Enhancing seizure detection with hybrid XGBoost and recurrent neural networks

Santushti Santosh Betgeri , Madhu Shukla , Dinesh Kumar , Surbhi B. Khan , Muhammad Attique Khan , Nora A. Alkhaldi
{"title":"Enhancing seizure detection with hybrid XGBoost and recurrent neural networks","authors":"Santushti Santosh Betgeri ,&nbsp;Madhu Shukla ,&nbsp;Dinesh Kumar ,&nbsp;Surbhi B. Khan ,&nbsp;Muhammad Attique Khan ,&nbsp;Nora A. Alkhaldi","doi":"10.1016/j.neuri.2025.100206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Epileptic seizures are sudden and unpredictable, posing serious health risks and significantly affecting the quality of life of patients. An accurate and timely prediction system can help mitigate these risks by enabling preventive measures and improving patient safety. This study investigates machine learning and deep learning algorithms for seizure prediction, comparing their effectiveness on a large EEG dataset of epileptic patients. Signal processing techniques were applied to enhance data quality, and all models were trained on the same dataset for binary classification. Sixteen models were evaluated, including traditional classifiers such as Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Trees, ensemble methods that include Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and advanced techniques such as Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machines, Gated Recurrent Units, and Long Short-Term Memory networks. Performance was assessed using multiple evaluation metrics on both training and validation datasets. While simpler models showed varied accuracy, ensemble and deep learning models performed significantly better, with hybrid approaches demonstrating strong generalization. Results show that whereas ensemble and deep learning models far exceeded simpler models, their accuracy varied. AUC of 0.995 and accuracy of 98.2% on validation data and 0.994 AUC with 96.8% accuracy on test data were obtained by the proposed hybrid Model integrating XGBoost with RNN-based architectures (LSTM and GRU). High recall (96.2%) shown by the Model guarantees minimal false negatives and is important for clinical uses. Furthermore, EEG signal preprocessing methods improved data quality, raising classification accuracy. This Model can be implemented for real-time monitoring using wearable devices, enabling continuous patient observation and remote healthcare applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74295,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience informatics","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528625000214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epileptic seizures are sudden and unpredictable, posing serious health risks and significantly affecting the quality of life of patients. An accurate and timely prediction system can help mitigate these risks by enabling preventive measures and improving patient safety. This study investigates machine learning and deep learning algorithms for seizure prediction, comparing their effectiveness on a large EEG dataset of epileptic patients. Signal processing techniques were applied to enhance data quality, and all models were trained on the same dataset for binary classification. Sixteen models were evaluated, including traditional classifiers such as Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Trees, ensemble methods that include Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and advanced techniques such as Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machines, Gated Recurrent Units, and Long Short-Term Memory networks. Performance was assessed using multiple evaluation metrics on both training and validation datasets. While simpler models showed varied accuracy, ensemble and deep learning models performed significantly better, with hybrid approaches demonstrating strong generalization. Results show that whereas ensemble and deep learning models far exceeded simpler models, their accuracy varied. AUC of 0.995 and accuracy of 98.2% on validation data and 0.994 AUC with 96.8% accuracy on test data were obtained by the proposed hybrid Model integrating XGBoost with RNN-based architectures (LSTM and GRU). High recall (96.2%) shown by the Model guarantees minimal false negatives and is important for clinical uses. Furthermore, EEG signal preprocessing methods improved data quality, raising classification accuracy. This Model can be implemented for real-time monitoring using wearable devices, enabling continuous patient observation and remote healthcare applications.
混合XGBoost和循环神经网络增强癫痫检测
癫痫发作是突然和不可预测的,造成严重的健康风险,并严重影响患者的生活质量。一个准确和及时的预测系统可以通过采取预防措施和改善患者安全来帮助减轻这些风险。本研究探讨了机器学习和深度学习算法用于癫痫发作预测,比较了它们在大型癫痫患者脑电图数据集上的有效性。采用信号处理技术提高数据质量,并在同一数据集上训练所有模型进行二值分类。评估了16种模型,包括传统的分类器,如逻辑回归、k近邻、决策树、集成方法,包括随机森林、梯度增强,以及先进的技术,如极端梯度增强、支持向量机、门控循环单元和长短期记忆网络。在训练和验证数据集上使用多个评估指标评估性能。虽然简单的模型显示出不同的准确性,但集成和深度学习模型的表现明显更好,混合方法显示出强大的泛化。结果表明,尽管集成和深度学习模型远远超过简单模型,但它们的准确性各不相同。将XGBoost与基于rnn架构(LSTM和GRU)相结合的混合模型在验证数据上的AUC为0.995,准确率为98.2%;在测试数据上的AUC为0.994,准确率为96.8%。模型显示的高召回率(96.2%)保证了最小的假阴性,这对临床应用很重要。此外,脑电信号预处理方法改善了数据质量,提高了分类精度。该模型可以通过可穿戴设备实现实时监控,实现患者的连续观察和远程医疗应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience informatics
Neuroscience informatics Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Information Systems, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Signal Processing, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Clinical Neurology, Pathology and Medical Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信