Unmarried Americans vote more Democratic than their married counterparts: The role of race and religiosity in the marital gap (a research brief )

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Karyn Vilbig, Paula England, Michael Hout
{"title":"Unmarried Americans vote more Democratic than their married counterparts: The role of race and religiosity in the marital gap (a research brief )","authors":"Karyn Vilbig,&nbsp;Paula England,&nbsp;Michael Hout","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We investigate how differences in the characteristics of married and unmarried (never-married and divorced) voters contribute to a marital gap—unmarried voters are more likely to vote for Democratic presidential candidates. We also explore why the marital gap has grown over the past 40 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Research in the 1980s discovered that unmarried Americans are more likely to choose Democratic presidential candidates. We show that these gaps have persisted, and the gap between married and never-married voters has grown.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a decomposition of levels examining never-married/married and divorced/married gaps, combining data from the 1985–2022 General Social Surveys. Because the gap between married and never-married voters increased substantially between the 1984 and 2020 elections, we also performed a decomposition of change on the never-married/married gap.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The largest factor contributing to gaps between married and unmarried voters is their different racial compositions. Unmarried voters are disproportionately Black, and Black voters overwhelmingly support Democrats. Among non-Black voters, differences in religiosity contribute to marital gaps because less religious voters are more likely to be unmarried and to vote Democratic. The gap between married and never-married voters has increased since the 1980s in part because never-married voters became more diverse (with a smaller percent White) at a faster rate than married voters.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Since the 1980s, gaps by marital status in whether voters choose Democrats have become an enduring feature of American politics. These gaps are influenced by racial and religious differences in who enters into and remains in marriage.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 3","pages":"1304-1320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13058","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13058","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We investigate how differences in the characteristics of married and unmarried (never-married and divorced) voters contribute to a marital gap—unmarried voters are more likely to vote for Democratic presidential candidates. We also explore why the marital gap has grown over the past 40 years.

Background

Research in the 1980s discovered that unmarried Americans are more likely to choose Democratic presidential candidates. We show that these gaps have persisted, and the gap between married and never-married voters has grown.

Methods

We performed a decomposition of levels examining never-married/married and divorced/married gaps, combining data from the 1985–2022 General Social Surveys. Because the gap between married and never-married voters increased substantially between the 1984 and 2020 elections, we also performed a decomposition of change on the never-married/married gap.

Results

The largest factor contributing to gaps between married and unmarried voters is their different racial compositions. Unmarried voters are disproportionately Black, and Black voters overwhelmingly support Democrats. Among non-Black voters, differences in religiosity contribute to marital gaps because less religious voters are more likely to be unmarried and to vote Democratic. The gap between married and never-married voters has increased since the 1980s in part because never-married voters became more diverse (with a smaller percent White) at a faster rate than married voters.

Conclusion

Since the 1980s, gaps by marital status in whether voters choose Democrats have become an enduring feature of American politics. These gaps are influenced by racial and religious differences in who enters into and remains in marriage.

Abstract Image

未婚美国人比已婚美国人更倾向民主党:种族和宗教信仰在婚姻差距中的作用(一项研究简报)
目的:我们调查已婚和未婚(未婚和离婚)选民的特征差异如何导致婚姻差距——未婚选民更有可能投票给民主党总统候选人。我们还探讨了为什么婚姻差距在过去40年里不断扩大。20世纪80年代的研究发现,未婚的美国人更有可能选择民主党总统候选人。我们的研究表明,这些差距一直存在,已婚和未婚选民之间的差距也在扩大。我们结合1985-2022年综合社会调查的数据,对未婚/已婚和离婚/已婚的差距进行了分解。因为在1984年到2020年的选举中,已婚和未婚选民之间的差距大幅扩大,我们也对未婚和已婚选民之间的差距进行了分解。结果造成已婚和未婚选民差异的最大因素是其不同的种族构成。未婚选民主要是黑人,而黑人选民绝大多数支持民主党。在非黑人选民中,宗教信仰的差异导致了婚姻差距,因为宗教信仰较少的选民更有可能未婚并投票给民主党。自20世纪80年代以来,已婚和未婚选民之间的差距一直在扩大,部分原因是未婚选民比已婚选民以更快的速度变得更加多样化(白人所占比例较小)。自20世纪80年代以来,选民是否选择民主党的婚姻状况差异已成为美国政治的一个持久特征。这些差距受到种族和宗教差异的影响,在谁进入婚姻和保持婚姻方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信