Advanced Image Quality Assessment for Hand- and Finger-Vein Biometrics

IF 1.8 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Simon Kirchgasser, Christof Kauba, Georg Wimmer, Andreas Uhl
{"title":"Advanced Image Quality Assessment for Hand- and Finger-Vein Biometrics","authors":"Simon Kirchgasser,&nbsp;Christof Kauba,&nbsp;Georg Wimmer,&nbsp;Andreas Uhl","doi":"10.1049/bme2/8869140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Natural scene statistics commonly used in nonreference image quality measures and a proposed deep-learning (DL)–based quality assessment approach are suggested as biometric quality indicators for vasculature images. While NIQE (natural image quality evaluator) and BRISQUE (blind/referenceless image spatial quality evaluator) if trained in common images with usual distortions do not work well for assessing vasculature pattern samples’ quality, their variants being trained on high- and low-quality vasculature sample data behave as expected from a biometric quality estimator in most cases (deviations from the overall trend occur for certain datasets or feature extraction methods). A DL-based quality metric is proposed in this work and designed to be capable of assigning the correct quality class to the vasculature pattern samples in most cases, independent of finger or hand vein patterns being assessed. The experiments, evaluating NIQE, BRISQUE, and the newly proposed DL quality metrics, were conducted on a total of 13 publicly available finger and hand vein datasets and involve three distinct template representations (two of them especially designed for vascular biometrics). The proposed (trained) quality measure(s) are compared to several classical quality metrics, with their achieved results underlining their promising behavior.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48821,"journal":{"name":"IET Biometrics","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/bme2/8869140","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/bme2/8869140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural scene statistics commonly used in nonreference image quality measures and a proposed deep-learning (DL)–based quality assessment approach are suggested as biometric quality indicators for vasculature images. While NIQE (natural image quality evaluator) and BRISQUE (blind/referenceless image spatial quality evaluator) if trained in common images with usual distortions do not work well for assessing vasculature pattern samples’ quality, their variants being trained on high- and low-quality vasculature sample data behave as expected from a biometric quality estimator in most cases (deviations from the overall trend occur for certain datasets or feature extraction methods). A DL-based quality metric is proposed in this work and designed to be capable of assigning the correct quality class to the vasculature pattern samples in most cases, independent of finger or hand vein patterns being assessed. The experiments, evaluating NIQE, BRISQUE, and the newly proposed DL quality metrics, were conducted on a total of 13 publicly available finger and hand vein datasets and involve three distinct template representations (two of them especially designed for vascular biometrics). The proposed (trained) quality measure(s) are compared to several classical quality metrics, with their achieved results underlining their promising behavior.

Abstract Image

手部和手指静脉生物识别的高级图像质量评估
提出了非参考图像质量度量中常用的自然场景统计和基于深度学习(DL)的质量评估方法作为血管图像的生物特征质量指标。虽然NIQE(自然图像质量评估器)和BRISQUE(盲/无参考图像空间质量评估器)如果在具有通常失真的普通图像中进行训练,则不能很好地评估血管模式样本的质量,但在大多数情况下,它们的变体在高质量和低质量血管样本数据上进行训练,其行为与生物特征质量估计器的预期一致(某些数据集或特征提取方法会出现总体趋势的偏差)。在这项工作中提出了一种基于dl的质量度量,旨在能够在大多数情况下为血管模式样本分配正确的质量等级,独立于正在评估的手指或手静脉模式。该实验评估了NIQE、BRISQUE和新提出的DL质量指标,共在13个公开可用的手指和手静脉数据集上进行,涉及三种不同的模板表示(其中两种专门为血管生物识别设计)。建议的(训练的)质量度量与几个经典的质量度量进行比较,它们的实现结果强调了它们有希望的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IET Biometrics
IET Biometrics COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: The field of biometric recognition - automated recognition of individuals based on their behavioural and biological characteristics - has now reached a level of maturity where viable practical applications are both possible and increasingly available. The biometrics field is characterised especially by its interdisciplinarity since, while focused primarily around a strong technological base, effective system design and implementation often requires a broad range of skills encompassing, for example, human factors, data security and database technologies, psychological and physiological awareness, and so on. Also, the technology focus itself embraces diversity, since the engineering of effective biometric systems requires integration of image analysis, pattern recognition, sensor technology, database engineering, security design and many other strands of understanding. The scope of the journal is intentionally relatively wide. While focusing on core technological issues, it is recognised that these may be inherently diverse and in many cases may cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The scope of the journal will therefore include any topics where it can be shown that a paper can increase our understanding of biometric systems, signal future developments and applications for biometrics, or promote greater practical uptake for relevant technologies: Development and enhancement of individual biometric modalities including the established and traditional modalities (e.g. face, fingerprint, iris, signature and handwriting recognition) and also newer or emerging modalities (gait, ear-shape, neurological patterns, etc.) Multibiometrics, theoretical and practical issues, implementation of practical systems, multiclassifier and multimodal approaches Soft biometrics and information fusion for identification, verification and trait prediction Human factors and the human-computer interface issues for biometric systems, exception handling strategies Template construction and template management, ageing factors and their impact on biometric systems Usability and user-oriented design, psychological and physiological principles and system integration Sensors and sensor technologies for biometric processing Database technologies to support biometric systems Implementation of biometric systems, security engineering implications, smartcard and associated technologies in implementation, implementation platforms, system design and performance evaluation Trust and privacy issues, security of biometric systems and supporting technological solutions, biometric template protection Biometric cryptosystems, security and biometrics-linked encryption Links with forensic processing and cross-disciplinary commonalities Core underpinning technologies (e.g. image analysis, pattern recognition, computer vision, signal processing, etc.), where the specific relevance to biometric processing can be demonstrated Applications and application-led considerations Position papers on technology or on the industrial context of biometric system development Adoption and promotion of standards in biometrics, improving technology acceptance, deployment and interoperability, avoiding cross-cultural and cross-sector restrictions Relevant ethical and social issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信