Assessing patient satisfaction and identifying areas for improvement in gynecological care across various healthcare settings at a tertiary teaching hospital in Pakistan: A cross-sectional study
S.I. Memon , A. Aijaz , R. Jameel , M. Shafique , Y. Khan
{"title":"Assessing patient satisfaction and identifying areas for improvement in gynecological care across various healthcare settings at a tertiary teaching hospital in Pakistan: A cross-sectional study","authors":"S.I. Memon , A. Aijaz , R. Jameel , M. Shafique , Y. Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality and essential for improving hospital services. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction and to identify areas for improvement in gynecological care across inpatient, outpatient, and emergency settings.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional study among 587 gynecological patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. We assessed multiple dimensions of patient care, such as doctor satisfaction, nursing care, housekeeping services, and value for money using simple random sampling. We used a standard questionnaire to gauge patient satisfaction with care and analyzed the data using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. We considered a <em>p</em>-value of less than 95% to be statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis revealed high satisfaction rates across all service areas. Doctor satisfaction scored the highest at 95.4% (95% CI: 0.929–0.978, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0001), followed by value for money at 90.4% (95% CI: 0.870–0.939, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0001). Housekeeping and nursing care were rated 86.2% (95% CI: 0.821–0.902, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0001) and 83.3% (95% CI: 0.790-0.877, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0001), respectively. The hospital achieved a 98.9% recommendation rate, with 54.3% rating their experience as “Excellent,” 36.9% as “Good,” 7.8% as “Average,” and only 1.1% as “Bad.”</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights high patient satisfaction in gynecological services, reflected in strong recommendations and positive feedback. While physician care is well-rated, improvements in nursing and housekeeping through enhanced communication are needed. These findings support quality enhancement efforts, fostering a blame-free culture and setting a benchmark for similar institutions in Pakistan.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":"40 5","pages":"Article 101132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647925000442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality and essential for improving hospital services. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction and to identify areas for improvement in gynecological care across inpatient, outpatient, and emergency settings.
Material and methods
We conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional study among 587 gynecological patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. We assessed multiple dimensions of patient care, such as doctor satisfaction, nursing care, housekeeping services, and value for money using simple random sampling. We used a standard questionnaire to gauge patient satisfaction with care and analyzed the data using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. We considered a p-value of less than 95% to be statistically significant.
Results
The analysis revealed high satisfaction rates across all service areas. Doctor satisfaction scored the highest at 95.4% (95% CI: 0.929–0.978, p < 0.0001), followed by value for money at 90.4% (95% CI: 0.870–0.939, p < 0.0001). Housekeeping and nursing care were rated 86.2% (95% CI: 0.821–0.902, p < 0.0001) and 83.3% (95% CI: 0.790-0.877, p < 0.0001), respectively. The hospital achieved a 98.9% recommendation rate, with 54.3% rating their experience as “Excellent,” 36.9% as “Good,” 7.8% as “Average,” and only 1.1% as “Bad.”
Conclusions
This study highlights high patient satisfaction in gynecological services, reflected in strong recommendations and positive feedback. While physician care is well-rated, improvements in nursing and housekeeping through enhanced communication are needed. These findings support quality enhancement efforts, fostering a blame-free culture and setting a benchmark for similar institutions in Pakistan.
期刊介绍:
Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)