{"title":"Ergonomic design of shoe inserts for reducing lower extremity musculoskeletal discomfort in male Participants: An analysis of shape and size","authors":"Waseem Ahmad , Md Sarfaraz Alam","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The human foot endures substantial forces during daily activities such as walking and standing, often bearing loads 1.5 to 5 times the individual's body weight. These forces propagate through the lower extremity musculoskeletal structures, placing stress on critical joints, which can lead to discomfort, musculoskeletal issues, and reduced productivity. Shoe inserts (SIs) have emerged as effective ergonomic interventions, provided additional support and redistributed pressure to alleviate discomfort and enhance gait stability.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study investigates the ergonomic effects of shoe insert placement, shape, and surface area on perceived comfort and plantar pressure distribution during static standing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-six healthy male participants were assessed using flat and contoured inserts of varying surface areas (30 × 30 mm<sup>2</sup>, 40 × 40 mm<sup>2</sup>, and 50 × 50 mm<sup>2</sup>). Comfort ratings were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), while plantar pressures (peak and mean) were evaluated using F-Scan sensors. Data were analysed using paired t-tests and repeated-measures ANOVA, with Bonferroni corrections applied for multiple comparisons.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Inserts placed 2–4 cm anterior to the lateral midfoot region provided the highest comfort ratings. Contoured inserts consistently outperformed flat designs in improving comfort and reducing plantar pressures across all surface areas (p < 0.017). Larger surface area inserts (50 × 50 mm<sup>2</sup>) were the most effective in enhancing subjective and objective outcomes, demonstrating significant improvements compared to smaller designs (p < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study underscores the importance of precise placement, contoured designs, and larger surface areas in optimizing the ergonomic benefits of shoe inserts. These findings have practical implications for the design of ergonomic footwear and orthotics, particularly for individuals in occupations requiring prolonged standing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 103754"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814125000605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The human foot endures substantial forces during daily activities such as walking and standing, often bearing loads 1.5 to 5 times the individual's body weight. These forces propagate through the lower extremity musculoskeletal structures, placing stress on critical joints, which can lead to discomfort, musculoskeletal issues, and reduced productivity. Shoe inserts (SIs) have emerged as effective ergonomic interventions, provided additional support and redistributed pressure to alleviate discomfort and enhance gait stability.
Objective
This study investigates the ergonomic effects of shoe insert placement, shape, and surface area on perceived comfort and plantar pressure distribution during static standing.
Methods
Twenty-six healthy male participants were assessed using flat and contoured inserts of varying surface areas (30 × 30 mm2, 40 × 40 mm2, and 50 × 50 mm2). Comfort ratings were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), while plantar pressures (peak and mean) were evaluated using F-Scan sensors. Data were analysed using paired t-tests and repeated-measures ANOVA, with Bonferroni corrections applied for multiple comparisons.
Results
Inserts placed 2–4 cm anterior to the lateral midfoot region provided the highest comfort ratings. Contoured inserts consistently outperformed flat designs in improving comfort and reducing plantar pressures across all surface areas (p < 0.017). Larger surface area inserts (50 × 50 mm2) were the most effective in enhancing subjective and objective outcomes, demonstrating significant improvements compared to smaller designs (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
This study underscores the importance of precise placement, contoured designs, and larger surface areas in optimizing the ergonomic benefits of shoe inserts. These findings have practical implications for the design of ergonomic footwear and orthotics, particularly for individuals in occupations requiring prolonged standing.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.