Ergonomic design of shoe inserts for reducing lower extremity musculoskeletal discomfort in male Participants: An analysis of shape and size

IF 3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Waseem Ahmad , Md Sarfaraz Alam
{"title":"Ergonomic design of shoe inserts for reducing lower extremity musculoskeletal discomfort in male Participants: An analysis of shape and size","authors":"Waseem Ahmad ,&nbsp;Md Sarfaraz Alam","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The human foot endures substantial forces during daily activities such as walking and standing, often bearing loads 1.5 to 5 times the individual's body weight. These forces propagate through the lower extremity musculoskeletal structures, placing stress on critical joints, which can lead to discomfort, musculoskeletal issues, and reduced productivity. Shoe inserts (SIs) have emerged as effective ergonomic interventions, provided additional support and redistributed pressure to alleviate discomfort and enhance gait stability.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study investigates the ergonomic effects of shoe insert placement, shape, and surface area on perceived comfort and plantar pressure distribution during static standing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-six healthy male participants were assessed using flat and contoured inserts of varying surface areas (30 × 30 mm<sup>2</sup>, 40 × 40 mm<sup>2</sup>, and 50 × 50 mm<sup>2</sup>). Comfort ratings were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), while plantar pressures (peak and mean) were evaluated using F-Scan sensors. Data were analysed using paired t-tests and repeated-measures ANOVA, with Bonferroni corrections applied for multiple comparisons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Inserts placed 2–4 cm anterior to the lateral midfoot region provided the highest comfort ratings. Contoured inserts consistently outperformed flat designs in improving comfort and reducing plantar pressures across all surface areas (p &lt; 0.017). Larger surface area inserts (50 × 50 mm<sup>2</sup>) were the most effective in enhancing subjective and objective outcomes, demonstrating significant improvements compared to smaller designs (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study underscores the importance of precise placement, contoured designs, and larger surface areas in optimizing the ergonomic benefits of shoe inserts. These findings have practical implications for the design of ergonomic footwear and orthotics, particularly for individuals in occupations requiring prolonged standing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 103754"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814125000605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The human foot endures substantial forces during daily activities such as walking and standing, often bearing loads 1.5 to 5 times the individual's body weight. These forces propagate through the lower extremity musculoskeletal structures, placing stress on critical joints, which can lead to discomfort, musculoskeletal issues, and reduced productivity. Shoe inserts (SIs) have emerged as effective ergonomic interventions, provided additional support and redistributed pressure to alleviate discomfort and enhance gait stability.

Objective

This study investigates the ergonomic effects of shoe insert placement, shape, and surface area on perceived comfort and plantar pressure distribution during static standing.

Methods

Twenty-six healthy male participants were assessed using flat and contoured inserts of varying surface areas (30 × 30 mm2, 40 × 40 mm2, and 50 × 50 mm2). Comfort ratings were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), while plantar pressures (peak and mean) were evaluated using F-Scan sensors. Data were analysed using paired t-tests and repeated-measures ANOVA, with Bonferroni corrections applied for multiple comparisons.

Results

Inserts placed 2–4 cm anterior to the lateral midfoot region provided the highest comfort ratings. Contoured inserts consistently outperformed flat designs in improving comfort and reducing plantar pressures across all surface areas (p < 0.017). Larger surface area inserts (50 × 50 mm2) were the most effective in enhancing subjective and objective outcomes, demonstrating significant improvements compared to smaller designs (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study underscores the importance of precise placement, contoured designs, and larger surface areas in optimizing the ergonomic benefits of shoe inserts. These findings have practical implications for the design of ergonomic footwear and orthotics, particularly for individuals in occupations requiring prolonged standing.
减少男性参与者下肢肌肉骨骼不适的鞋垫的人体工程学设计:形状和尺寸的分析
在日常活动中,如走路和站立,人的脚承受着巨大的力量,通常承受着个人体重的1.5至5倍的负荷。这些力量通过下肢肌肉骨骼结构传播,对关键关节施加压力,这可能导致不适,肌肉骨骼问题,并降低生产力。鞋垫(si)已成为有效的人体工程学干预措施,提供额外的支持和重新分配压力,以减轻不适和增强步态稳定性。目的探讨静站立时鞋垫的位置、形状和表面积对感知舒适性和足底压力分布的人体工程学影响。方法采用不同表面积(30 × 30 mm2、40 × 40 mm2和50 × 50 mm2)的平面和轮廓刀片对26名健康男性受试者进行评估。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量舒适度评分,使用F-Scan传感器评估足底压力(峰值和平均值)。数据分析采用配对t检验和重复测量方差分析,多重比较采用Bonferroni校正。结果放置在外侧中足区前2-4 cm处的支架舒适度评分最高。在提高舒适性和减少所有表面区域的足底压力方面,轮廓插入始终优于平面设计(p <;0.017)。较大表面积的植入物(50 × 50 mm2)在增强主观和客观结果方面最有效,与较小的设计相比,显示出显着的改善(p <;0.001)。结论:本研究强调了精确放置、轮廓设计和更大表面积在优化鞋内垫的人体工程学效益方面的重要性。这些发现对人体工程学鞋类和矫形器的设计具有实际意义,特别是对需要长时间站立的职业的个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信