Unpacking power dynamics and women's economic empowerment in polygynous households in Burkina Faso

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Sarah Eissler, Jessica Heckert, Abdoulaye Pedehombga, Armande Sanou, Rasmané Ganaba, Aulo Gelli
{"title":"Unpacking power dynamics and women's economic empowerment in polygynous households in Burkina Faso","authors":"Sarah Eissler,&nbsp;Jessica Heckert,&nbsp;Abdoulaye Pedehombga,&nbsp;Armande Sanou,&nbsp;Rasmané Ganaba,&nbsp;Aulo Gelli","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We aim to describe power distributions in polygynous households and consider how these matter for the production and allocation of food-generating resources in western Burkina Faso, where there is a high prevalence of polygyny.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Recent studies on polygyny focus on its likely negative consequences and mechanisms for explaining these outcomes using data from large multitopic surveys. These approaches fail to consider the underlying dynamics in polygynous households.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>As part of a 5-year mixed-methods evaluation of a nutrition- and gender-sensitive poultry value chain intervention in western Burkina Faso, we conducted a thematic analysis of 24 gender-disaggregated focus group discussions (265 individuals) and 24 semi-structured interviews in six communities. They focused on gender and power dynamics, food production, and food allocation with a specific focus on polygyny.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Relationships among co-wives are often cooperative, though not necessarily warm, and typically hierarchical. Monogamous and polygynous marriage may support women's empowerment in different domains. Polygynous co-wives may be able to divide care work, but first wives often control how labor is divided. In monogamous marriages, wives often make decisions jointly with their husbands, while in polygynous marriages, most co-wives are left out of decisions. In polygynous households, women are better able to maintain control over their earnings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We discuss these findings in terms of their implications for studying polygynous households in quantitative surveys and in terms of how to better design and target interventions for this population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 3","pages":"1249-1268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13063","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We aim to describe power distributions in polygynous households and consider how these matter for the production and allocation of food-generating resources in western Burkina Faso, where there is a high prevalence of polygyny.

Background

Recent studies on polygyny focus on its likely negative consequences and mechanisms for explaining these outcomes using data from large multitopic surveys. These approaches fail to consider the underlying dynamics in polygynous households.

Method

As part of a 5-year mixed-methods evaluation of a nutrition- and gender-sensitive poultry value chain intervention in western Burkina Faso, we conducted a thematic analysis of 24 gender-disaggregated focus group discussions (265 individuals) and 24 semi-structured interviews in six communities. They focused on gender and power dynamics, food production, and food allocation with a specific focus on polygyny.

Results

Relationships among co-wives are often cooperative, though not necessarily warm, and typically hierarchical. Monogamous and polygynous marriage may support women's empowerment in different domains. Polygynous co-wives may be able to divide care work, but first wives often control how labor is divided. In monogamous marriages, wives often make decisions jointly with their husbands, while in polygynous marriages, most co-wives are left out of decisions. In polygynous households, women are better able to maintain control over their earnings.

Conclusion

We discuss these findings in terms of their implications for studying polygynous households in quantitative surveys and in terms of how to better design and target interventions for this population.

剖析布基纳法索一夫多妻制家庭中的权力动态和妇女经济赋权
我们的目标是描述一夫多妻制家庭中的权力分配,并考虑这些对布基纳法索西部一夫多妻制盛行的粮食生产资源的生产和分配有何影响。最近对一夫多妻制的研究主要集中在其可能的负面后果和解释这些结果的机制上,这些研究使用了来自大型多主题调查的数据。这些方法没有考虑到一夫多妻制家庭的潜在动力。方法作为对布基纳法索西部营养和性别敏感家禽价值链干预的5年混合方法评估的一部分,我们对6个社区的24个按性别分类的焦点小组讨论(265人)和24个半结构化访谈进行了专题分析。他们关注性别和权力动态、粮食生产和粮食分配,特别关注一夫多妻制。共同妻子之间的关系通常是合作的,尽管不一定是温暖的,而且通常是等级分明的。一夫一妻制和一夫多妻制婚姻可能在不同领域支持妇女赋权。一夫多妻制的共同妻子可能会分担照顾孩子的工作,但第一任妻子通常会控制如何分配工作。在一夫一妻制的婚姻中,妻子通常与丈夫共同做决定,而在一夫多妻制的婚姻中,大多数共同妻子被排除在决定之外。在一夫多妻制家庭中,女性能够更好地控制自己的收入。我们讨论了这些发现对在定量调查中研究一夫多妻家庭的意义,以及如何更好地设计和针对这一人群的目标干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信