Bivalirudin infusion at standard or low regimen during elective percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk bleeding patients with acute coronary syndrome: Study protocol for a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yue Li , Junxian Qi , Yinghui Gong , Tienan Zhou , Lei Zhang , Jing Li , Xiaozeng Wang
{"title":"Bivalirudin infusion at standard or low regimen during elective percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk bleeding patients with acute coronary syndrome: Study protocol for a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial","authors":"Yue Li ,&nbsp;Junxian Qi ,&nbsp;Yinghui Gong ,&nbsp;Tienan Zhou ,&nbsp;Lei Zhang ,&nbsp;Jing Li ,&nbsp;Xiaozeng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Bleeding complications associated with anticoagulant therapy should receive more attention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in those considered at high-risk bleeding. The recommended dosage of bivalirudin in clinical guidelines may not be appropriate for East Asian populations. We are performing a trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of a low bivalirudin regimen without prolonging infusion in high-risk bleeding patients with ACS undergoing elective PCI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study is a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial. A total of 2510 patients will be enrolled and randomly (1,1) allocated to either receive the low (80 % of the standard dose) or standard bivalirudin regimen without prolonging the infusion after PCI. The primary endpoint is net adverse clinical events (NACE) at 30 days, which is a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, including all-cause death, repeat revascularization, stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis) and any bleeding events defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This proposed study is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a low versus standard bivalirudin regimen during elective PCI in high-risk bleeding patients with ACS. The results may help achieve dose optimization for the use of perioperative bivalirudin in high-risk bleeding ACS patients undergoing elective PCI.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200064363. Registered on October 4, 2022.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 107941"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714425001351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Bleeding complications associated with anticoagulant therapy should receive more attention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in those considered at high-risk bleeding. The recommended dosage of bivalirudin in clinical guidelines may not be appropriate for East Asian populations. We are performing a trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of a low bivalirudin regimen without prolonging infusion in high-risk bleeding patients with ACS undergoing elective PCI.

Methods

The study is a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial. A total of 2510 patients will be enrolled and randomly (1,1) allocated to either receive the low (80 % of the standard dose) or standard bivalirudin regimen without prolonging the infusion after PCI. The primary endpoint is net adverse clinical events (NACE) at 30 days, which is a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, including all-cause death, repeat revascularization, stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis) and any bleeding events defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC).

Conclusions

This proposed study is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a low versus standard bivalirudin regimen during elective PCI in high-risk bleeding patients with ACS. The results may help achieve dose optimization for the use of perioperative bivalirudin in high-risk bleeding ACS patients undergoing elective PCI.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200064363. Registered on October 4, 2022.
高危出血合并急性冠脉综合征患者择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间标准或低剂量比伐鲁定输注:一项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照试验的研究方案
背景:在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者中,抗凝治疗相关的出血并发症应受到更多的关注,特别是那些被认为是高危出血的患者。临床指南中推荐的比伐鲁定剂量可能不适合东亚人群。我们正在进行一项试验,以调查不延长输注的低比伐鲁定方案在接受选择性PCI的高危出血ACS患者中的有效性和安全性。方法本研究为前瞻性、开放标签、随机对照、非劣效性试验。共纳入2510例患者,随机(1,1)分配到低剂量(标准剂量的80%)或标准比伐鲁定方案,PCI后不延长输注时间。主要终点是30天的净不良临床事件(NACE),这是主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE,包括全因死亡、重复血运重建、中风、非致死性心肌梗死和支架血栓形成)和出血学术研究联盟(BARC)定义的任何出血事件的复合。本研究是首个随机对照试验,旨在评估在ACS高危出血患者择期PCI期间低剂量比伐鲁定方案与标准比伐鲁定方案的疗效和安全性。该结果可能有助于实现比伐鲁定在高危出血ACS患者择期PCI围手术期使用的剂量优化。中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR2200064363。注册于2022年10月4日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信