Development and Real-Time Clinical Application of New Transcription-Less Discourse Assessment Approaches for Arabic Speakers With Aphasia

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Reem S. W. Alyahya
{"title":"Development and Real-Time Clinical Application of New Transcription-Less Discourse Assessment Approaches for Arabic Speakers With Aphasia","authors":"Reem S. W. Alyahya","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Assessing spoken discourse during aphasia clinical examination is crucial for diagnostic and rehabilitation purposes. Recent approaches have been developed to quantify content word fluency (CWF) and informativeness of spoken discourse without the need to perform time-consuming transcription and coding. However, the accuracy of these approaches has not been examined in real-time clinical settings, and they have been developed and validated mainly in English and thus cannot be applied to other languages.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>For the first time: (i) to create and validate CWF checklists and main concept (MC) lists in Arabic; (ii) to examine the application of these two approaches in real-time clinical settings with people with aphasia (PWA) while they are performing the task; and (iii) to investigate whether these two approaches can differentiate discourse responses produced by PWA versus neurotypical adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The Arabic Discourse Assessment Tool (ADAT) was used to collect discourse responses on three tasks (composite picture description, storytelling narrative, and procedural discourse) from 70 neurotypical control adults and 50 PWA matched to the control group in age and education. The discourse samples were transcribed, and analysed. For each task, CWF checklists and MC lists were developed and validated using discourse reponses from the control group. Afterwards, the application of these two approaches in real-time clinical settings was examined with the aphasia groups. The psychometric properties of CWF and MC approches were examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Novel Arabic CWF checklists and MC lists were successfully developed, validated, and applied clinically for three discourse tasks. The analysis showed significant high accuracy between CWF scores obtained in real-time clinical settings and those identified using the traditional approach of transcribing and analysing discourse samples across all three discourse tasks (ICC = 0.88 to 0.94). Furthermore, significant excellent reliability (<i>ICC</i> = 0.917 to 0.994) were found for the three tasks in both groups. Most of the MCs were produced accurately and completely by neurotypical control adults, whereas they were mostly absent in PWA. CWF checklists and MC lists showed significant high validity in distinguishing spoken discourse produced by PWA from those produced by neurotypical adults at <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This is the first study to develop and validate novel Arabic CWF checklists and MC lists. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that the CWF approach and main concept analysis (MCA) can be applied clinically in real-time with PWA. These transcription-less approaches can be used as part of the routine aphasia clinical examination to provide quick but accurate assessments of CWF (microlinguistics) and informativeness (macrolinguistics) of spoken discourse in PWA. These approaches also provide a significant resource for Arabic speakers with aphasia, that will lead to accurate aphasia assessments and better clinical management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <div><i>What is already known on the subject</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>Conversations between people rely heavily on producing relevant and informative spoken discourse. Thus, there has been increased interest in the application of discourse tasks in clinical practice to enable a comprehensive assessment of expressive language and functional communication. However, utilising discourse tasks in clinical settings is impractical because their administration and scoring are time-consuming, labour-heavy, and must be completed after the session has ended. Therefore, transcription-less, efficient, and accurate approaches to analyse discourse responses have been developed and validated in English. However, no study has investigated the application of these approaches in real-time clinical settings with people with aphasia (PWA).</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div><i>What this study adds</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>To our knowledge, this is the first study to (i) develop and validate content word fluency (CWF) checklists and main concept (MC) lists in Arabic. These were created for three discourse tasks (composite picture description, storytelling narratives, and procedural discourse) using discourse responses from a neurotypical control group; and (ii) examine the application of these valid, transcription-less, efficient, and accurate approaches to assess CWF and informativeness of spoken discourse in PWA in real-time clinical settings.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div><i>What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>The transcription-less, efficient, and accurate discourse assessment approaches that have been developed and validated in this study allow clinicians to objectively assess discourse responses produced by Arabic speakers with aphasia during clinical examinations while the person is speaking without the need for offline transcription, analyses, and scoring. The reliable application of these approaches in real-time clinical settings encourages clinicians to incorporate discourse tasks as part of their routine clinical examination with PWA to be used (i) for a comprehensive assessment of expressive language skills beyond words and sentences, (ii) to guide the development of personalised therapy goals and strategies to improve functional communication, and (iii) as outcome measurements to monitor spontaneous recovery and changes in response to interventions.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70043","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Assessing spoken discourse during aphasia clinical examination is crucial for diagnostic and rehabilitation purposes. Recent approaches have been developed to quantify content word fluency (CWF) and informativeness of spoken discourse without the need to perform time-consuming transcription and coding. However, the accuracy of these approaches has not been examined in real-time clinical settings, and they have been developed and validated mainly in English and thus cannot be applied to other languages.

