Finite Element Analysis of Knee Implant Materials Under Cyclic Loading Condition: An Analysis of Failures

IF 5.6 4区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Irbm Pub Date : 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1016/j.irbm.2025.100893
Deepak Kumar, Rina Maiti
{"title":"Finite Element Analysis of Knee Implant Materials Under Cyclic Loading Condition: An Analysis of Failures","authors":"Deepak Kumar,&nbsp;Rina Maiti","doi":"10.1016/j.irbm.2025.100893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the mechanical performance of knee implant materials under cyclic loading conditions using Finite Element Methods (FEM). The analysis focuses on three commonly used femoral and tibial component materials: Co-Cr-Mo alloy, Stainless Steel (ISO 5832-1), and Titanium alloy (ISO 5832-2). A plastic cushion of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) is used consistently across all material combinations. The goal is to determine the optimal material for minimizing stress and deformation under n number (millions) of cyclic loading conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted using ABAQUS to simulate the mechanical performance of the knee implant materials under cyclic loading conditions. The applied loading conditions varied from 700 N to 3500 N, corresponding to the vertical ground reaction and gait cycle forces. The three metallic materials were analysed with UHMWPE to assess contact pressure distribution and wear of PE component after n numbers of cycles.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis showed that Co-Cr-Mo alloy exhibited the least stress 13 MPa and deformation 0.17 mm among the three materials. Paired with PE, it has the least contact pressure, 0.8 MPa, and the wear rate of PE is 0.116 mm/million cycles. Titanium alloy and Stainless Steel (ISO 5832-1) showed higher stress and deformation, indicating lower durability under cyclic loading.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings highlight Co-Cr-Mo alloy as the optimal material for knee implants, enhancing mechanical stability and longevity. This selection minimizes failure rates and revision surgeries.</div><div>Future work includes experimental validation and advanced modelling to refine computational findings and develop patient-specific implants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14605,"journal":{"name":"Irbm","volume":"46 3","pages":"Article 100893"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irbm","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1959031825000181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the mechanical performance of knee implant materials under cyclic loading conditions using Finite Element Methods (FEM). The analysis focuses on three commonly used femoral and tibial component materials: Co-Cr-Mo alloy, Stainless Steel (ISO 5832-1), and Titanium alloy (ISO 5832-2). A plastic cushion of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) is used consistently across all material combinations. The goal is to determine the optimal material for minimizing stress and deformation under n number (millions) of cyclic loading conditions.

Methods

Finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted using ABAQUS to simulate the mechanical performance of the knee implant materials under cyclic loading conditions. The applied loading conditions varied from 700 N to 3500 N, corresponding to the vertical ground reaction and gait cycle forces. The three metallic materials were analysed with UHMWPE to assess contact pressure distribution and wear of PE component after n numbers of cycles.

Results

The analysis showed that Co-Cr-Mo alloy exhibited the least stress 13 MPa and deformation 0.17 mm among the three materials. Paired with PE, it has the least contact pressure, 0.8 MPa, and the wear rate of PE is 0.116 mm/million cycles. Titanium alloy and Stainless Steel (ISO 5832-1) showed higher stress and deformation, indicating lower durability under cyclic loading.

Conclusion

These findings highlight Co-Cr-Mo alloy as the optimal material for knee implants, enhancing mechanical stability and longevity. This selection minimizes failure rates and revision surgeries.
Future work includes experimental validation and advanced modelling to refine computational findings and develop patient-specific implants.

Abstract Image

循环载荷条件下膝关节植入材料的有限元分析:失效分析
目的利用有限元法评估膝关节植入材料在循环载荷条件下的力学性能。分析的重点是三种常用的股骨和胫骨假体材料:Co-Cr-Mo合金,不锈钢(ISO 5832-1)和钛合金(ISO 5832-2)。超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)的塑料缓冲垫在所有材料组合中一致使用。目标是确定在n次(百万次)循环加载条件下使应力和变形最小的最佳材料。方法采用ABAQUS软件进行有限元分析,模拟膝关节植入材料在循环加载条件下的力学性能。施加的载荷条件从700到3500 N,对应于垂直地面反作用力和步态周期力。用超高分子量聚乙烯对三种金属材料进行了分析,评估了n次循环后PE组件的接触压力分布和磨损情况。结果三种材料中Co-Cr-Mo合金的应力最小(13 MPa),变形最小(0.17 mm)。与PE配对,接触压力最小,为0.8 MPa, PE的磨损率为0.116 mm/million cycles。钛合金和不锈钢(ISO 5832-1)表现出较高的应力和变形,表明在循环载荷下耐久性较低。结论Co-Cr-Mo合金是膝关节植入物的最佳材料,可提高机械稳定性和使用寿命。这种选择将失败率和翻修手术降至最低。未来的工作包括实验验证和先进的建模,以完善计算结果和开发患者特异性植入物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irbm
Irbm ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
81
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: IRBM is the journal of the AGBM (Alliance for engineering in Biology an Medicine / Alliance pour le génie biologique et médical) and the SFGBM (BioMedical Engineering French Society / Société française de génie biologique médical) and the AFIB (French Association of Biomedical Engineers / Association française des ingénieurs biomédicaux). As a vehicle of information and knowledge in the field of biomedical technologies, IRBM is devoted to fundamental as well as clinical research. Biomedical engineering and use of new technologies are the cornerstones of IRBM, providing authors and users with the latest information. Its six issues per year propose reviews (state-of-the-art and current knowledge), original articles directed at fundamental research and articles focusing on biomedical engineering. All articles are submitted to peer reviewers acting as guarantors for IRBM''s scientific and medical content. The field covered by IRBM includes all the discipline of Biomedical engineering. Thereby, the type of papers published include those that cover the technological and methodological development in: -Physiological and Biological Signal processing (EEG, MEG, ECG…)- Medical Image processing- Biomechanics- Biomaterials- Medical Physics- Biophysics- Physiological and Biological Sensors- Information technologies in healthcare- Disability research- Computational physiology- …
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信