The effects of a health literacy promotion program for prevention of preterm birth among pregnant women who received antenatal care services in the hospital-based
{"title":"The effects of a health literacy promotion program for prevention of preterm birth among pregnant women who received antenatal care services in the hospital-based","authors":"Narisa Timsin , Supichaya Wangpitipanit","doi":"10.1016/j.wcn.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Premature birth, defined as delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, is a critical global health issue that poses significant risks to maternal and neonatal well-being. Although substantial research has been conducted on interventions to prevent preterm births in high-income countries, evidence on culturally adapted strategies tailored for pregnant women in low- and middle-income settings, such as Thailand, remains limited. This study addresses this gap by evaluating a culturally tailored health literacy promotion program developed using Nutbeam's health literacy model to enhance health literacy and risk perception among Thai pregnant women.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest study was conducted from March to September 2024 at health promotion hospitals in Thailand. Thirty-one pregnant women receiving prenatal care were recruited through convenience sampling. The intervention was a 12-week health literacy program based on Nutbeam's health literacy model and prenatal care standards, emphasizing cognitive, behavioral, and motivational aspects of health literacy. The program included a care booklet, risk screening manual, assessment stickers, and educational materials. Weekly interactive \"4-Checks\" sessions (20–45 min) and personalized counseling every four weeks were central components. Health literacy and risk perception were assessed using validated questionnaires with a content validity index of 0.90 and high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85, health literacy; 0.87, risk perception). Measurements were taken before and after the program to assess baseline levels and immediate effects of the intervention. Statistical analyses, including Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 29.0.2.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age of participants was 30.23 years (SD = 5.26), with 51.6% in their second or subsequent pregnancies. Key information sources included hospital staff, healthcare providers, relatives, and social media. The program significantly improved health literacy scores (0–64 to 40–80; <em>Z</em> = −4.01, <em>P</em> < 0.001) and risk perception scores (10–50 to 33–50; <em>Z</em> = −3.54, <em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The health literacy program effectively enhanced health literacy and risk perception among Thai pregnant women, providing a viable framework for reducing premature birth risks. Future research should incorporate control groups and longitudinal assessments to evaluate sustained effects and long-term program impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101283,"journal":{"name":"Women and Children Nursing","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Children Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949751525000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Premature birth, defined as delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, is a critical global health issue that poses significant risks to maternal and neonatal well-being. Although substantial research has been conducted on interventions to prevent preterm births in high-income countries, evidence on culturally adapted strategies tailored for pregnant women in low- and middle-income settings, such as Thailand, remains limited. This study addresses this gap by evaluating a culturally tailored health literacy promotion program developed using Nutbeam's health literacy model to enhance health literacy and risk perception among Thai pregnant women.
Methods
A quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest study was conducted from March to September 2024 at health promotion hospitals in Thailand. Thirty-one pregnant women receiving prenatal care were recruited through convenience sampling. The intervention was a 12-week health literacy program based on Nutbeam's health literacy model and prenatal care standards, emphasizing cognitive, behavioral, and motivational aspects of health literacy. The program included a care booklet, risk screening manual, assessment stickers, and educational materials. Weekly interactive "4-Checks" sessions (20–45 min) and personalized counseling every four weeks were central components. Health literacy and risk perception were assessed using validated questionnaires with a content validity index of 0.90 and high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85, health literacy; 0.87, risk perception). Measurements were taken before and after the program to assess baseline levels and immediate effects of the intervention. Statistical analyses, including Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 29.0.2.0.
Results
The mean age of participants was 30.23 years (SD = 5.26), with 51.6% in their second or subsequent pregnancies. Key information sources included hospital staff, healthcare providers, relatives, and social media. The program significantly improved health literacy scores (0–64 to 40–80; Z = −4.01, P < 0.001) and risk perception scores (10–50 to 33–50; Z = −3.54, P < 0.001).
Conclusion
The health literacy program effectively enhanced health literacy and risk perception among Thai pregnant women, providing a viable framework for reducing premature birth risks. Future research should incorporate control groups and longitudinal assessments to evaluate sustained effects and long-term program impacts.