Aims

For the first time: (i) to create and validate CWF checklists and main concept (MC) lists in Arabic; (ii) to examine the application of these two approaches in real-time clinical settings with people with aphasia (PWA) while they are performing the task; and (iii) to investigate whether these two approaches can differentiate discourse responses produced by PWA versus neurotypical adults.

Methods

The Arabic Discourse Assessment Tool (ADAT) was used to collect discourse responses on three tasks (composite picture description, storytelling narrative, and procedural discourse) from 70 neurotypical control adults and 50 PWA matched to the control group in age and education. The discourse samples were transcribed, and analysed. For each task, CWF checklists and MC lists were developed and validated using discourse reponses from the control group. Afterwards, the application of these two approaches in real-time clinical settings was examined with the aphasia groups. The psychometric properties of CWF and MC approches were examined.

Results

Novel Arabic CWF checklists and MC lists were successfully developed, validated, and applied clinically for three discourse tasks. The analysis showed significant high accuracy between CWF scores obtained in real-time clinical settings and those identified using the traditional approach of transcribing and analysing discourse samples across all three discourse tasks (ICC = 0.88 to 0.94). Furthermore, significant excellent reliability (ICC = 0.917 to 0.994) were found for the three tasks in both groups. Most of the MCs were produced accurately and completely by neurotypical control adults, whereas they were mostly absent in PWA. CWF checklists and MC lists showed significant high validity in distinguishing spoken discourse produced by PWA from those produced by neurotypical adults at p < 0.001.

Conclusions

This is the first study to develop and validate novel Arabic CWF checklists and MC lists. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that the CWF approach and main concept analysis (MCA) can be applied clinically in real-time with PWA. These transcription-less approaches can be used as part of the routine aphasia clinical examination to provide quick but accurate assessments of CWF (microlinguistics) and informativeness (macrolinguistics) of spoken discourse in PWA. These approaches also provide a significant resource for Arabic speakers with aphasia, that will lead to accurate aphasia assessments and better clinical management.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject
  • Conversations between people rely heavily on producing relevant and informative spoken discourse. Thus, there has been increased interest in the application of discourse tasks in clinical practice to enable a comprehensive assessment of expressive language and functional communication. However, utilising discourse tasks in clinical settings is impractical because their administration and scoring are time-consuming, labour-heavy, and must be completed after the session has ended. Therefore, transcription-less, efficient, and accurate approaches to analyse discourse responses have been developed and validated in English. However, no study has investigated the application of these approaches in real-time clinical settings with people with aphasia (PWA).
What this study adds
  • To our knowledge, this is the first study to (i) develop and validate content word fluency (CWF) checklists and main concept (MC) lists in Arabic. These were created for three discourse tasks (composite picture description, storytelling narratives, and procedural discourse) using discourse responses from a neurotypical control group; and (ii) examine the application of these valid, transcription-less, efficient, and accurate approaches to assess CWF and informativeness of spoken discourse in PWA in real-time clinical settings.
What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?
  • The transcription-less, efficient, and accurate discourse assessment approaches that have been developed and validated in this study allow clinicians to objectively assess discourse responses produced by Arabic speakers with aphasia during clinical examinations while the person is speaking without the need for offline transcription, analyses, and scoring. The reliable application of these approaches in real-time clinical settings encourages clinicians to incorporate discourse tasks as part of their routine clinical examination with PWA to be used (i) for a comprehensive assessment of expressive language skills beyond words and sentences, (ii) to guide the development of personalised therapy goals and strategies to improve functional communication, and (iii) as outcome measurements to monitor spontaneous recovery and changes in response to interventions.

