Two Decades of Automated AI Planning Methods in Construction and Fabrication: a Systematic Review

IF 23.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Shermin Sherkat, Thomas Wortmann, Andreas Wortmann
{"title":"Two Decades of Automated AI Planning Methods in Construction and Fabrication: a Systematic Review","authors":"Shermin Sherkat, Thomas Wortmann, Andreas Wortmann","doi":"10.1145/3729529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Task planning and scheduling are crucial for construction or fabrication (CF) processes. Automating them is necessary for more efficient plans in terms of time and resources. However, most construction planning processes are still performed manually despite the existence of various AI methods. Symbolic AI automated task planning (ATP) techniques offer a variety of features to tackle task planning problems, but their application to CF has not been researched yet. This study identifies the current state of research and gaps in the literature regarding these AI techniques while providing directions for future research. We conduct a systematic review that evaluates existing literature on ATP in terms of environmental characteristics, modeling languages, ATP techniques, and results. We searched the ACM, IEEE, Scopus, WOS, and SpringerLink databases for papers published in the last 20 years (2002-2022) that discuss symbolic AI methods used in task planning within the CF fields. Our findings indicate that research on automated planning is currently limited regarding the characteristics of CF environments. Only a few papers have utilized symbolic languages, AI planners, and ATP techniques. No paper has evaluated their planning system in an on-site CF process. As a result, many symbolic languages, planners, and ATP techniques remain unexplored.","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3729529","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Task planning and scheduling are crucial for construction or fabrication (CF) processes. Automating them is necessary for more efficient plans in terms of time and resources. However, most construction planning processes are still performed manually despite the existence of various AI methods. Symbolic AI automated task planning (ATP) techniques offer a variety of features to tackle task planning problems, but their application to CF has not been researched yet. This study identifies the current state of research and gaps in the literature regarding these AI techniques while providing directions for future research. We conduct a systematic review that evaluates existing literature on ATP in terms of environmental characteristics, modeling languages, ATP techniques, and results. We searched the ACM, IEEE, Scopus, WOS, and SpringerLink databases for papers published in the last 20 years (2002-2022) that discuss symbolic AI methods used in task planning within the CF fields. Our findings indicate that research on automated planning is currently limited regarding the characteristics of CF environments. Only a few papers have utilized symbolic languages, AI planners, and ATP techniques. No paper has evaluated their planning system in an on-site CF process. As a result, many symbolic languages, planners, and ATP techniques remain unexplored.
二十年来建筑和制造中的自动化人工智能规划方法:系统回顾
任务规划和调度是施工或制造(CF)过程的关键。在时间和资源方面,自动化它们对于更有效的计划是必要的。然而,尽管存在各种人工智能方法,大多数建筑规划过程仍然是手动执行的。符号人工智能自动任务规划(ATP)技术提供了各种功能来解决任务规划问题,但其在CF中的应用尚未研究。本研究确定了这些人工智能技术的研究现状和文献空白,同时为未来的研究提供了方向。我们从环境特征、建模语言、ATP技术和结果等方面对现有的ATP文献进行了系统的评价。我们在ACM, IEEE, Scopus, WOS和SpringerLink数据库中检索了过去20年(2002-2022)发表的论文,这些论文讨论了在CF领域中用于任务规划的符号人工智能方法。我们的研究结果表明,目前关于CF环境特征的自动化规划研究有限。只有少数论文使用了符号语言、人工智能规划器和ATP技术。没有论文在现场CF过程中评估他们的计划系统。因此,许多符号语言、规划和ATP技术仍未被探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Computing Surveys
ACM Computing Surveys 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
33.20
自引率
0.60%
发文量
372
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods. ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信