Pairing phrase-cued text with readers theatre: Effects on reading prosody and automaticity

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Emily Rodgers, Jerome V. D'Agostino, Joel R. Levin, Timothy Rasinski
{"title":"Pairing phrase-cued text with readers theatre: Effects on reading prosody and automaticity","authors":"Emily Rodgers,&nbsp;Jerome V. D'Agostino,&nbsp;Joel R. Levin,&nbsp;Timothy Rasinski","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We examine effects on oral reading fluency (defined as automatic word recognition and prosody) when phrase-cued text (defined as marking the phrase boundaries in text) is layered on to readers theatre, an evidence-based instructional format that includes multiple readings over a period of about 5 days as students practice and prepare to orally perform a poem or play for an audience.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ten first- to third-grade students (ages 6–9 years old) who were falling behind reading grade-level expectations participated in the study. We used a randomised single-case nonconcurrent multiple-baseline research design that features a time-staggered introduction of the instructional intervention across participants, along with an associated randomisation test statistical analysis. The design is particularly well suited to the present study because it yields valid results based on small sample sizes, contains its own control group (because each participant serves as his or her own control) and allows for the testing of the effectiveness of a specific instructional component – in this case, phrase-cued text.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>As hypothesised, adding phrase-cued phrases led to a statistically significant performance increase on the combination of two subscales of the Multidimensional Fluency Scale (MFS), expression and phrasing, subscales that represent the subconstruct, prosody.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Adding text with highlighted phrase boundaries enhanced the effect of readers theatre on two aspects of prosody: expression and phrasing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"48 2","pages":"153-174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-9817.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Reading","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.70002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We examine effects on oral reading fluency (defined as automatic word recognition and prosody) when phrase-cued text (defined as marking the phrase boundaries in text) is layered on to readers theatre, an evidence-based instructional format that includes multiple readings over a period of about 5 days as students practice and prepare to orally perform a poem or play for an audience.

Methods

Ten first- to third-grade students (ages 6–9 years old) who were falling behind reading grade-level expectations participated in the study. We used a randomised single-case nonconcurrent multiple-baseline research design that features a time-staggered introduction of the instructional intervention across participants, along with an associated randomisation test statistical analysis. The design is particularly well suited to the present study because it yields valid results based on small sample sizes, contains its own control group (because each participant serves as his or her own control) and allows for the testing of the effectiveness of a specific instructional component – in this case, phrase-cued text.

Results

As hypothesised, adding phrase-cued phrases led to a statistically significant performance increase on the combination of two subscales of the Multidimensional Fluency Scale (MFS), expression and phrasing, subscales that represent the subconstruct, prosody.

Conclusions

Adding text with highlighted phrase boundaries enhanced the effect of readers theatre on two aspects of prosody: expression and phrasing.

Abstract Image

短语提示文本与读者戏剧的配对:对阅读韵律和自动性的影响
当短语提示文本(定义为在文本中标记短语边界)分层到读者剧场时,我们研究了对口语阅读流畅性(定义为自动单词识别和韵律)的影响。读者剧场是一种基于证据的教学形式,包括在大约5天的时间内进行多次阅读,学生练习并准备为观众口头表演一首诗或戏剧。方法对10名阅读成绩低于年级预期水平的一至三年级学生(6-9岁)进行调查。我们采用随机的单例非并发多基线研究设计,其特点是在参与者中按时间错开引入教学干预,并进行相关的随机化测试统计分析。这种设计特别适合目前的研究,因为它在小样本的基础上得出了有效的结果,包含了自己的对照组(因为每个参与者都是他或她自己的对照组),并允许测试特定教学成分的有效性——在这种情况下,是短语提示文本。结果与假设的结果一致,在多维流畅度量表(MFS)的两个子量表(表达和短语)的组合上,添加短语提示短语可以显著提高学生的表现,这两个子量表分别代表子构和韵律。结论添加短语边界突出的文本可以增强读者戏剧对韵律表达和短语两个方面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Reading provides an international forum for researchers into literacy. It is a refereed journal, principally devoted to reports of empirical studies in reading and related fields, and to informed reviews of relevant literature. The journal welcomes papers researching issues related to the learning, teaching and use of literacy in a variety of contexts; papers on the history and development of literacy; papers about policy and strategy for literacy as related to children and adults. Journal of Research in Reading encourages papers within any research paradigm and from researchers in any relevant field such as anthropology, cultural studies, education, history of education, language and linguistics, philosophy, psychology and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信