Christine M. Crincoli , Jennifer L.G. van de Ligt , Alex K. Eapen , Anthony T. Pavel , Paul R. Hanlon , Kelly Almond-Abbate , Esther Haugabrooks , Jason Hlywka , Vivian Lu , Fleur de Mooij , Margaret Pandis , Ross Peterson , Jay S. Petrick , Padhma Ranganathan , Rayetta G. Henderson
{"title":"A tool to support food substance safety evaluations in the United States","authors":"Christine M. Crincoli , Jennifer L.G. van de Ligt , Alex K. Eapen , Anthony T. Pavel , Paul R. Hanlon , Kelly Almond-Abbate , Esther Haugabrooks , Jason Hlywka , Vivian Lu , Fleur de Mooij , Margaret Pandis , Ross Peterson , Jay S. Petrick , Padhma Ranganathan , Rayetta G. Henderson","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published numerous regulations and guidance documents providing the foundation for establishing the safety of food substances. However, subject matter expertise is needed to interpret regulations and guidance documents commissioned to meet the regulatory standard of reasonable certainty that the substance is not harmful under the conditions of its intended use. To provide guidance for decision-making and communication within the food industry on safety determinations for food substances, a decision tree was developed to inform the user on what approach, supporting information, and documentation are needed. This framework has been developed by industry experts based on considerable experience substantiating safety with a wide range of food substances, to provide a structured approach to help navigate changes that have the potential to impact safety determinations. Several case studies applying the decision tree are presented. The objective of this manuscript is to serve as a reference to promote aligned practices using a decision tree for evaluating food substance safety throughout the food industry, as well as to function as a communication tool between food manufacturers, internal stakeholders, and consumers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 105838"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025000686","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published numerous regulations and guidance documents providing the foundation for establishing the safety of food substances. However, subject matter expertise is needed to interpret regulations and guidance documents commissioned to meet the regulatory standard of reasonable certainty that the substance is not harmful under the conditions of its intended use. To provide guidance for decision-making and communication within the food industry on safety determinations for food substances, a decision tree was developed to inform the user on what approach, supporting information, and documentation are needed. This framework has been developed by industry experts based on considerable experience substantiating safety with a wide range of food substances, to provide a structured approach to help navigate changes that have the potential to impact safety determinations. Several case studies applying the decision tree are presented. The objective of this manuscript is to serve as a reference to promote aligned practices using a decision tree for evaluating food substance safety throughout the food industry, as well as to function as a communication tool between food manufacturers, internal stakeholders, and consumers.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)