The Impact of Pluralistic Ignorance on Knowledge-Sharing Behaviour in Virtual Teams

IF 6.9 3区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Hao-Fan Chumg, Wen-Chin Tsao, Louise Cooke, Jonathan Seaton, I.-Hua Hung
{"title":"The Impact of Pluralistic Ignorance on Knowledge-Sharing Behaviour in Virtual Teams","authors":"Hao-Fan Chumg, Wen-Chin Tsao, Louise Cooke, Jonathan Seaton, I.-Hua Hung","doi":"10.1007/s10796-025-10601-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since Taiwan's economy is dominated by small and medium-sized enterprises, the formation of virtual teams is even more important for Taiwanese companies due to the impact of COVID- 19. Hence, this study draws on the virtual team climate and the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). However, it also adds pluralistic ignorance (which stems from social cognitive bias arising from universal behavioural adherence to social norms) as a key inhibitor to explore factors affecting the quantity and quality of knowledge-sharing behaviour through knowledge management systems (KMS) in virtual teams. A field survey of 528 employees from 72 companies in Taiwan and working in virtual teams was analysed utilising partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate the outcomes empirically. The findings show that the virtual team climate, perceived behavioural control, and subjective norm still positively affect knowledge-sharing behaviour. However, more surprisingly, the moderating effect of pluralistic ignorance dampens the positive relationships between (1) the intention to share knowledge and knowledge-sharing behaviour and (2) the virtual team climate and knowledge-sharing behaviour within virtual teams. Finally, in addition to the practical implications for managers of knowledge-intensive companies who are keen to adopt virtual teams, this study provides several theoretical and managerial implications for relevant managers and academic researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13610,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Frontiers","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10601-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since Taiwan's economy is dominated by small and medium-sized enterprises, the formation of virtual teams is even more important for Taiwanese companies due to the impact of COVID- 19. Hence, this study draws on the virtual team climate and the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). However, it also adds pluralistic ignorance (which stems from social cognitive bias arising from universal behavioural adherence to social norms) as a key inhibitor to explore factors affecting the quantity and quality of knowledge-sharing behaviour through knowledge management systems (KMS) in virtual teams. A field survey of 528 employees from 72 companies in Taiwan and working in virtual teams was analysed utilising partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate the outcomes empirically. The findings show that the virtual team climate, perceived behavioural control, and subjective norm still positively affect knowledge-sharing behaviour. However, more surprisingly, the moderating effect of pluralistic ignorance dampens the positive relationships between (1) the intention to share knowledge and knowledge-sharing behaviour and (2) the virtual team climate and knowledge-sharing behaviour within virtual teams. Finally, in addition to the practical implications for managers of knowledge-intensive companies who are keen to adopt virtual teams, this study provides several theoretical and managerial implications for relevant managers and academic researchers.

多元无知对虚拟团队知识共享行为的影响
由于台湾经济以中小企业为主,因此由于新冠疫情的影响,组建虚拟团队对台湾企业来说更加重要。因此,本研究借鉴了虚拟团队氛围和计划行为理论(TPB)。然而,它也增加了多元无知(源于普遍遵守社会规范的行为所产生的社会认知偏见),作为通过虚拟团队中的知识管理系统(KMS)探索影响知识共享行为数量和质量的因素的关键阻碍。本文利用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)对台湾72家企业的528名虚拟团队员工进行实地调查,并对结果进行实证评估。研究结果表明,虚拟团队氛围、感知行为控制和主观规范对知识共享行为仍有正向影响。然而,更令人惊讶的是,多元无知的调节作用抑制了(1)共享知识的意愿和知识共享行为以及(2)虚拟团队氛围和虚拟团队内部知识共享行为之间的正相关关系。最后,本研究除了对热衷于采用虚拟团队的知识密集型企业管理者具有实践意义外,还为相关管理者和学术研究者提供了若干理论和管理启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Systems Frontiers
Information Systems Frontiers 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
18.60%
发文量
127
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary interfaces of Information Systems (IS) are fast emerging as defining areas of research and development in IS. These developments are largely due to the transformation of Information Technology (IT) towards networked worlds and its effects on global communications and economies. While these developments are shaping the way information is used in all forms of human enterprise, they are also setting the tone and pace of information systems of the future. The major advances in IT such as client/server systems, the Internet and the desktop/multimedia computing revolution, for example, have led to numerous important vistas of research and development with considerable practical impact and academic significance. While the industry seeks to develop high performance IS/IT solutions to a variety of contemporary information support needs, academia looks to extend the reach of IS technology into new application domains. Information Systems Frontiers (ISF) aims to provide a common forum of dissemination of frontline industrial developments of substantial academic value and pioneering academic research of significant practical impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信