Unveiling the Possibilities to Minimize the External Debt Burden Through Remittances in Top Remittance's Recipient Countries: A Quantile Regression Approach
{"title":"Unveiling the Possibilities to Minimize the External Debt Burden Through Remittances in Top Remittance's Recipient Countries: A Quantile Regression Approach","authors":"Gilal Ashfaque Ali, Liu Hong, Niaz Hussain Ghumro","doi":"10.1111/ajes.12619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Despite considerable inflows from worker remittances, foreign direct investment (FDI), and foreign grants, many top remittance-receiving countries continue to grapple with a growing external debt burden, posing a critical issue for policymakers and researchers. This study seeks to explore strategies to reduce external debt by investigating factors that either contribute to or mitigate foreign borrowing. Using panel data from 1991 to 2022, drawn from the World Development Indicators (WDI), the study applies Westerlund, Pedroni, and Kao co-integration tests alongside Fully Modified OLS (FMOLS) and Dynamic OLS (DOLS) to address econometric challenges like serial correlation, autocorrelation, endogeneity, and unit roots. To ensure robustness, the study validates findings through Canonical Correlation Analysis and quantile regression, reinforcing the FMOLS and DOLS results. The analysis indicates that worker remittances, FDI, and economic growth significantly alleviate the external debt burden, while factors like debt servicing, gross capital formation, and imports exacerbate it, leading to increased borrowing. Based on these findings, the study recommends that governments enhance economic growth by channeling remittances through formal means and investing them in high-return, productive sectors. Additionally, controlling debt servicing and imports is suggested to better manage external debt.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47133,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","volume":"84 3","pages":"535-545"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite considerable inflows from worker remittances, foreign direct investment (FDI), and foreign grants, many top remittance-receiving countries continue to grapple with a growing external debt burden, posing a critical issue for policymakers and researchers. This study seeks to explore strategies to reduce external debt by investigating factors that either contribute to or mitigate foreign borrowing. Using panel data from 1991 to 2022, drawn from the World Development Indicators (WDI), the study applies Westerlund, Pedroni, and Kao co-integration tests alongside Fully Modified OLS (FMOLS) and Dynamic OLS (DOLS) to address econometric challenges like serial correlation, autocorrelation, endogeneity, and unit roots. To ensure robustness, the study validates findings through Canonical Correlation Analysis and quantile regression, reinforcing the FMOLS and DOLS results. The analysis indicates that worker remittances, FDI, and economic growth significantly alleviate the external debt burden, while factors like debt servicing, gross capital formation, and imports exacerbate it, leading to increased borrowing. Based on these findings, the study recommends that governments enhance economic growth by channeling remittances through formal means and investing them in high-return, productive sectors. Additionally, controlling debt servicing and imports is suggested to better manage external debt.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology (AJES) was founded in 1941, with support from the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation, to encourage the development of transdisciplinary solutions to social problems. In the introduction to the first issue, John Dewey observed that “the hostile state of the world and the intellectual division that has been built up in so-called ‘social science,’ are … reflections and expressions of the same fundamental causes.” Dewey commended this journal for its intention to promote “synthesis in the social field.” Dewey wrote those words almost six decades after the social science associations split off from the American Historical Association in pursuit of value-free knowledge derived from specialized disciplines. Since he wrote them, academic or disciplinary specialization has become even more pronounced. Multi-disciplinary work is superficially extolled in major universities, but practices and incentives still favor highly specialized work. The result is that academia has become a bastion of analytic excellence, breaking phenomena into components for intensive investigation, but it contributes little synthetic or holistic understanding that can aid society in finding solutions to contemporary problems. Analytic work remains important, but in response to the current lop-sided emphasis on specialization, the board of AJES has decided to return to its roots by emphasizing a more integrated and practical approach to knowledge.