Advancing Holistic Decision-Making Systems in Schools: Insights From Academic Research and Practical Applications

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Abhinava Barthakur, Rebecca Marrone, Shadi Esnaashari, Vitomir Kovanovic, Shane Dawson
{"title":"Advancing Holistic Decision-Making Systems in Schools: Insights From Academic Research and Practical Applications","authors":"Abhinava Barthakur,&nbsp;Rebecca Marrone,&nbsp;Shadi Esnaashari,&nbsp;Vitomir Kovanovic,&nbsp;Shane Dawson","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There is growing recognition in the education sector of the critical role empirical data plays in aiding strategic decision-making and supporting personalised learning. The call for increased and more nuanced data-driven decision-making has been primarily addressed by the institutional use of student learning dashboards and learner profiles in higher education; their application and evaluation in K-12 settings remain underexplored. Existing approaches often lack robust empirical evidence, and there is limited research addressing their use in real-world classroom environments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to bridge the knowledge gap by systematically reviewing both academic and non-peer-reviewed literature on decision-making systems in schools. The review focused on understanding the types of data used, the implementation status of dashboards and learner profiles, and the practical applications in K-2 education. The analysis included 19 academic papers as well as 10 pieces of non-peer-reviewed literature to examine the landscape of decision-making systems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The analysis revealed that while academic literature highlights the underuse of diverse data types and a scarcity of real-world evaluations, non-peer-reviewed literature showcases promising holistic decision-making approaches employed by schools and government bodies globally. However, these practical applications often lack empirical validation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides a novel contribution by exploring how researchers can move beyond stand-alone studies focusing on academic performance to gauge the success of different decision-making systems. The study also recommends that practitioners invest in more research-backed systems to create better teaching and learning practices and enhance personalised learning. By highlighting the current gaps and offering forward-looking recommendations, our study clarifies the present landscape and serves as a foundation for future research to improve student learning outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is growing recognition in the education sector of the critical role empirical data plays in aiding strategic decision-making and supporting personalised learning. The call for increased and more nuanced data-driven decision-making has been primarily addressed by the institutional use of student learning dashboards and learner profiles in higher education; their application and evaluation in K-12 settings remain underexplored. Existing approaches often lack robust empirical evidence, and there is limited research addressing their use in real-world classroom environments.

Objectives and Methods

This study aims to bridge the knowledge gap by systematically reviewing both academic and non-peer-reviewed literature on decision-making systems in schools. The review focused on understanding the types of data used, the implementation status of dashboards and learner profiles, and the practical applications in K-2 education. The analysis included 19 academic papers as well as 10 pieces of non-peer-reviewed literature to examine the landscape of decision-making systems.

Results

The analysis revealed that while academic literature highlights the underuse of diverse data types and a scarcity of real-world evaluations, non-peer-reviewed literature showcases promising holistic decision-making approaches employed by schools and government bodies globally. However, these practical applications often lack empirical validation.

Conclusions

This study provides a novel contribution by exploring how researchers can move beyond stand-alone studies focusing on academic performance to gauge the success of different decision-making systems. The study also recommends that practitioners invest in more research-backed systems to create better teaching and learning practices and enhance personalised learning. By highlighting the current gaps and offering forward-looking recommendations, our study clarifies the present landscape and serves as a foundation for future research to improve student learning outcomes.

Abstract Image

推进学校整体决策系统:来自学术研究和实际应用的见解
教育部门越来越认识到经验数据在帮助战略决策和支持个性化学习方面所起的关键作用。对增加和更细致的数据驱动决策的呼吁,主要通过在高等教育中使用学生学习仪表板和学习者档案来解决;它们在K-12环境中的应用和评估仍未得到充分探索。现有的方法往往缺乏强有力的经验证据,并且在现实世界的课堂环境中使用它们的研究有限。本研究旨在通过系统地回顾学校决策系统的学术和非同行评议文献来弥合知识差距。这篇综述的重点是了解所使用的数据类型、仪表板和学习者档案的实施状况,以及在K-2教育中的实际应用。该分析包括19篇学术论文和10篇非同行评议的文献,以研究决策系统的格局。分析显示,虽然学术文献强调了对不同数据类型的利用不足和现实世界评估的缺乏,但非同行评议的文献展示了全球学校和政府机构采用的有前途的整体决策方法。然而,这些实际应用往往缺乏经验验证。本研究通过探索研究人员如何超越专注于学业成绩的独立研究,以衡量不同决策系统的成功,提供了一个新颖的贡献。该研究还建议从业人员投资于更多研究支持的系统,以创造更好的教学和学习实践,并加强个性化学习。通过突出当前的差距并提供前瞻性建议,我们的研究澄清了当前的情况,并为未来的研究奠定了基础,以改善学生的学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信