Emergency Department Patients with Para-Fluorofentanyl Overdose

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kim Aldy DO , Alex Krotulski PhD , Jeffrey Brent MD, PhD , Sharan Campleman PhD , Rachel Culbreth PhD, MPH , Barry Logan PhD , Paul Wax MD , Alexandra Amaducci DO , Bryan Judge MD , Michael Levine MD , Evan Schwarz MD , Diane P. Calello MD , Christopher W. Meaden MD , Joshua Shulman MD , Adrienne Hughes MD , Robert Hendrickson MD , Joseph Carpenter MD , Jennie Buchanan MD , Alex F. Manini MD, MS , Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Fentalog Study Group
{"title":"Emergency Department Patients with Para-Fluorofentanyl Overdose","authors":"Kim Aldy DO ,&nbsp;Alex Krotulski PhD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Brent MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sharan Campleman PhD ,&nbsp;Rachel Culbreth PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Barry Logan PhD ,&nbsp;Paul Wax MD ,&nbsp;Alexandra Amaducci DO ,&nbsp;Bryan Judge MD ,&nbsp;Michael Levine MD ,&nbsp;Evan Schwarz MD ,&nbsp;Diane P. Calello MD ,&nbsp;Christopher W. Meaden MD ,&nbsp;Joshua Shulman MD ,&nbsp;Adrienne Hughes MD ,&nbsp;Robert Hendrickson MD ,&nbsp;Joseph Carpenter MD ,&nbsp;Jennie Buchanan MD ,&nbsp;Alex F. Manini MD, MS ,&nbsp;Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Fentalog Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fentanyl analogs, such as para-fluorofentanyl (PFF), are increasing in the illicit opioid supply.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study characterizes demographics, clinical effects, and sex differences for naloxone administration in emergency department (ED) patients with confirmed PFF overdose compared with fentanyl.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective observational cohort is from the ToxIC Fentalog Study between 2020 and 2023 at 10 participating U.S. hospitals. Adult patients with suspected opioid overdose presenting to EDs were screened and eligible if waste serum samples were available for comprehensive toxicological analysis. Fentanyl-positive patients were included in this analysis examining associations between PFF and naloxone administration, with stratified analyses for sex differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 4873 screened, 833 were included; 694 PFF negative (PFFN) and 139 PFF positive (PFFP). Mean age was 41 years, and men were predominant (PFFN 73.1% vs. PFFP 69.8%). More than half of PFFP patients presented at 2 of the 10 participating sites, New York (29.8%) and Pennsylvania (21.3%). The most common indication for naloxone was depressed level of consciousness (PFFN 82.1% vs. PFFP 79.8%). PFFP were less likely to receive naloxone doses &gt; 2 mg compared with PFFN (48.2% vs. 60.8%, <em>p</em> = 0.002). After controlling for covariates, PFFP were less likely to receive out-of-hospital naloxone (adjusted odds ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.81–0.94). PFFP men were less likely to receive naloxone doses ≥ 2 mg (adjusted odds ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.42–0.97), but this association was not significant for women.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PFF was present in almost 20% of ED patients with confirmed fentanyl overdose. Although naloxone administration was lower for PFF compared with fentanyl, differences were more pronounced in men. Clinicians and public health officials should be aware of the evolving illicit opioid supply. Future study is warranted to explore the PFF dose response and mechanism behind these observed sex differences due to fentanyl analogs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 56-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467924003664","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fentanyl analogs, such as para-fluorofentanyl (PFF), are increasing in the illicit opioid supply.

Objectives

This study characterizes demographics, clinical effects, and sex differences for naloxone administration in emergency department (ED) patients with confirmed PFF overdose compared with fentanyl.

Methods

This prospective observational cohort is from the ToxIC Fentalog Study between 2020 and 2023 at 10 participating U.S. hospitals. Adult patients with suspected opioid overdose presenting to EDs were screened and eligible if waste serum samples were available for comprehensive toxicological analysis. Fentanyl-positive patients were included in this analysis examining associations between PFF and naloxone administration, with stratified analyses for sex differences.

Results

Of 4873 screened, 833 were included; 694 PFF negative (PFFN) and 139 PFF positive (PFFP). Mean age was 41 years, and men were predominant (PFFN 73.1% vs. PFFP 69.8%). More than half of PFFP patients presented at 2 of the 10 participating sites, New York (29.8%) and Pennsylvania (21.3%). The most common indication for naloxone was depressed level of consciousness (PFFN 82.1% vs. PFFP 79.8%). PFFP were less likely to receive naloxone doses > 2 mg compared with PFFN (48.2% vs. 60.8%, p = 0.002). After controlling for covariates, PFFP were less likely to receive out-of-hospital naloxone (adjusted odds ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.81–0.94). PFFP men were less likely to receive naloxone doses ≥ 2 mg (adjusted odds ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.42–0.97), but this association was not significant for women.

Conclusion

PFF was present in almost 20% of ED patients with confirmed fentanyl overdose. Although naloxone administration was lower for PFF compared with fentanyl, differences were more pronounced in men. Clinicians and public health officials should be aware of the evolving illicit opioid supply. Future study is warranted to explore the PFF dose response and mechanism behind these observed sex differences due to fentanyl analogs.
急诊病人对氟芬太尼过量
芬太尼类似物,如对氟芬太尼(PFF),在非法阿片类药物供应中正在增加。目的:本研究分析急诊科(ED)确诊PFF与芬太尼过量患者纳洛酮给药的人口学特征、临床效果和性别差异。该前瞻性观察队列来自2020年至2023年在10家参与的美国医院进行的毒性芬太罗研究。对出现急诊科的疑似阿片类药物过量的成年患者进行筛选,如果有废血清样本可用于综合毒理学分析,则符合条件。芬太尼阳性患者被纳入本分析,检查PFF与纳洛酮给药之间的关系,并对性别差异进行分层分析。结果筛选4873例,纳入833例;PFF阴性(PFFN) 694例,PFF阳性(PFFP) 139例。平均年龄41岁,男性居多(PFFN 73.1% vs PFFP 69.8%)。超过一半的PFFP患者出现在10个参与地点中的2个,纽约(29.8%)和宾夕法尼亚州(21.3%)。纳洛酮最常见的适应症是意识水平低下(PFFN为82.1%,PFFP为79.8%)。PFFP接受纳洛酮剂量的可能性较小>;2 mg与PFFN比较(48.2%比60.8%,p = 0.002)。在控制协变量后,PFFP不太可能接受院外纳洛酮(校正优势比0.87;95%置信区间0.81-0.94)。PFFP男性接受纳洛酮剂量≥2 mg的可能性较小(校正优势比0.64;95%可信区间0.42-0.97),但这种关联在女性中不显著。结论近20%的芬太尼过量ED患者存在pff。与芬太尼相比,纳洛酮治疗PFF的剂量更低,但在男性中差异更明显。临床医生和公共卫生官员应了解不断发展的非法阿片类药物供应。未来的研究需要探索芬太尼类似物引起的PFF剂量反应和性别差异背后的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信