Florence Leony , Chen-ju Lin , Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
{"title":"Multimodal fusion architectures for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis: An experimental study","authors":"Florence Leony , Chen-ju Lin , Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>In the attempt of early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease, varying forms of medical records of multiple modalities are gathered to seize the interaction of multiple factors. However, the heterogeneity of multimodal data brings a challenge. Hence, the role of artificial intelligence comes into play to provide the medical practitioner assistance in making diagnosis and prognosis. In order to be adopted as a clinical decision support system, interpretable or explainable model is important for healthcare professionals to trust the results. This study assessed various popular machine learning models under two multimodal fusion architectures to find the best combination in terms of both predictive performance and interpretability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Two architectures, early and late, also known as feature- and decision-level fusion were chosen for multinomial classification task. On top of the commonly used simple concatenation, this study employed weighted and hybrid weighted concatenation to fuse features within and across modalities under the two fusion structures. To test the efficacy of each model pipeline, the assessment was done according to their distinct foundations on which the models were built and each of their advantages was recognized. Classification metrics were unified and visualized into a pentagon to compare the overall performance of each pipeline. In addition, interpretability analysis was provided to quantify the importance of each modality and feature recognized by each model.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The potential characteristics of each type of pipelines in terms of prediction accuracy and ability to capture the relevant markers of each cognitive state were uncovered. In this particular healthcare application, the tree-based and linear models were the top 2 choices. Coupled with early and late fusion structure with weighted concatenation, reaching the balanced accuracy of 0.920 and 0.912, consecutively. The top 5 most important features revealed belong to Cognitive Test Scores and Neuropsychological Battery of Test modalities.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>This work contributes as medical applications of artificial intelligence evaluation to aid practitioners in understanding the capability of different fusion architectures with different classifiers in getting to know the use of machine learning in clinical setting. With accurate classification, early detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease can be achieved.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104834"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425000632","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective:
In the attempt of early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease, varying forms of medical records of multiple modalities are gathered to seize the interaction of multiple factors. However, the heterogeneity of multimodal data brings a challenge. Hence, the role of artificial intelligence comes into play to provide the medical practitioner assistance in making diagnosis and prognosis. In order to be adopted as a clinical decision support system, interpretable or explainable model is important for healthcare professionals to trust the results. This study assessed various popular machine learning models under two multimodal fusion architectures to find the best combination in terms of both predictive performance and interpretability.
Methods:
Two architectures, early and late, also known as feature- and decision-level fusion were chosen for multinomial classification task. On top of the commonly used simple concatenation, this study employed weighted and hybrid weighted concatenation to fuse features within and across modalities under the two fusion structures. To test the efficacy of each model pipeline, the assessment was done according to their distinct foundations on which the models were built and each of their advantages was recognized. Classification metrics were unified and visualized into a pentagon to compare the overall performance of each pipeline. In addition, interpretability analysis was provided to quantify the importance of each modality and feature recognized by each model.
Results:
The potential characteristics of each type of pipelines in terms of prediction accuracy and ability to capture the relevant markers of each cognitive state were uncovered. In this particular healthcare application, the tree-based and linear models were the top 2 choices. Coupled with early and late fusion structure with weighted concatenation, reaching the balanced accuracy of 0.920 and 0.912, consecutively. The top 5 most important features revealed belong to Cognitive Test Scores and Neuropsychological Battery of Test modalities.
Conclusion:
This work contributes as medical applications of artificial intelligence evaluation to aid practitioners in understanding the capability of different fusion architectures with different classifiers in getting to know the use of machine learning in clinical setting. With accurate classification, early detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease can be achieved.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.