Avisha Das, Ish A. Talati, Juan Manuel Zambrano Chaves, Daniel Rubin, Imon Banerjee
{"title":"Weakly supervised language models for automated extraction of critical findings from radiology reports","authors":"Avisha Das, Ish A. Talati, Juan Manuel Zambrano Chaves, Daniel Rubin, Imon Banerjee","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01522-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Critical findings in radiology reports are life threatening conditions that need to be communicated promptly to physicians for timely management of patients. Although challenging, advancements in natural language processing (NLP), particularly large language models (LLMs), now enable the automated identification of key findings from verbose reports. Given the scarcity of labeled critical findings data, we implemented a two-phase, weakly supervised fine-tuning approach on 15,000 unlabeled Mayo Clinic reports. This fine-tuned model then automatically extracted critical terms on internal (Mayo Clinic, <i>n</i> = 80) and external (MIMIC-III, <i>n</i> = 123) test datasets, validated against expert annotations. Model performance was further assessed on 5000 MIMIC-IV reports using LLM-aided metrics, G-eval and Prometheus. Both manual and LLM-based evaluations showed improved task alignment with weak supervision. The pipeline and model, publicly available under an academic license, can aid in critical finding extraction for research and clinical use (https://github.com/dasavisha/CriticalFindings_Extract).</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01522-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Critical findings in radiology reports are life threatening conditions that need to be communicated promptly to physicians for timely management of patients. Although challenging, advancements in natural language processing (NLP), particularly large language models (LLMs), now enable the automated identification of key findings from verbose reports. Given the scarcity of labeled critical findings data, we implemented a two-phase, weakly supervised fine-tuning approach on 15,000 unlabeled Mayo Clinic reports. This fine-tuned model then automatically extracted critical terms on internal (Mayo Clinic, n = 80) and external (MIMIC-III, n = 123) test datasets, validated against expert annotations. Model performance was further assessed on 5000 MIMIC-IV reports using LLM-aided metrics, G-eval and Prometheus. Both manual and LLM-based evaluations showed improved task alignment with weak supervision. The pipeline and model, publicly available under an academic license, can aid in critical finding extraction for research and clinical use (https://github.com/dasavisha/CriticalFindings_Extract).
放射学报告中的关键发现是危及生命的情况,需要及时与医生沟通,以便及时对患者进行管理。尽管具有挑战性,但自然语言处理(NLP)的进步,特别是大型语言模型(llm),现在可以从冗长的报告中自动识别关键发现。鉴于标记的关键发现数据的稀缺,我们对15,000份未标记的梅奥诊所报告实施了两阶段、弱监督的微调方法。然后,这个经过微调的模型在内部(Mayo Clinic, n = 80)和外部(MIMIC-III, n = 123)测试数据集上自动提取关键术语,并根据专家注释进行验证。使用llm辅助指标、G-eval和Prometheus对5000份MIMIC-IV报告进一步评估模型性能。手工和基于llm的评估都显示了在弱监督下改进的任务一致性。该管道和模型在学术许可下公开可用,可以帮助研究和临床使用的关键发现提取(https://github.com/dasavisha/CriticalFindings_Extract)。
期刊介绍:
npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics.
The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.