Risk Mitigation Measures Captured by a Tertiary Hospital's Disaster Simulation: An Observational Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Faran Shoaib Naru, Janet C. Long, Kate Churruca, Mitchell Sarkies, Jeffrey Braithwaite
{"title":"Risk Mitigation Measures Captured by a Tertiary Hospital's Disaster Simulation: An Observational Study","authors":"Faran Shoaib Naru,&nbsp;Janet C. Long,&nbsp;Kate Churruca,&nbsp;Mitchell Sarkies,&nbsp;Jeffrey Braithwaite","doi":"10.1111/jep.70113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To document the challenges experienced and adaptations made during a simulated hospital disaster, and consider the implications of the observations for hospital disaster preparedness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Nonparticipant observational assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Nonparticipant observations of an exercise simulating a disaster were undertaken by two researchers. The researchers shadowed triage team members, complementing this with observations of the Hospital-Emergency-Operations-Centre, theaters, wards, and Emergency Department subsections such as Resuscitation, Acute, Minor-Injuries-Clinic, Children's emergency, and Mental health. Field notes were coded line-by-line through an inductive thematic analysis, which synthesized both challenges and observed adaptations to those challenges.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The major challenges observed were deaths due to lack of critical care equipment, management of high number of minor injuries, lack of situational awareness, shortage of orderlies, and difficulties in patient tracking and bed allocations. Observed adaptations included pediatricians' treatment of adult patients with minor injuries, fast-tracking triage through ranking, manual ventilation during transfers, and batching of patients requiring imaging to utilize limited orderlies for transfers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This observational study distills both challenges that clinicians may face in real disasters, and the improvisations that they can make to manage mass casualties.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for Clinical Professions</h3>\n \n <p>Research findings hold promising potential in enhancing clinicians' disaster preparedness by articulating specific interventions on mass-casualty management within limited resources.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>Unforeseen challenges arise when clinicians are confronted with disaster casualties. This study addresses that problem by not only preempting such challenges, but by also discussing practical solutions. The findings can enable a positive impact on clinicians' readiness for mass casualty influx.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>The 21-item checklist of the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Although this study was not focused on a patient population, our research institute incorporates healthcare consumers' advice in all our work.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70113","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To document the challenges experienced and adaptations made during a simulated hospital disaster, and consider the implications of the observations for hospital disaster preparedness.

Design

Nonparticipant observational assessment.

Methods

Nonparticipant observations of an exercise simulating a disaster were undertaken by two researchers. The researchers shadowed triage team members, complementing this with observations of the Hospital-Emergency-Operations-Centre, theaters, wards, and Emergency Department subsections such as Resuscitation, Acute, Minor-Injuries-Clinic, Children's emergency, and Mental health. Field notes were coded line-by-line through an inductive thematic analysis, which synthesized both challenges and observed adaptations to those challenges.

Results

The major challenges observed were deaths due to lack of critical care equipment, management of high number of minor injuries, lack of situational awareness, shortage of orderlies, and difficulties in patient tracking and bed allocations. Observed adaptations included pediatricians' treatment of adult patients with minor injuries, fast-tracking triage through ranking, manual ventilation during transfers, and batching of patients requiring imaging to utilize limited orderlies for transfers.

Conclusion

This observational study distills both challenges that clinicians may face in real disasters, and the improvisations that they can make to manage mass casualties.

Implications for Clinical Professions

Research findings hold promising potential in enhancing clinicians' disaster preparedness by articulating specific interventions on mass-casualty management within limited resources.

Impact

Unforeseen challenges arise when clinicians are confronted with disaster casualties. This study addresses that problem by not only preempting such challenges, but by also discussing practical solutions. The findings can enable a positive impact on clinicians' readiness for mass casualty influx.

Reporting Method

The 21-item checklist of the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).

Patient or Public Contribution

Although this study was not focused on a patient population, our research institute incorporates healthcare consumers' advice in all our work.

Abstract Image

某三级医院灾害模拟捕获的风险缓解措施:一项观察性研究
目的记录在模拟医院灾难期间所经历的挑战和作出的调整,并考虑观察结果对医院备灾的影响。设计非参与者观察性评估。方法由两名研究人员对模拟灾难的演习进行非参与性观察。研究人员对分诊小组成员进行了跟踪调查,并对医院急诊操作中心、剧院、病房和急诊部门的分支(如复苏、急症、轻伤诊所、儿童急诊和心理健康)进行了观察。实地记录通过归纳性专题分析逐行编码,综合了挑战和观察对这些挑战的适应情况。结果观察到的主要挑战是缺乏重症监护设备导致的死亡、大量轻伤的管理、缺乏态势感知、护理员短缺以及患者跟踪和床位分配困难。观察到的适应性包括儿科医生对轻伤成人患者的治疗,通过排名快速分类,转运过程中的人工通气,以及需要成像的患者分批使用有限的转运护理员。这项观察性研究提炼了临床医生在实际灾难中可能面临的挑战,以及他们可以在管理大规模伤亡时做出的即兴发挥。研究结果表明,在有限的资源范围内,通过阐明大规模伤亡管理的具体干预措施,有可能提高临床医生的备灾能力。当临床医生面对灾害伤亡时,不可预见的挑战就会出现。这项研究解决了这个问题,不仅先发制人,而且还讨论了实际的解决方案。研究结果可以对临床医生应对大规模伤亡涌入的准备工作产生积极影响。报告方法定性研究报告标准(SRQR)的21项清单。患者或公众贡献虽然这项研究的重点不是患者群体,但我们的研究所在我们所有的工作中都纳入了医疗保健消费者的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信