Kevin L. Nellis, Ronnie Lichtman, Jeffrey Birnbaum, Stanley Friedman, Elise Zwicklbauer
{"title":"Incorporating Gender-Neutral Language in IRB Materials: Perceptions of IRB Professionals","authors":"Kevin L. Nellis, Ronnie Lichtman, Jeffrey Birnbaum, Stanley Friedman, Elise Zwicklbauer","doi":"10.1002/eahr.60022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study investigated the perceptions of institutional review board (IRB) professionals regarding the use of gender-neutral language in IRB guidance and informed consent documents, and whether respondents’ IRBs incorporated gender-neutral language in those documents. A survey was disseminated to a diverse group of IRB professionals whose emails were generated from a list received from the Office for Human Research Protections. Responses indicated substantial endorsement of gender-neutral language, although actual usage remains limited. The findings suggest that while the willingness to adopt inclusive language is high, barriers such as resource limitations and a lack of regulatory guidelines often impede its broader application. This study underscores the importance of developing explicit guidelines and resources to facilitate the adoption of gender-neutral language, enhancing inclusivity in research settings.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"47 3","pages":"30-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.60022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigated the perceptions of institutional review board (IRB) professionals regarding the use of gender-neutral language in IRB guidance and informed consent documents, and whether respondents’ IRBs incorporated gender-neutral language in those documents. A survey was disseminated to a diverse group of IRB professionals whose emails were generated from a list received from the Office for Human Research Protections. Responses indicated substantial endorsement of gender-neutral language, although actual usage remains limited. The findings suggest that while the willingness to adopt inclusive language is high, barriers such as resource limitations and a lack of regulatory guidelines often impede its broader application. This study underscores the importance of developing explicit guidelines and resources to facilitate the adoption of gender-neutral language, enhancing inclusivity in research settings.