Evaluating defensive driving behaviour based on safe distance between vehicles: A case study using computer vision on UAV videos at urban roundabout

Yagnik M. Bhavsar , Mazad S. Zaveri , Mehul S. Raval , Shaheriar B. Zaveri
{"title":"Evaluating defensive driving behaviour based on safe distance between vehicles: A case study using computer vision on UAV videos at urban roundabout","authors":"Yagnik M. Bhavsar ,&nbsp;Mazad S. Zaveri ,&nbsp;Mehul S. Raval ,&nbsp;Shaheriar B. Zaveri","doi":"10.1016/j.multra.2025.100227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While driving, maintaining a sufficient distance helps reduce collision risk. A time gap of two or three seconds on urban roads from a vehicle ahead is advised in defensive driving. The scenario becomes even more challenging in densely populated and developing countries because of limited road infrastructure, lane indiscipline, and heterogeneous traffic. The safe distance between vehicles and the driver’s reaction can be used as surrogate safety measures (SSMs) to evaluate defensive driving behaviour. This paper presents a case study evaluating defensive driving behaviour using the vision-based methodology and UAV video. This paper proposes two novel SSMs based on distance and acceleration and studies defensive driving behaviour, such as “for how long did a vehicle keep driving under another vehicle’s blind spots?” and “how is a vehicle driving (an interaction pattern) when another vehicle ahead is in its stopping distance range?.” Finally, each driver’s star rating depends on their interactions with other vehicles. We observed that around 48 % of the vehicles did not follow defensive driving practices. In our vehicle inter-class interaction analyses, we also found 16.6 % Rear-End, 6.3 % Side-Swipe, and 1.5 % Angled collision risks occurred between car-car, car-car, and 2Wheeler(2W)-car, respectively. Our methodology could help traffic law enforcement agencies and policy-makers elevate road traffic safety by taking counter-measures against the low-star vehicle categories in developing countries. Example videos of star rating are available on <span><span>https://www.youtube.com/@YagnikBhavsar</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100933,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Transportation","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586325000413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While driving, maintaining a sufficient distance helps reduce collision risk. A time gap of two or three seconds on urban roads from a vehicle ahead is advised in defensive driving. The scenario becomes even more challenging in densely populated and developing countries because of limited road infrastructure, lane indiscipline, and heterogeneous traffic. The safe distance between vehicles and the driver’s reaction can be used as surrogate safety measures (SSMs) to evaluate defensive driving behaviour. This paper presents a case study evaluating defensive driving behaviour using the vision-based methodology and UAV video. This paper proposes two novel SSMs based on distance and acceleration and studies defensive driving behaviour, such as “for how long did a vehicle keep driving under another vehicle’s blind spots?” and “how is a vehicle driving (an interaction pattern) when another vehicle ahead is in its stopping distance range?.” Finally, each driver’s star rating depends on their interactions with other vehicles. We observed that around 48 % of the vehicles did not follow defensive driving practices. In our vehicle inter-class interaction analyses, we also found 16.6 % Rear-End, 6.3 % Side-Swipe, and 1.5 % Angled collision risks occurred between car-car, car-car, and 2Wheeler(2W)-car, respectively. Our methodology could help traffic law enforcement agencies and policy-makers elevate road traffic safety by taking counter-measures against the low-star vehicle categories in developing countries. Example videos of star rating are available on https://www.youtube.com/@YagnikBhavsar.
基于车辆安全距离的防御性驾驶行为评估:城市环岛无人机视频计算机视觉案例研究
在驾驶时,保持足够的距离有助于减少碰撞风险。在城市道路上,防守型行驶时,建议与前方车辆保持2 ~ 3秒的时间差。在人口稠密的发展中国家,由于道路基础设施有限、车道不规范和交通混杂,这种情况更具挑战性。车辆之间的安全距离和驾驶员的反应可以作为替代安全措施(SSMs)来评估防御性驾驶行为。本文介绍了一个使用基于视觉的方法和无人机视频评估防御性驾驶行为的案例研究。本文提出了两种基于距离和加速度的新型ssm,并研究了防御性驾驶行为,如“一辆车在另一辆车的盲点下持续行驶多久?”以及“当前面的另一辆车在其停车距离范围内时,车辆如何驾驶(交互模式)?”最后,每位司机的星级评级取决于他们与其他车辆的互动。我们观察到,大约48%的车辆没有遵循防御性驾驶做法。在我们的车辆间相互作用分析中,我们还发现汽车-汽车、汽车-汽车和2W -汽车之间分别发生16.6%的追尾、6.3%的侧滑和1.5%的角度碰撞风险。我们的方法可以帮助交通执法机构和政策制定者通过对发展中国家的低星级车辆类别采取对策来提高道路交通安全。星级评定的示例视频可在https://www.youtube.com/@YagnikBhavsar上找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信