Performance evaluation of geocell-reinforced pavements overlying black cotton soil

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Sayanti Banerjee, Bappaditya Manna, J.T. Shahu
{"title":"Performance evaluation of geocell-reinforced pavements overlying black cotton soil","authors":"Sayanti Banerjee,&nbsp;Bappaditya Manna,&nbsp;J.T. Shahu","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study conducted full-scale field trials in Dholera to examine the performance of geocell-reinforced and unreinforced pavements on expansive subgrades. Three geocell-reinforced sections (S-2 on expansive subgrade, S-4 on lime-treated subgrade, and S-5 on lime-treated subgrade with reduced base) and two unreinforced sections (S-1 on expansive subgrade and S-3 on lime-treated subgrade) were constructed. Performance was evaluated using static plate load tests and falling weight deflectometer tests. Geocell reinforcement enhances pavement bearing capacity, reduces subgrade vertical stress, and offers potential reductions in life-cycle costs and annual greenhouse gas emissions. Section S-2 showed higher bearing capacity compared to those of section S-3, highlighting the efficacy of reinforced sections over traditional stabilization. The study found that solely relying on lime treatment for expansive soil is not very effective, but combining it with geocells significantly improves pavement performance. Section S-4 showed the highest improvement in pavement performance, with a bearing capacity improvement factor of 3.04, modulus improvement factor of 2.26, and service life ratio of 2.61. The comparable performance of sections S-4 and S-5 suggests that section S-5 offers a sustainable and cost-effective alternative with satisfactory performance. Additionally, numerical analysis confirms the reliability of the field results as a valuable resource for researchers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 5","pages":"Pages 1076-1093"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114425000524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study conducted full-scale field trials in Dholera to examine the performance of geocell-reinforced and unreinforced pavements on expansive subgrades. Three geocell-reinforced sections (S-2 on expansive subgrade, S-4 on lime-treated subgrade, and S-5 on lime-treated subgrade with reduced base) and two unreinforced sections (S-1 on expansive subgrade and S-3 on lime-treated subgrade) were constructed. Performance was evaluated using static plate load tests and falling weight deflectometer tests. Geocell reinforcement enhances pavement bearing capacity, reduces subgrade vertical stress, and offers potential reductions in life-cycle costs and annual greenhouse gas emissions. Section S-2 showed higher bearing capacity compared to those of section S-3, highlighting the efficacy of reinforced sections over traditional stabilization. The study found that solely relying on lime treatment for expansive soil is not very effective, but combining it with geocells significantly improves pavement performance. Section S-4 showed the highest improvement in pavement performance, with a bearing capacity improvement factor of 3.04, modulus improvement factor of 2.26, and service life ratio of 2.61. The comparable performance of sections S-4 and S-5 suggests that section S-5 offers a sustainable and cost-effective alternative with satisfactory performance. Additionally, numerical analysis confirms the reliability of the field results as a valuable resource for researchers.
黑棉土上覆土工格室加筋路面性能评价
该研究在Dholera进行了全面的现场试验,以检查土工格室加固和未加固路面在膨胀路基上的性能。建造了3个土工格室加固段(膨胀路基的S-2、石灰处理路基的S-4和地基减少的石灰处理路基的S-5)和2个非加固段(膨胀路基的S-1和石灰处理路基的S-3)。使用静板载荷试验和下落重量挠度计试验对性能进行了评估。土工格室加固增强了路面承载能力,降低了路基垂直应力,并有可能降低生命周期成本和年度温室气体排放。S-2截面的承载力高于S-3截面,突出了加固截面相对于传统加固的有效性。研究发现,单纯依靠石灰处理膨胀土效果不佳,但与土工细胞结合使用可显著改善路面性能。S-4路段路面性能改善幅度最大,承载改善系数为3.04,模量改善系数为2.26,使用寿命比为2.61。第S-4款和第S-5款的业绩比较表明,第S-5款提供了一种业绩令人满意的可持续和具有成本效益的替代办法。此外,数值分析证实了现场结果的可靠性,为研究人员提供了宝贵的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotextiles and Geomembranes 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
21.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident. Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信