Mare M.H. Walraven , Pieta Krijnen , David A. Vuijk , Monique Reijnierse , Inger B. Schipper , Marco F. Termaat
{"title":"The additional value of radiology reports in the follow-up of extremity fractures: a retrospective study in an academic hospital","authors":"Mare M.H. Walraven , Pieta Krijnen , David A. Vuijk , Monique Reijnierse , Inger B. Schipper , Marco F. Termaat","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Radiology reports on radiographic findings during follow-up (FU) after extremity fractures are generally not yet available when the patient is seen by the treating orthopedic trauma surgeon and may therefore be redundant. The aim of this study was to explore the inter-observer agreement on the reported findings of the FU radiograph between orthopedic trauma surgeons and radiologists.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included all FU radiographs of adult patients with an extremity fracture, treated in a Dutch university hospital between January 2022 and July 2023. The radiologist's and orthopedic trauma surgeon's assessments of unacceptable alignment, delayed/non-union and abnormalities associated with osteosynthesis material (OSM) on the FU radiographs were collected from the medical files. Fracture healing was considered normal in the absence of these findings. The interobserver agreement of the radiographic parameters between surgeon and radiologist was determined using Cohens' Kappa (κ). Additionally, incidental findings and their clinical relevance were explored.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>953 FU radiographs of 569 patients were included. The interobserver agreement was close to perfect for normal fracture healing (κ = 0.82, 95 % CI 0.77–0.88) and delayed/non-union (κ = 0.94, 95 % CI 0.89–0.99). The inter-observer agreement was substantial for unacceptable alignment of the fracture (κ = 0.80, 95 % CI 0.72–0.88) and abnormalities associated with the OSM (κ = 0.77, 95 % CI 0.65–0.89). Twenty-one incidental findings were diagnosed in the FU by the radiologist of which two were also independently described by the surgeon. Three of the findings that were missed or not described by the surgeon could have clinical significance, however the missing of these findings did not lead complications or additional hospital visits. These included two missed rib fractures and one osteochondral defect, which led to prolonged immobilization due to pain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Radiographic reports in the FU of extremity fractures have limited additional value for clinical care and probably lacks cost-effectiveness or efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 103043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225001419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Radiology reports on radiographic findings during follow-up (FU) after extremity fractures are generally not yet available when the patient is seen by the treating orthopedic trauma surgeon and may therefore be redundant. The aim of this study was to explore the inter-observer agreement on the reported findings of the FU radiograph between orthopedic trauma surgeons and radiologists.
Method
This retrospective cohort study included all FU radiographs of adult patients with an extremity fracture, treated in a Dutch university hospital between January 2022 and July 2023. The radiologist's and orthopedic trauma surgeon's assessments of unacceptable alignment, delayed/non-union and abnormalities associated with osteosynthesis material (OSM) on the FU radiographs were collected from the medical files. Fracture healing was considered normal in the absence of these findings. The interobserver agreement of the radiographic parameters between surgeon and radiologist was determined using Cohens' Kappa (κ). Additionally, incidental findings and their clinical relevance were explored.
Results
953 FU radiographs of 569 patients were included. The interobserver agreement was close to perfect for normal fracture healing (κ = 0.82, 95 % CI 0.77–0.88) and delayed/non-union (κ = 0.94, 95 % CI 0.89–0.99). The inter-observer agreement was substantial for unacceptable alignment of the fracture (κ = 0.80, 95 % CI 0.72–0.88) and abnormalities associated with the OSM (κ = 0.77, 95 % CI 0.65–0.89). Twenty-one incidental findings were diagnosed in the FU by the radiologist of which two were also independently described by the surgeon. Three of the findings that were missed or not described by the surgeon could have clinical significance, however the missing of these findings did not lead complications or additional hospital visits. These included two missed rib fractures and one osteochondral defect, which led to prolonged immobilization due to pain.
Conclusion
Radiographic reports in the FU of extremity fractures have limited additional value for clinical care and probably lacks cost-effectiveness or efficiency.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.