{"title":"Advancing Holistic Decision-Making Systems in Schools: Insights From Academic Research and Practical Applications","authors":"Abhinava Barthakur, Rebecca Marrone, Shadi Esnaashari, Vitomir Kovanovic, Shane Dawson","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There is growing recognition in the education sector of the critical role empirical data plays in aiding strategic decision-making and supporting personalised learning. The call for increased and more nuanced data-driven decision-making has been primarily addressed by the institutional use of student learning dashboards and learner profiles in higher education; their application and evaluation in K-12 settings remain underexplored. Existing approaches often lack robust empirical evidence, and there is limited research addressing their use in real-world classroom environments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to bridge the knowledge gap by systematically reviewing both academic and non-peer-reviewed literature on decision-making systems in schools. The review focused on understanding the types of data used, the implementation status of dashboards and learner profiles, and the practical applications in K-2 education. The analysis included 19 academic papers as well as 10 pieces of non-peer-reviewed literature to examine the landscape of decision-making systems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The analysis revealed that while academic literature highlights the underuse of diverse data types and a scarcity of real-world evaluations, non-peer-reviewed literature showcases promising holistic decision-making approaches employed by schools and government bodies globally. However, these practical applications often lack empirical validation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides a novel contribution by exploring how researchers can move beyond stand-alone studies focusing on academic performance to gauge the success of different decision-making systems. The study also recommends that practitioners invest in more research-backed systems to create better teaching and learning practices and enhance personalised learning. By highlighting the current gaps and offering forward-looking recommendations, our study clarifies the present landscape and serves as a foundation for future research to improve student learning outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
There is growing recognition in the education sector of the critical role empirical data plays in aiding strategic decision-making and supporting personalised learning. The call for increased and more nuanced data-driven decision-making has been primarily addressed by the institutional use of student learning dashboards and learner profiles in higher education; their application and evaluation in K-12 settings remain underexplored. Existing approaches often lack robust empirical evidence, and there is limited research addressing their use in real-world classroom environments.
Objectives and Methods
This study aims to bridge the knowledge gap by systematically reviewing both academic and non-peer-reviewed literature on decision-making systems in schools. The review focused on understanding the types of data used, the implementation status of dashboards and learner profiles, and the practical applications in K-2 education. The analysis included 19 academic papers as well as 10 pieces of non-peer-reviewed literature to examine the landscape of decision-making systems.
Results
The analysis revealed that while academic literature highlights the underuse of diverse data types and a scarcity of real-world evaluations, non-peer-reviewed literature showcases promising holistic decision-making approaches employed by schools and government bodies globally. However, these practical applications often lack empirical validation.
Conclusions
This study provides a novel contribution by exploring how researchers can move beyond stand-alone studies focusing on academic performance to gauge the success of different decision-making systems. The study also recommends that practitioners invest in more research-backed systems to create better teaching and learning practices and enhance personalised learning. By highlighting the current gaps and offering forward-looking recommendations, our study clarifies the present landscape and serves as a foundation for future research to improve student learning outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope