Amir Nourmohammadi , Taha Arbaoui , Masood Fathi , Alexandre Dolgui
{"title":"Balancing human–robot collaborative assembly lines: A constraint programming approach","authors":"Amir Nourmohammadi , Taha Arbaoui , Masood Fathi , Alexandre Dolgui","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2025.111154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The advent of Industry 5.0 and advancements in collaborative robot (cobot) technology have driven many industries to adopt human–robot collaboration (HRC) in their assembly lines. This collaborative approach, which combines human expertise with robotic precision, necessitates an optimized method for balancing and scheduling tasks and operators across stations. This study proposes various constraint programming (CP) models tailored to straight and U-shaped assembly layouts, with objectives such as minimizing the number of stations, reducing cycle time, and minimizing costs. To enhance real-world applicability, the models consider the presence of diverse humans and cobots with varying skills and energy requirements working collaboratively or concurrently on assembly tasks. Additionally, practical constraints are addressed, including robot tool changes, zoning, and technological needs. Computational results demonstrate the superior efficiency of the proposed CP models over state-of-the-art mixed-integer programming models, validated through a case study and a comprehensive set of test problems. The results indicate that U-shaped layouts offer greater flexibility than straight-line configurations, particularly in reducing cycle time. Furthermore, higher HRC levels, including more humans and cobots, can significantly improve the number of stations, cycle time, and cost by up to 50%, 29%, and 36%, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 111154"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835225003006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The advent of Industry 5.0 and advancements in collaborative robot (cobot) technology have driven many industries to adopt human–robot collaboration (HRC) in their assembly lines. This collaborative approach, which combines human expertise with robotic precision, necessitates an optimized method for balancing and scheduling tasks and operators across stations. This study proposes various constraint programming (CP) models tailored to straight and U-shaped assembly layouts, with objectives such as minimizing the number of stations, reducing cycle time, and minimizing costs. To enhance real-world applicability, the models consider the presence of diverse humans and cobots with varying skills and energy requirements working collaboratively or concurrently on assembly tasks. Additionally, practical constraints are addressed, including robot tool changes, zoning, and technological needs. Computational results demonstrate the superior efficiency of the proposed CP models over state-of-the-art mixed-integer programming models, validated through a case study and a comprehensive set of test problems. The results indicate that U-shaped layouts offer greater flexibility than straight-line configurations, particularly in reducing cycle time. Furthermore, higher HRC levels, including more humans and cobots, can significantly improve the number of stations, cycle time, and cost by up to 50%, 29%, and 36%, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.