A typology of US parents' mental loads: Core and episodic cognitive labor

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Ana Catalano Weeks, Leah Ruppanner
{"title":"A typology of US parents' mental loads: Core and episodic cognitive labor","authors":"Ana Catalano Weeks,&nbsp;Leah Ruppanner","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This article examines whether domestic cognitive labor functions like other forms of domestic labor as a means to “do gender.”</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Domestic cognitive labor is increasingly conceptualized as the invisible thinking work associated with childcare and housework. A critical question for this growing literature is the gender distribution of cognitive labor tasks: do women do it all, or does domestic cognitive labor follow similar patterns to other forms of domestic physical labor (e.g., childcare and housework), cleaving by separate spheres of activity? In this regard, is domestic cognitive labor another way parents “do gender” at home?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Applying unique survey data from a sample of US parents (<i>N</i> = 3000), we assess a 21-item battery measuring different domestic cognitive labor tasks. We first apply exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to identify whether domestic cognitive labor holds underlying constructs. Second, we estimate whether gender differences in these indices are robust in regression models net of a range of sociodemographic factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identify that domestic cognitive labor, like other forms of domestic labor, forms two distinct facets, with mothers holding the bulk of the core <i>Daily</i> tasks related to family well-being and fathers holding the <i>Episodic</i> tasks related to maintenance and finances. Further, we document that, consistent with previous housework literature, question wording structures parents' reported contributions by gender.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Ultimately, our study expands our theoretical, conceptual, and methodological understanding of domestic cognitive labor and points to the value of “doing gender” perspectives.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 3","pages":"966-989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This article examines whether domestic cognitive labor functions like other forms of domestic labor as a means to “do gender.”

Background

Domestic cognitive labor is increasingly conceptualized as the invisible thinking work associated with childcare and housework. A critical question for this growing literature is the gender distribution of cognitive labor tasks: do women do it all, or does domestic cognitive labor follow similar patterns to other forms of domestic physical labor (e.g., childcare and housework), cleaving by separate spheres of activity? In this regard, is domestic cognitive labor another way parents “do gender” at home?

Methods

Applying unique survey data from a sample of US parents (N = 3000), we assess a 21-item battery measuring different domestic cognitive labor tasks. We first apply exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to identify whether domestic cognitive labor holds underlying constructs. Second, we estimate whether gender differences in these indices are robust in regression models net of a range of sociodemographic factors.

Results

We identify that domestic cognitive labor, like other forms of domestic labor, forms two distinct facets, with mothers holding the bulk of the core Daily tasks related to family well-being and fathers holding the Episodic tasks related to maintenance and finances. Further, we document that, consistent with previous housework literature, question wording structures parents' reported contributions by gender.

Conclusion

Ultimately, our study expands our theoretical, conceptual, and methodological understanding of domestic cognitive labor and points to the value of “doing gender” perspectives.

Abstract Image

美国父母心理负荷的一种类型:核心和情景认知劳动
目的探讨家庭认知劳动是否像其他形式的家庭劳动一样,作为一种“做性别”的手段。家庭认知劳动越来越被定义为与育儿和家务有关的无形的思维工作。对于这些不断增长的文献来说,一个关键问题是认知劳动任务的性别分布:是女性包揽一切,还是家庭认知劳动遵循与其他形式的家庭体力劳动(例如,照顾孩子和家务)类似的模式,被不同的活动领域所分割?在这方面,家庭认知劳动是父母在家“做性别”的另一种方式吗?方法采用来自美国父母(N = 3000)的独特调查数据,我们评估了21项测量不同家庭认知劳动任务的电池。我们首先运用探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析来确定国内认知劳动是否具有潜在的构念。其次,我们估计这些指数的性别差异是否在一系列社会人口因素的回归模型中是稳健的。我们发现,家庭认知劳动和其他形式的家庭劳动一样,形成了两个不同的方面,母亲承担着与家庭幸福相关的大部分核心日常任务,父亲则承担着与维护和财务相关的偶发性任务。此外,我们证明,与之前的家务文献一致,问题措辞结构父母报告的性别贡献。最后,我们的研究扩展了我们对家庭认知劳动的理论、概念和方法论的理解,并指出了“做性别”视角的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信