Comment on “Symmetric twin paradox for free-falling frames: Argument against the relativistic time dilation?”

IF 2.3 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Justo Pastor Lambare
{"title":"Comment on “Symmetric twin paradox for free-falling frames: Argument against the relativistic time dilation?”","authors":"Justo Pastor Lambare","doi":"10.1016/j.physleta.2025.130579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In a recent article in this journal, Václav Vavryčuk and Michal Křížek have argued the Lorentz transformation does not predict time dilation, therefore the theory of relativity must be incorrect. To prove their claim they concocted a configuration of the twin paradox where no age difference is involved between the siblings. We explain the problems with their argumentation that make their conclusions untenable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20172,"journal":{"name":"Physics Letters A","volume":"550 ","pages":"Article 130579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics Letters A","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960125003597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a recent article in this journal, Václav Vavryčuk and Michal Křížek have argued the Lorentz transformation does not predict time dilation, therefore the theory of relativity must be incorrect. To prove their claim they concocted a configuration of the twin paradox where no age difference is involved between the siblings. We explain the problems with their argumentation that make their conclusions untenable.
评论“自由落体坐标系的对称孪生悖论:反对相对论性时间膨胀的论证?”
在该杂志最近的一篇文章中,Václav vavry uk和Michal Křížek认为洛伦兹变换不能预测时间膨胀,因此相对论一定是不正确的。为了证明他们的说法,他们编造了一个双胞胎悖论的配置,其中兄弟姐妹之间没有年龄差异。我们用他们的论证来解释使他们的结论站不住脚的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics Letters A
Physics Letters A 物理-物理:综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
493
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Physics Letters A offers an exciting publication outlet for novel and frontier physics. It encourages the submission of new research on: condensed matter physics, theoretical physics, nonlinear science, statistical physics, mathematical and computational physics, general and cross-disciplinary physics (including foundations), atomic, molecular and cluster physics, plasma and fluid physics, optical physics, biological physics and nanoscience. No articles on High Energy and Nuclear Physics are published in Physics Letters A. The journal''s high standard and wide dissemination ensures a broad readership amongst the physics community. Rapid publication times and flexible length restrictions give Physics Letters A the edge over other journals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信