The Belt and Road Initiative and Urban Entrepreneurship: Evidence From the Opening Policy From China

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Ding Xiong, Xin Zhong, Kai Sun, Sirui Zhao
{"title":"The Belt and Road Initiative and Urban Entrepreneurship: Evidence From the Opening Policy From China","authors":"Ding Xiong,&nbsp;Xin Zhong,&nbsp;Kai Sun,&nbsp;Sirui Zhao","doi":"10.1111/ajes.12614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Entrepreneurship is a vital source of high-quality employment in China and is crucial in advancing Chinese-style modernization. Using panel data from 281 prefecture-level cities in China from 2003 to 2021, this study employs difference-in-differences and double machine learning models to examine the impact of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) on entrepreneurship. The research findings are as follows: The BRI implementation significantly enhances entrepreneurship at city and provincial levels, with results remaining robust across various tests. The BRI promotes entrepreneurship through industrial innovation, digital trade development, and economic agglomeration. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the BRI's positive effects on entrepreneurship are more pronounced in small and medium-sized cities and central and western regions. Furthermore, the BRI exhibits significant spatial spillover effects, stimulating entrepreneurship in neighboring cities. The initiative also effectively reduces relative disparities in entrepreneurship across regions, particularly between eastern, central, and western areas, thus promoting coordinated regional development. Additionally, triple-difference results indicate that the BRI's positive effects on urban industrial innovation are mainly concentrated in manufacturing sectors such as energy, equipment, and information technology. This study complements the BRI's effects and provides policy implications for narrowing regional entrepreneurship gaps and promoting high-quality full employment in China.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47133,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","volume":"84 3","pages":"481-496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Entrepreneurship is a vital source of high-quality employment in China and is crucial in advancing Chinese-style modernization. Using panel data from 281 prefecture-level cities in China from 2003 to 2021, this study employs difference-in-differences and double machine learning models to examine the impact of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) on entrepreneurship. The research findings are as follows: The BRI implementation significantly enhances entrepreneurship at city and provincial levels, with results remaining robust across various tests. The BRI promotes entrepreneurship through industrial innovation, digital trade development, and economic agglomeration. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the BRI's positive effects on entrepreneurship are more pronounced in small and medium-sized cities and central and western regions. Furthermore, the BRI exhibits significant spatial spillover effects, stimulating entrepreneurship in neighboring cities. The initiative also effectively reduces relative disparities in entrepreneurship across regions, particularly between eastern, central, and western areas, thus promoting coordinated regional development. Additionally, triple-difference results indicate that the BRI's positive effects on urban industrial innovation are mainly concentrated in manufacturing sectors such as energy, equipment, and information technology. This study complements the BRI's effects and provides policy implications for narrowing regional entrepreneurship gaps and promoting high-quality full employment in China.

“一带一路”倡议与城市创业:来自中国开放政策的证据
创业是中国高质量就业的重要源泉,是推进中国特色现代化建设的重要内容。本研究利用2003年至2021年中国281个地级市的面板数据,采用差分中的差分和双机器学习模型来检验“一带一路”倡议对创业的影响。研究结果如下:“一带一路”的实施显著增强了城市和省级的创业精神,在各种测试中结果仍然强劲。“一带一路”倡议通过产业创新、数字贸易发展、经济集聚等方式促进创业。异质性分析显示,“一带一路”对创业的积极影响在中小城市和中西部地区更为明显。此外,“一带一路”具有显著的空间溢出效应,促进了周边城市的创业。“一带一路”倡议还有效缩小了区域间特别是东中西部创业相对差距,促进了区域协调发展。此外,三差异结果表明,“一带一路”对城市产业创新的积极影响主要集中在能源、装备和信息技术等制造业领域。本研究补充了“一带一路”倡议的效果,为中国缩小区域创业差距、促进高质量充分就业提供了政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Economics and Sociology (AJES) was founded in 1941, with support from the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation, to encourage the development of transdisciplinary solutions to social problems. In the introduction to the first issue, John Dewey observed that “the hostile state of the world and the intellectual division that has been built up in so-called ‘social science,’ are … reflections and expressions of the same fundamental causes.” Dewey commended this journal for its intention to promote “synthesis in the social field.” Dewey wrote those words almost six decades after the social science associations split off from the American Historical Association in pursuit of value-free knowledge derived from specialized disciplines. Since he wrote them, academic or disciplinary specialization has become even more pronounced. Multi-disciplinary work is superficially extolled in major universities, but practices and incentives still favor highly specialized work. The result is that academia has become a bastion of analytic excellence, breaking phenomena into components for intensive investigation, but it contributes little synthetic or holistic understanding that can aid society in finding solutions to contemporary problems. Analytic work remains important, but in response to the current lop-sided emphasis on specialization, the board of AJES has decided to return to its roots by emphasizing a more integrated and practical approach to knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信