The “16-gram window” of contact-force: A new criterion for very high-power short-duration ablation

IF 2.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Dimitrios Bismpos MD, Jan Wintrich MD, Valerie Pavlicek MD, Raphael Spittler MD, MSc, Alexander P. Benz MD, Michael Böhm MD, German Fernandez Ferro MD, Felix Mahfoud MD, MA, Thomas Rostock MD, Christian Ukena MD, MA
{"title":"The “16-gram window” of contact-force: A new criterion for very high-power short-duration ablation","authors":"Dimitrios Bismpos MD,&nbsp;Jan Wintrich MD,&nbsp;Valerie Pavlicek MD,&nbsp;Raphael Spittler MD, MSc,&nbsp;Alexander P. Benz MD,&nbsp;Michael Böhm MD,&nbsp;German Fernandez Ferro MD,&nbsp;Felix Mahfoud MD, MA,&nbsp;Thomas Rostock MD,&nbsp;Christian Ukena MD, MA","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) ablation with the novel QDOT™ catheter allows the regulation of target temperature by automatically adjusting flow and power during a 4 s application of 90 W. However, the optimal contact force for sufficient lesion creation is unknown.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We enrolled 73 patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the QDOT catheter in the vHPSD mode (90 W, 4 s). Ablation metrics associated with suboptimal applications, defined as either an impedance drop of ≤5% or a cumulative temperature-limited energy ≤330 J, were collected and analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 3881 vHPSD applications (53.2 applications per patient) with a mean contact force (CF) of 12.8 ± 6.6 g were analyzed. Significant CF variability and intermittent loss of contact were documented in 18.2% and 8.8% of the applications, respectively. A ΔImp ≤ 5% occurred in 3.9% of vHPSD applications, while a cumulative energy ≤ 330 J was observed in 3% of the applications. Applications with a mean CF &lt; 6 g and &gt;22 g were associated with an inadequate impedance drop (10.3%, Phi coefficient 0.118, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and total applied energy (7.8%, Phi coefficient 0.094, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) respectively. At superior PV segments with thick atrial walls, significantly more applications with cumulative energy ≤330 J (4.2% vs. 2.5%; <i>p</i> = .007) were observed, especially when mean CF &gt; 18 g was applied (8.4%, Phi coefficient 0.093, <i>p</i> = .003).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A lower but also a higher mean contact-force was associated with suboptimal vHPSD applications. Hence, a “16-gram window” of contact-force, from 6 to 22 g, could optimize energy application in vHPSD ablation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) ablation with the novel QDOT™ catheter allows the regulation of target temperature by automatically adjusting flow and power during a 4 s application of 90 W. However, the optimal contact force for sufficient lesion creation is unknown.

Methods

We enrolled 73 patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the QDOT catheter in the vHPSD mode (90 W, 4 s). Ablation metrics associated with suboptimal applications, defined as either an impedance drop of ≤5% or a cumulative temperature-limited energy ≤330 J, were collected and analyzed.

Results

A total of 3881 vHPSD applications (53.2 applications per patient) with a mean contact force (CF) of 12.8 ± 6.6 g were analyzed. Significant CF variability and intermittent loss of contact were documented in 18.2% and 8.8% of the applications, respectively. A ΔImp ≤ 5% occurred in 3.9% of vHPSD applications, while a cumulative energy ≤ 330 J was observed in 3% of the applications. Applications with a mean CF < 6 g and >22 g were associated with an inadequate impedance drop (10.3%, Phi coefficient 0.118, p < .001) and total applied energy (7.8%, Phi coefficient 0.094, p < .001) respectively. At superior PV segments with thick atrial walls, significantly more applications with cumulative energy ≤330 J (4.2% vs. 2.5%; p = .007) were observed, especially when mean CF > 18 g was applied (8.4%, Phi coefficient 0.093, p = .003).

Conclusion

A lower but also a higher mean contact-force was associated with suboptimal vHPSD applications. Hence, a “16-gram window” of contact-force, from 6 to 22 g, could optimize energy application in vHPSD ablation.

Abstract Image

接触力的“16克窗口”:非常高功率短时间消融的新标准
使用新型QDOT™导管进行高功率短时间(vHPSD)消融,可以在4秒的90w应用中通过自动调节流量和功率来调节目标温度。然而,产生足够病变的最佳接触力是未知的。方法采用QDOT导管在vHPSD模式下(90 W, 4 s)行肺静脉隔离(PVI)治疗的73例症状性心房颤动患者。收集并分析了与次优应用相关的烧蚀指标,定义为阻抗下降≤5%或累积温度限制能量≤330 J。结果共分析了3881例vHPSD应用(53.2例/例),平均接触力(CF)为12.8±6.6 g。在18.2%和8.8%的应用中分别记录了显著的CF变异性和间歇性接触丢失。在3.9%的vHPSD应用中,ΔImp≤5%,而在3%的应用中,累积能量≤330 J。平均CF值为6 g和22 g的应用分别与阻抗下降不足(10.3%,Phi系数0.118,p < .001)和总应用能量(7.8%,Phi系数0.094,p < .001)相关。在具有厚心房壁的优越PV节段,累积能量≤330 J的应用明显更多(4.2% vs. 2.5%;p = .007),特别是当平均CF >; 18 g时(8.4%,Phi系数0.093,p = .003)。结论较低或较高的平均接触力与vHPSD应用不理想有关。因此,一个“16克窗口”的接触力,从6到22克,可以优化能量在vHPSD消融中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信