Long-term of epicardial radiofrequency ablation and benefit for recurrent ventricular arrhythmia in Brugada syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Arga Setyo Adji, Atiyatum Billah, Juliardi Eka Putra Sit, Bryan Gervais de Liyis, Angga Nugraha, Angela Puspita, Abdillah Maulana Satrioaji, Ragil Nur Rosyadi
{"title":"Long-term of epicardial radiofrequency ablation and benefit for recurrent ventricular arrhythmia in Brugada syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Arga Setyo Adji,&nbsp;Atiyatum Billah,&nbsp;Juliardi Eka Putra Sit,&nbsp;Bryan Gervais de Liyis,&nbsp;Angga Nugraha,&nbsp;Angela Puspita,&nbsp;Abdillah Maulana Satrioaji,&nbsp;Ragil Nur Rosyadi","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a rare cardiac channelopathy linked to an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), particularly epicardial ablation, is recommended for BrS patients with recurrent VA unresponsive to conventional treatments like implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) and quinidine. This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy of epicardial RFA in preventing VA recurrence in BrS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies on RFA for VA in BrS were included. Primary outcomes were VA recurrence and all-cause mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Epicardial, endocardial, and combined ablation strategies effectively reduced VA recurrence, decreased ICD shocks, and improved clinical outcomes in BrS. Epicardial ablation RFA near coronary arteries showed a notable reduction in VA recurrence, while endocardial ablation remained a viable alternative. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in VA recurrence (RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.07–0.43; <i>p</i> &lt; .0001) and ICD shocks (RR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04–0.44; <i>p</i> = .001). Subgroup analysis suggested greater VA reduction with epicardial ablation, though without statistical significance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Epicardial RFA is associated with a significant reduction in recurrent VAs (83%) and ICD shock rates (87%) in patients with BrS. The procedure demonstrates a favorable long-term safety profile, with no mortality reported in the included studies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a rare cardiac channelopathy linked to an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), particularly epicardial ablation, is recommended for BrS patients with recurrent VA unresponsive to conventional treatments like implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) and quinidine. This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy of epicardial RFA in preventing VA recurrence in BrS.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies on RFA for VA in BrS were included. Primary outcomes were VA recurrence and all-cause mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.

Results

Epicardial, endocardial, and combined ablation strategies effectively reduced VA recurrence, decreased ICD shocks, and improved clinical outcomes in BrS. Epicardial ablation RFA near coronary arteries showed a notable reduction in VA recurrence, while endocardial ablation remained a viable alternative. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in VA recurrence (RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.07–0.43; p < .0001) and ICD shocks (RR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04–0.44; p = .001). Subgroup analysis suggested greater VA reduction with epicardial ablation, though without statistical significance.

Conclusion

Epicardial RFA is associated with a significant reduction in recurrent VAs (83%) and ICD shock rates (87%) in patients with BrS. The procedure demonstrates a favorable long-term safety profile, with no mortality reported in the included studies.

Abstract Image

长期心外膜射频消融治疗Brugada综合征复发性室性心律失常的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析
Brugada综合征(BrS)是一种罕见的心脏通道病变,与室性心律失常(VA)和心源性猝死的风险增加有关。射频消融术(RFA),特别是心外膜消融术,被推荐用于复发性室性心律失常的BrS患者,这些患者对植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)和奎尼丁等常规治疗无反应。本研究旨在评估心外膜RFA预防BrS患者VA复发的长期疗效。方法按照PRISMA 2020指南系统检索PubMed、ScienceDirect、Cochrane Library和ProQuest数据库。纳入了RFA治疗BrS中VA的研究。主要结局是VA复发和全因死亡率。使用Review Manager 5.4进行统计分析。结果心外膜、心内膜联合消融术可有效减少房颤复发,减少ICD冲击,改善BrS的临床预后。心外膜消融在冠状动脉附近的RFA显示VA复发的显著减少,而心内膜消融仍然是一个可行的选择。荟萃分析显示VA复发率显著降低(RR 0.17;95% ci 0.07-0.43;p < .0001)和ICD冲击(RR 0.13;95% ci 0.04-0.44;p = .001)。亚组分析显示心外膜消融术更能降低VA,但无统计学意义。结论心外膜RFA与BrS患者复发性VAs(83%)和ICD休克率(87%)显著降低相关。该手术具有良好的长期安全性,纳入的研究中无死亡报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信