Abstract Image

阿拉伯语失语症新的无转录语篇评估方法的开发和实时临床应用
背景在失语症临床检查中评估口语话语对失语症的诊断和康复至关重要。最近的方法已经开发量化内容词流畅性(CWF)和信息的口语话语不需要执行耗时的转录和编码。然而,这些方法的准确性尚未在实时临床环境中得到检验,而且它们主要是在英语中开发和验证的,因此不能应用于其他语言。第一次的目标:(i)创建和验证阿拉伯语的CWF清单和主要概念清单;(ii)在失语症患者(PWA)执行任务时,研究这两种方法在实时临床环境中的应用;(iii)研究这两种方法是否可以区分PWA与神经正常成人产生的话语反应。方法采用阿拉伯语话语评估工具(ADAT)收集70名神经正常对照组和50名年龄和教育程度与对照组匹配的PWA在合成图片描述、讲故事叙述和程序性话语三个任务上的话语反应。对话语样本进行转录和分析。对于每个任务,使用来自对照组的话语响应开发和验证CWF检查表和MC列表。随后,在失语症组中检查这两种方法在实时临床环境中的应用。研究了CWF和MC两种方法的心理测量特性。结果新的阿拉伯语CWF清单和MC清单成功开发、验证并应用于临床三个话语任务。分析显示,在实时临床环境中获得的CWF分数与在所有三个话语任务中使用转录和分析话语样本的传统方法确定的CWF分数之间具有显著的高准确性(ICC = 0.88至0.94)。此外,两组的三个任务都有显著的极优信度(ICC = 0.917 ~ 0.994)。大多数MCs在神经正常的对照成人中准确而完整地产生,而在PWA中则大多不存在。CWF清单和MC清单在区分PWA产生的口语话语和神经正常成人产生的口语话语方面显示出显著的高效度。0.001. 这是第一个开发和验证新的阿拉伯语CWF清单和MC清单的研究。此外,本研究表明CWF方法和主概念分析(MCA)可以实时应用于临床PWA。这些不需要转录的方法可以作为常规失语症临床检查的一部分,以提供快速而准确的评估PWA口语话语的CWF(微观语言学)和信息性(宏观语言学)。这些方法也为阿拉伯语失语症患者提供了重要的资源,这将导致准确的失语症评估和更好的临床管理。人们之间的对话在很大程度上依赖于产生相关的、信息丰富的口语话语。因此,人们对临床实践中话语任务的应用越来越感兴趣,从而能够对表达性语言和功能性沟通进行全面评估。然而,在临床环境中使用话语任务是不切实际的,因为它们的管理和评分是耗时的,繁重的劳动,并且必须在会议结束后完成。因此,在英语中,分析语篇反应的低转录、高效和准确的方法得到了发展和验证。然而,没有研究调查了这些方法在失语症患者(PWA)的实时临床环境中的应用。据我们所知,这是第一个开发和验证阿拉伯语内容词流畅性(CWF)清单和主要概念(MC)清单的研究。 使用神经正常对照组的话语反应,为三个话语任务(合成图片描述、讲故事叙述和程序性话语)创建了这些模型;(ii)检查这些有效的、无转录的、高效的和准确的方法在实时临床环境中评估PWA口语话语的CWF和信息性的应用。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?本研究中开发并验证的少转录、高效和准确的话语评估方法允许临床医生在临床检查中客观评估阿拉伯语失语症患者在说话时产生的话语反应,而不需要离线转录、分析和评分。这些方法在实时临床环境中的可靠应用鼓励临床医生将话语任务作为PWA常规临床检查的一部分,用于(i)全面评估单词和句子以外的表达语言技能,(ii)指导个性化治疗目标和策略的发展,以改善功能性沟通。(三)作为监测自发恢复和干预措施反应变化的结果测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信