dedicated team of highly trained in-house Editors collaborates closely with our esteemed Editorial Board of international experts, ensuring the journal remains on the forefront of scientific advances and community standards. Regular engagement with researchers at conferences and institute visits underscores our commitment to staying abreast of the latest developments in the field.