Zhitao Chen , Zelin Yang , Caichao Gan , Qiucheng Liu , Wenpeng Xu
{"title":"Provenance study of sequan porcelain bowls from two shipwrecks near Nanri Island, Fujian, China","authors":"Zhitao Chen , Zelin Yang , Caichao Gan , Qiucheng Liu , Wenpeng Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2025.100620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Determining the provenance of mass-produced traded porcelain remains a significant challenge in archaeological research, yet accurate sourcing is essential for understanding historical trade routes, networks, and practices. While previous studies have focused on shipwreck cargo from well-known kiln sites, common wares lacking distinctive stylistic features have received less attention. This study employs portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) analysis to investigate the provenance of <em>sequan</em> porcelain bowls—a type of low-quality bowl characterized by an unglazed ring on the inner bottom, commonly produced across numerous kiln sites—from two 13th–14th-century shipwrecks (the Beiri Rock No. 6 and the Beitugui Reef No. 2) near Nanri Island, Fujian, China. Reference samples were collected from three potential source kilns in coastal Fujian—Pukou, Zhuangbian, and Dongmen kilns—for comparison. The results show that all <em>sequan</em> bowls from both shipwrecks were likely sourced from the Pukou kiln, with the <em>sequan</em> bowls from the two ships possibly originating from different subregions within the Pukou kiln complex. Considering that both shipwrecks are located south of the Pukou kiln, we speculate that the ships were en route southward, possibly heading toward Quanzhou to fulfill customs registration for maritime trade. These findings underscore the effectiveness of pXRF for precise and refined provenance studies of ordinary porcelains, while also providing new insights into the maritime trade of in 13th–14th century Asia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100620"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Research in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226725000303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Determining the provenance of mass-produced traded porcelain remains a significant challenge in archaeological research, yet accurate sourcing is essential for understanding historical trade routes, networks, and practices. While previous studies have focused on shipwreck cargo from well-known kiln sites, common wares lacking distinctive stylistic features have received less attention. This study employs portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) analysis to investigate the provenance of sequan porcelain bowls—a type of low-quality bowl characterized by an unglazed ring on the inner bottom, commonly produced across numerous kiln sites—from two 13th–14th-century shipwrecks (the Beiri Rock No. 6 and the Beitugui Reef No. 2) near Nanri Island, Fujian, China. Reference samples were collected from three potential source kilns in coastal Fujian—Pukou, Zhuangbian, and Dongmen kilns—for comparison. The results show that all sequan bowls from both shipwrecks were likely sourced from the Pukou kiln, with the sequan bowls from the two ships possibly originating from different subregions within the Pukou kiln complex. Considering that both shipwrecks are located south of the Pukou kiln, we speculate that the ships were en route southward, possibly heading toward Quanzhou to fulfill customs registration for maritime trade. These findings underscore the effectiveness of pXRF for precise and refined provenance studies of ordinary porcelains, while also providing new insights into the maritime trade of in 13th–14th century Asia.
期刊介绍:
Archaeological Research in Asia presents high quality scholarly research conducted in between the Bosporus and the Pacific on a broad range of archaeological subjects of importance to audiences across Asia and around the world. The journal covers the traditional components of archaeology: placing events and patterns in time and space; analysis of past lifeways; and explanations for cultural processes and change. To this end, the publication will highlight theoretical and methodological advances in studying the past, present new data, and detail patterns that reshape our understanding of it. Archaeological Research in Asia publishes work on the full temporal range of archaeological inquiry from the earliest human presence in Asia with a special emphasis on time periods under-represented in other venues. Journal contributions are of three kinds: articles, case reports and short communications. Full length articles should present synthetic treatments, novel analyses, or theoretical approaches to unresolved issues. Case reports present basic data on subjects that are of broad interest because they represent key sites, sequences, and subjects that figure prominently, or should figure prominently, in how scholars both inside and outside Asia understand the archaeology of cultural and biological change through time. Short communications present new findings (e.g., radiocarbon dates) that are important to the extent that they reaffirm or change the way scholars in Asia and around the world think about Asian cultural or biological history.