Did screen reading steal children's focus? Longitudinal associations between reading habits, selective attention and text comprehension

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ladislao Salmerón, Lidia Altamura, Mari Carmen Blanco-Gandía, Amelia Mañá, Sandra Montagud, Mario Romero, Cristina Vargas, Laura Gil
{"title":"Did screen reading steal children's focus? Longitudinal associations between reading habits, selective attention and text comprehension","authors":"Ladislao Salmerón,&nbsp;Lidia Altamura,&nbsp;Mari Carmen Blanco-Gandía,&nbsp;Amelia Mañá,&nbsp;Sandra Montagud,&nbsp;Mario Romero,&nbsp;Cristina Vargas,&nbsp;Laura Gil","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The idea that screens ‘stole children's focus’ and that reading books, in contrast, stimulates selective attention is theoretically complex and has largely been ignored in empirical tests. Research has identified positive associations between reading habits and various dimensions of attention in children, but most research is restricted to book or print reading habits, with limited evidence for digital habits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We tested the assumption that selective attention (students' ability to focus on relevant information and to ignore distractors) may mediate the relation between print and digital reading habits and comprehension in a longitudinal study that analysed 654 fourth and 635 fifth grade students at the end of their school year (T1) and 1 year later (T2).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, and contrary to our expectations, the longitudinal associations for reading habits in T1 to selective attention and reading comprehension in T2 were mostly null. Digital reading habits for academic purposes in T1 were negatively associated with reading comprehension in T2, for students assessed from 4th to 5th grade, but not those from 5th to 6th grade. In addition, students' selective attention was positively associated with reading comprehension.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>To conclude, we discuss the need to search for mediators other than selective attention on the associations between reading habits and comprehension and highlight the need to identify key developmental milestones during primary school that may be accomplished to be ready to take full advantage of digital reading practices.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"48 2","pages":"175-198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Reading","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.70003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The idea that screens ‘stole children's focus’ and that reading books, in contrast, stimulates selective attention is theoretically complex and has largely been ignored in empirical tests. Research has identified positive associations between reading habits and various dimensions of attention in children, but most research is restricted to book or print reading habits, with limited evidence for digital habits.

Methods

We tested the assumption that selective attention (students' ability to focus on relevant information and to ignore distractors) may mediate the relation between print and digital reading habits and comprehension in a longitudinal study that analysed 654 fourth and 635 fifth grade students at the end of their school year (T1) and 1 year later (T2).

Results

Overall, and contrary to our expectations, the longitudinal associations for reading habits in T1 to selective attention and reading comprehension in T2 were mostly null. Digital reading habits for academic purposes in T1 were negatively associated with reading comprehension in T2, for students assessed from 4th to 5th grade, but not those from 5th to 6th grade. In addition, students' selective attention was positively associated with reading comprehension.

Conclusions

To conclude, we discuss the need to search for mediators other than selective attention on the associations between reading habits and comprehension and highlight the need to identify key developmental milestones during primary school that may be accomplished to be ready to take full advantage of digital reading practices.

屏幕阅读窃取了孩子们的注意力吗?阅读习惯、选择性注意和文本理解之间的纵向联系
屏幕“偷走了孩子们的注意力”,而阅读书籍则相反,激发了孩子们的选择性注意力,这一观点在理论上是复杂的,在实证测试中基本上被忽视了。研究已经确定了阅读习惯与儿童注意力的各个方面之间的积极联系,但大多数研究仅限于书籍或印刷品的阅读习惯,关于数字习惯的证据有限。方法:通过对654名四年级学生和635名五年级学生的纵向研究,我们验证了选择性注意(学生关注相关信息和忽略干扰物的能力)可能在印刷和数字阅读习惯与理解之间的关系中起中介作用。结果总的来说,与我们的预期相反,T1阶段的阅读习惯与T2阶段的选择性注意和阅读理解之间的纵向关联基本为零。在T1阶段,以学术为目的的数字阅读习惯与T2阶段的阅读理解呈负相关,在四年级到五年级的学生中,但在五年级到六年级的学生中没有。此外,学生的选择性注意与阅读理解呈正相关。综上所述,我们讨论了寻找除了选择性关注阅读习惯和理解之间的关联之外的中介因素的必要性,并强调了确定小学阶段可能完成的关键发展里程碑的必要性,以便为充分利用数字阅读实践做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Reading provides an international forum for researchers into literacy. It is a refereed journal, principally devoted to reports of empirical studies in reading and related fields, and to informed reviews of relevant literature. The journal welcomes papers researching issues related to the learning, teaching and use of literacy in a variety of contexts; papers on the history and development of literacy; papers about policy and strategy for literacy as related to children and adults. Journal of Research in Reading encourages papers within any research paradigm and from researchers in any relevant field such as anthropology, cultural studies, education, history of education, language and linguistics, philosophy, psychology and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信